| Literature DB >> 29691811 |
Mridul Majumder1, Saeid Rajabnezhad2, Ali Nokhodchi2,3, Mohammed Maniruzzaman4.
Abstract
The current study explores the first case of the implementation of solution calorimetry (SolCal) in order to determine the amorphous content of crystalline benzoyl-methoxy-methylindol-acetic acid (BMA)-a model poorly soluble drug, in the amorphous granules prepared via single-step continuous twin-screw dry granulations (TSG). Amorphous magnesium aluminometasilicate (Neusilin®) (US2) was used as a novel inorganic carrier via a TwinLab 10 mm twin-screw extruder. The BMA/US2 blends were processed at 180 °C and varying drug: carrier ratios of 1:4, 1:2.5 and 1:1 (w/w). Physico-chemical characterisation conducted via SEM, DSC and XRPD showed amorphous state of the drug in all granulated formulations. Reverse optical microscopy revealed a meso-porous structure of US2 in which the drug particles are adsorbed and/or entrapped within the porous network of the carrier. This phenomenon can be the underlying reason for the increase of the amorphous content in the extruded granules. Solution calorimetry (SolCal) study revealed amorphous content of the drug in all formulations quite precisely, whereas the dynamic vapour sorption (DVS) analysis complemented the results from SolCal. Furthermore, an attempt has been made for the first time to interrelate the findings from the SolCal to that of the release of the drug from the amorphous granules. It can be concluded that SolCal can be used as a novel technique to precisely quantify and interrelate the amorphous content to its physico-chemical performances such as drug release from the granulated formulations processed via TSG.Entities:
Keywords: Amorphous; DVS; Granules; Solution calorimetry; Twin screw granulations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29691811 PMCID: PMC6280807 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-018-0519-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv Transl Res ISSN: 2190-393X Impact factor: 4.617
Fig. 1SEM images of US2 bulk and BMA/US2 extruded granules
Fig. 2Fluorescence microscopic images of BMA/US2 granules produced via HME
Fig. 3Particle size distribution of extruded formulations processed via dry granulations processing. a US2 4. b US2 2.5. c US2 1
Fig. 4DSC transitions of bulk BMA, US2, physical blends of the formulations and extruded granules
Fig. 5XRPD diffractograms of bulk BMA, US2 and all BMA/US2 formulations
Fig. 6a FTIR spectra of bulk BMA, US2 and all extruded formulations. b Molecular modelling of the drug and excipient to outline the possible interactions
Fig. 7a Water sorption isotherms of formulation US2 4. b Water sorption kinetics of formulation US2 4
Hygroscopicity classification
| Classification | Weight increase at 80% RH (25 °C) |
|---|---|
| Non-hygroscopic | < 0.2% |
| Slightly hygroscopic | ≥ 0.2 and < 2% |
| Hygroscopic | ≥ 2 and < 15% |
| Very hygroscopic | ≥ 15% |
| Deliquescent | Sufficient water is absorbed to form a liquid |
From [28]
Solution calorimetric data of US2 samples
| Sample | Trial | Weight (g) | Heat of solution (∆ | Theoretical heat of solution (∆ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-break calibration | Post-break calibration | Mean | Overall mean | SD | RSD | ||||
| BMA | 1 | 0.10026 | 36.005 | 35.998 | 36.00 | 36.6 | 0.5 | 1.4 | N/A |
| 2 | 0.10034 | 36.947 | 36.974 | 36.96 | |||||
| 3 | 0.10036 | 36.888 | 36.839 | 36.86 | |||||
| US2 | 1 | 0.10062 | − 45.948 | − 45.874 | − 45.91 | − 46.5 | 0.5 | − 1.1 | |
| 2 | 0.10064 | − 46.869 | − 46.847 | − 46.86 | |||||
| 3 | 0.10053 | − 46.670 | − 46.656 | − 46.66 | |||||
| US2 1 (PM) | 1 | 0.10013 | − 5.951 | − 5.936 | − 5.94 | − 5.4 | 0.5 | − 9.0 | − 4.9 |
| 2 | 0.10186 | − 4.974 | − 4.969 | − 4.97 | |||||
| 3 | 0.10071 | − 5.369 | − 5.356 | − 5.36 | |||||
| US2 4 | 1 | 0.10072 | − 10.823 | − 10.809 | − 10.82 | − 10.9 | 0.3 | − 2.8 | − 29.9 |
| 2 | 0.10070 | − 10.726 | − 10.702 | − 10.71 | |||||
| 3 | 0.10050 | − 11.293 | − 11.277 | − 11.29 | |||||
| US2 2.5 | 1 | 0.10008 | − 15.983 | − 15.968 | − 15.98 | − 16.3 | 0.6 | − 3.9 | − 21.6 |
| 2 | 0.10035 | − 17.014 | − 16.986 | − 17.00 | |||||
| 3 | 0.10009 | − 15.866 | − 15.850 | − 15.86 | |||||
| US2 1 | 1 | 0.10045 | − 14.052 | − 14.003 | − 14.03 | − 14.4 | 0.4 | − 3.1 | − 13.2 |
| 2 | 0.10045 | − 14.911 | − 14.894 | − 14.90 | |||||
| 3 | 0.10092 | − 14.292 | − 14.276 | − 14.28 | |||||
Fig. 8Heat of solution data of all formulations and interrelation with the drug release at t30 (n = 3)