Literature DB >> 2968667

Computed tomography, electrodiagnostic and clinical findings in chronic workers' compensation patients with back and leg pain.

S Haldeman1, M Shouka, S Robboy.   

Abstract

One hundred patients with complaints of low-back pain and leg pain, consistent with a diagnosis of sciatica, were evaluated. All patients had complaints for longer than 6 months and had recently undergone electrodiagnostic testing and computed tomography (CT). Correlation was made between symptoms, straight leg raising, clinical neurological deficits, electrodiagnostic and CT findings. The radiation of pain above or below the knee and pain on straight leg raising did not show a high correlation with each other or with neurological deficits or CT findings. Electrodiagnostic studies often defined a radiculopathy in patients with equivocal clinical signs. CT findings did not predict the nature of symptoms or clinical and electrodiagnostic findings. Electrodiagnostic abnormalities showed the greatest ability to predict CT abnormalities. It is concluded that in chronic sciatica patients, no single diagnostic parameter is conclusive and a combination of clinical and laboratory findings is necessary to reach a diagnosis. In addition, many assumptions, valid in patients with acute pain cannot be extrapolated to patients with chronic sciatica.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2968667     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198803000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Critically re-evaluating a common technique: Accuracy, reliability, and confirmation bias of EMG.

Authors:  Pushpa Narayanaswami; Thomas Geisbush; Lyell Jones; Michael Weiss; Tahseen Mozaffar; Gary Gronseth; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  The accuracy of the physical examination for the diagnosis of midlumbar and low lumbar nerve root impingement.

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; James Rainville; Jeffrey N Katz; Cristin Jouve; Carol Hartigan; Janet Limke; Enrique Pena; Ling Li; Bryan Swaim; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Efficacy of lumbar discectomy and percutaneous treatments for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  C D Stevens; R W Dubois; T Larequi-Lauber; J P Vader
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1997

Review 4.  The Global Spine Care Initiative: a narrative review of psychological and social issues in back pain in low- and middle-income communities.

Authors:  Christine Cedraschi; Margareta Nordin; Scott Haldeman; Kristi Randhawa; Deborah Kopansky-Giles; Claire D Johnson; Roger Chou; Eric L Hurwitz; Pierre Côté
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 6.  Accuracy of clinical neurological examination in diagnosing lumbo-sacral radiculopathy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nassib Tawa; Anthea Rhoda; Ina Diener
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.