Literature DB >> 29691930

Through-focus optical characteristics of monofocal and bifocal soft contact lenses across the peripheral visual field.

Qiuzhi Ji1, Young-Sik Yoo1,2, Hira Alam1,3, Geunyoung Yoon1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterise the impact of monofocal soft contact lens (SCL) and bifocal SCLs on refractive error, depth of focus (DoF) and orientation of blur in the peripheral visual field.
METHODS: Monofocal and two bifocal SCLs, Acuvue Bifocal (AVB, Johnson & Johnson) and Misight Dual Focus (DF, CooperVision) with +2.0 D add power were modelled using a ray tracing program (ZEMAX) based on their power maps. These SCLs were placed onto the anterior corneal surface of the simulated Atchison myopic eye model to correct for -3.0 D spherical refractive error at the fovea. To quantify through-focus retinal image quality, defocus from -3.5 D to 1.5 D in 0.5 D steps was induced at each horizontal eccentricity from 0 to 40° in 10° steps. Wavefront aberrations were computed for each visual eccentricity and defocus. The retinal images were simulated using a custom software program developed in Matlab (The MathWorks) by convolving the point spread function calculated from the aberration with a reference image. The convolved images were spatially filtered to match the spatial resolution limit of each peripheral eccentricity. Retinal image quality was then quantified by the 2-D cross-correlation between the filtered convolved retinal images and the reference image. Peripheral defocus, DoF and orientation of blur were also estimated.
RESULTS: In comparison with the monofocal SCL, the bifocal SCLs degraded retinal image quality while DoF was increased at fovea. From 10 to 20°, a relatively small amount of myopic shift (less than 0.3 D) was induced by bifocal SCLs compared with monofocal. DoF was also increased with bifocal SCLs at peripheral vision of 10 and 20°. The trend of myopic shift became less consistent at larger eccentricity, where at 30° DF showed a 0.75 D myopic shift while AVB showed a 0.2 D hyperopic shift and both AVB and DF exhibited large relative hyperopic defocus at 40°. The anisotropy in orientation of blur was found to increase and change its direction through focus beyond central vision. This trend was found to be less dominant with bifocal SCLs compared to monofocal SCL.
CONCLUSIONS: Bifocal SCLs have a relatively small impact on myopic shift in peripheral refractive error while DoF is increased significantly. We hypothetically suggest that a mechanism underlying myopia control with these bifocal or multifocal contact lenses is an increase in DoF and a decrease in anisotropy of peripheral optical blur.
© 2018 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2018 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contact lenses; myopia; visual fields

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29691930     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  7 in total

1.  Accommodation response and spherical aberration during orthokeratology.

Authors:  L Batres; S Peruzzo; M Serramito; G Carracedo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Retinal defocus in myopes wearing dual-focus zonal contact lenses.

Authors:  Neeraj K Singh; Dawn Meyer; Matt Jaskulski; Pete Kollbaum
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 3.992

Review 3.  To Correct or Not Correct? Actual Evidence, Controversy and the Questions That Remain Open.

Authors:  Miguel García García; Katharina Breher; Arne Ohlendorf; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  2-D Peripheral image quality metrics with different types of multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Miguel García García; Siegfried Wahl; Dibyendu Pusti; Pablo Artal; Arne Ohlendorf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Simultaneous measurements of foveal and peripheral aberrations with accommodation in myopic and emmetropic eyes.

Authors:  Dmitry Romashchenko; Petros Papadogiannis; Peter Unsbo; Linda Lundström
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Short-term tear film stability, optical quality and visual performance in two dual-focus contact lenses for myopia control with different optical designs.

Authors:  José Vicente García-Marqués; Rute Juliana Macedo-De-Araújo; Colm McAlinden; Miguel Faria-Ribeiro; Alejandro Cerviño; José Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.992

Review 7.  Peripheral refraction and higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Dmitry Romashchenko; Robert Rosén; Linda Lundström
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.742

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.