Literature DB >> 29688318

Revisiting the scientific method to improve rigor and reproducibility of immunohistochemistry in reproductive science.

Sharrón L Manuel1, Brian W Johnson2, Charles W Frevert2, Francesca E Duncan1,3.   

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a robust scientific tool whereby cellular components are visualized within a tissue, and this method has been and continues to be a mainstay for many reproductive biologists. IHC is highly informative if performed and interpreted correctly, but studies have shown that the general use and reporting of appropriate controls in IHC experiments is low. This omission of the scientific method can result in data that lack rigor and reproducibility. In this editorial, we highlight key concepts in IHC controls and describe an opportunity for our field to partner with the Histochemical Society to adopt their IHC guidelines broadly as researchers, authors, ad hoc reviewers, editorial board members, and editors-in-chief. Such cross-professional society interactions will ensure that we produce the highest quality data as new technologies emerge that still rely upon the foundations of classic histological and immunohistochemical principles.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29688318      PMCID: PMC6203879          DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioy094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  7 in total

Review 1.  Immunohistochemistry should undergo robust validation equivalent to that of molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Kelly Elliott; Stephen McQuaid; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Perry Maxwell
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Antibody anarchy: A call to order.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Reproducibility crisis: Blame it on the antibodies.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Controls for immunohistochemistry: the Histochemical Society's standards of practice for validation of immunohistochemical assays.

Authors:  Stephen M Hewitt; Denis G Baskin; Charles W Frevert; William L Stahl; Eduardo Rosa-Molinar
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 5.  Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities.

Authors:  Leonard P Freedman; Gautham Venugopalan; Rosann Wisman
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-05-02

Review 6.  Getting controls under control: the time is now for immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Søren Nielsen; Mogens Vyberg; Clive R Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The Resource Identification Initiative: A Cultural Shift in Publishing.

Authors:  Anita Bandrowski; Matthew Brush; Jeffery S Grethe; Melissa A Haendel; David N Kennedy; Sean Hill; Patrick R Hof; Maryann E Martone; Maaike Pols; Serena C Tan; Nicole Washington; Elena Zudilova-Seinstra; Nicole Vasilevsky
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Quantitative Digital Pathology to Measure Proteoglycan and Glycosaminoglycan Expression and Accumulation in Healthy and Diseased Tissues.

Authors:  A Sally Davis; Mary Y Chang; Jourdan E Brune; Teal S Hallstrand; Brian Johnson; Sarah Lindhartsen; Stephen M Hewitt; Charles W Frevert
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Perspective: Dimensions of the scientific method.

Authors:  Eberhard O Voit
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.