| Literature DB >> 29690903 |
Xin Chu1, Qunyan Jin2, Hui Chen1, G Craig Wood1, Anthony Petrick1, William Strodel1, Jon Gabrielsen1, Peter Benotti1, Tooraj Mirshahi1, David J Carey1, Christopher D Still1, Johanna K DiStefano3, Glenn S Gerhard4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a prevalent complication of extreme obesity. Loading of the liver with fat can progress to inflammation and fibrosis including cirrhosis. The molecular factors involved in the progression from simple steatosis to fibrosis remain poorly understood.Entities:
Keywords: CCL20; Fibrosis; NAFLD
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29690903 PMCID: PMC5937820 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1490-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Transcripts showing the highest up-regulation measured using the U133 human genome array (Affymetrix) in severe fibrosis relative to normal histology
| Gene | Gene name | SLR |
|---|---|---|
| CCL20 | C-C motif chemokine ligand 20 | 5.9 |
| STMN2 | Stathmin 2 | 5.3 |
| IGHM | Ig rearranged mu-chain gene V-N-D-N-J-region | 4.1 |
| RTN1 | Reticulon 1 | 4.0 |
| IGL | Immunoglobulin lambda gene locus DNA, clone:84E4 | 3.9 |
| AKR1B10 | Aldo–keto reductase family 1, member B10 | 3.8 |
| LCK | Lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase | 3.4 |
| DEFA1 | Defensin, alpha 1 | 3.4 |
| COL15A1 | Collagen, type XV, alpha 1 | 3.2 |
SLR signal log ratio
Fig. 1QPCR of CCL20 mRNA from 35 liver samples with normal histology (red bar) and 32 samples with fibrosis (blue bar) comprised of 11 with grade 1, 16 with grade 3 bridging fibrosis, and 5 with grade 4 cirrhosis. CCL20 mRNA levels were significantly increased (Mann–Whitney two-tailed p < 0.0001) in fibrosis
Fig. 2Box and whisker plot of serum CCL20 levels in 106 patients with normal liver histology (normal), 18 with grade 1 fibrosis (grade 1), 18 with grade 2 fibrosis (grade 2), 28 with grade 3 (bridging) fibrosis (grade 3), and 13 with grade 4 fibrosis/cirrhosis (grade 4). Three high CCL20 values, two grade 3 samples (270 and 538 pg/ml) and one grade 4 sample (580 pg/ml), are not shown in the plot for clarity of presentation. Median serum levels were increased in patient with histological grades of fibrosis (Kruskal–Wallis test Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis-of-variance-by-ranks test p < 0.0001)
Fig. 3Plot of liver RNA expression of CCL20 versus CCL20 serum values. CCL20 liver RNA and serum levels were positively correlated. The 44 paired samples analyzed had an r2 of 0.1043 (r = 0.323) with a p (two-tailed) = 0.0325 and a regression line of y = 0.1043*x + 11.56
Fig. 4Transcript levels of CCL20 and CCR6 in HepG2 (a, b) and LX-2 (c, d) cells in response to fatty acid loading. a CCL20 transcript levels were increased by nearly fivefold (**Mann–Whitney p = 0.0029) in HepG2 cells treated with 1 mM oleic acid compared with BSA treated control cells, and by just over two- and threefold (*Mann–Whitney p < 0.0001), respectively, by 250 and 500 mM palmitic acid. b In contrast, in LX-2 cells, CCL20 levels increased ~ 13-fold with 250 μM (p < 0.0001) and the positive control LPS (p < 0.0001), ~ 15-fold with 500 μM of palmitic acid (p < 0.0001), and ~twofold (p < 0.0001) and ~eightfold (p < 0.0001) in response to oleic acid or 1 mM palmitic acid/oleic acid (50/50) mixture, respectively. c No statistically significant differences were observed in CCR6 transcript levels across the different treatments in HepG2 cells after adjusting for multiple comparisons. d In LX-2 cells, the only pairwise comparison to achieve statistical significance was ~ 50% decrease in CCR6 transcript levels in response to 500 μM oleic acid