Literature DB >> 29687341

Correlation of Neck Circumference with Difficult Mask Ventilation and Difficult Laryngoscopy in Morbidly Obese Patients: an Observational Study.

Aylin Özdilek1, Cigdem Akyol Beyoglu1, Şafak Emre Erbabacan2, Birsel Ekici1, Fatiş Altındaş1, Suphi Vehid3, Güniz Meyancı Köksal1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mask ventilation and laryngoscopy can be challenging in morbidly obese patients because of excessive fat tissue. There are studies suggesting that neck circumference is associated with difficult mask ventilation, difficult laryngoscopy, and difficult intubation. The primary aim of our study is to evaluate predictive value of neck circumference for difficult mask ventilation and difficult laryngoscopy in female and male morbidly obese patients separately.
METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study was performed in the period between March 2015 and December 2015. One hundred and twenty (37 male and 83 female) patients undergoing elective surgery were included. Neck circumference, BMI, Mallampati scores, neck movements, dentition, upper lip bite test, breast, thorax, waist, hip circumferences, mouth opening, and sternomental and thyromental distances were evaluated preoperatively. Mask ventilation was graded using four-grade classification. Laryngoscopy was evaluated by Cormack Lehane score.
RESULTS: The incidence of difficult mask ventilation was 13.5% in male and 3.6% in female patients. Mouth opening ≤ 6.5 cm and inadequate flexion were found as significant predictors for difficult mask ventilation in male patients. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy was 10.8% in male and 4.8% in female patients. Mallampati score > II was found as a significant predictor for difficult laryngoscopy in both male and female patients. Sternomental distance ≤ 16 cm and inadequate flexion were also significant predictors for difficult laryngoscopy in male patients. Neck circumference was not found statistically significant predictor for difficult mask ventilation and laryngoscopy in morbidly obese patients in our study.
CONCLUSION: Neck circumference is not a statistically significant predictor for difficult mask ventilation and laryngoscopy in morbidly Turkish obese male and female patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02589015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Difficult laryngoscopy; Difficult mask ventilation; Morbid obesity; Neck circumference

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29687341     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3263-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  28 in total

1.  Prediction of difficult mask ventilation.

Authors:  O Langeron; E Masso; C Huraux; M Guggiari; A Bianchi; P Coriat; B Riou
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation.

Authors:  D Savva
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics.

Authors:  R S Cormack; J Lehane
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Neck circumference to thyromental distance ratio: a new predictor of difficult intubation in obese patients.

Authors:  W H Kim; H J Ahn; C J Lee; B S Shin; J S Ko; S J Choi; S A Ryu
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Morbid obesity and tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jay B Brodsky; Harry J M Lemmens; John G Brock-Utne; Mark Vierra; Lawrence J Saidman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions.

Authors:  Jeremy S Collins; Harry J M Lemmens; Jay B Brodsky; John G Brock-Utne; Richard M Levitan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients.

Authors:  Philippe Juvin; Elisabeth Lavaut; Hervé Dupont; Pascale Lefevre; Monique Demetriou; Jean-Louis Dumoulin; Jean-Marie Desmonts
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Value of oropharyngeal Mallampati classification in predicting difficult laryngoscopy among obese patients.

Authors:  G S Voyagis; K P Kyriakis; V Dimitriou; I Vrettou
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE): a physiological method of increasing apnoea time in patients with difficult airways.

Authors:  A Patel; S A R Nouraei
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Predictive factors for difficult mask ventilation in the obese surgical population.

Authors:  Davide Cattano; Anastasia Katsiampoura; Ruggero M Corso; Peter V Killoran; Chunyan Cai; Carin A Hagberg
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-10-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the correlation between preoperative airway assessment tests, anthropometric measurements, and endotracheal intubation difficulty in obesity class III patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Emre Emik; Funda Gümüs-Özcan; Serdar Demirgan; Aysin Selcan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Obesity and the Other Independent Predictors in Elective Endotracheal Tube Intubations: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Lakshmi Rekha Narra; Ndausung Udongwo; Jerry Lorren Dominic; Shriya Doreswamy; Anam Bhasir; Islam Elkherpitawy; Chinwe Ogedegbe
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Limited condylar mobility by ultrasonography predicts difficult direct laryngoscopy in morbidly obese patients: An observational study.

Authors:  Harika M Bindu; Neeti Dogra; Jeetinder K Makkar; Nidhi Bhatia; Shyam Meena; Rajesh Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-08-25

4.  Ultrasound measurement of laryngeal structures in the parasagittal plane for the prediction of difficult laryngoscopies in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Hongwei Ni; Chunming Guan; Guangbao He; Yang Bao; Dongping Shi; Yijun Zhu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.