Literature DB >> 29685772

Corneal stromal demarcation line after 4 protocols of corneal crosslinking in keratoconus determined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Leopoldo Spadea1, Lucia Di Genova2, Emanuele Tonti2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to compare corneal stromal demarcation line depth after 4 treatment protocols of corneal crosslinking (CXL).
SETTING: Eye Clinic, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina (Latina), Italy.
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
METHODS: Patients with progressive keratoconus were delegated to one of the following CXL treatments: (1) conventional epithelium (epi)-off 3 mW/cm2 according to the standard Dresden protocol (C-CXL group), (2) accelerated epi-off 10 mW/cm2 (A-CXL group), (3) transepithelial epi-on 3 mW/cm2 (TE-CXL group), or (4) transepithelial epi-on by iontophoresis 10 mW/cm2 (I-CXL group). Two independent observers measured the corneal stromal demarcation line using AS-OCT.
RESULTS: The study comprised 70 patients (120 eyes, 30 eyes in each group). The corneal stromal demarcation line was identified on AS-OCT scans in 109 eyes (90.8%). One month after the treatment, the mean stromal demarcation line depth was 275.05 μm ± 41.83 (SD) in the C-CXL group, 279.35 ± 33.07 μm in the A-CXL group, 132.60 ± 22.14 μm in the TE-CXL group, and 235.40 ± 37.08 μm in the I-CXL group. The difference in stromal demarcation line depth was not statistically significant between the C-CXL and A-CXL group, but it was statistically significant (P < .05) between the epi-off and epi-on CXL groups and between the 2 epi-on groups, where the demarcation line was significantly deeper in the I-CXL group than in the TE-CXL group.
CONCLUSION: The corneal stromal demarcation line was significantly deeper after epi-off 30-minute standard CXL treatment and after epi-off 9-minute accelerated CXL with high-intensity ultraviolet-A irradiation.
Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29685772     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

1.  Prospective 2-year study of accelerated pulsed transepithelial corneal crosslinking outcomes for Keratoconus.

Authors:  Mohammed Ziaei; Hans Vellara; Akilesh Gokul; Dipika Patel; Charles N J McGhee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The efficiency and safety of oxygen-supplemented accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking.

Authors:  Emre Aydın; Mehmet Gökhan Aslan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Sueko M Ng; Mark Ren; Kristina B Lindsley; Barbara S Hawkins; Irene C Kuo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-23

4.  [Stage-appropriate treatment of keratoconus].

Authors:  B Seitz; L Daas; L Hamon; K Xanthopoulou; S Goebels; C Spira-Eppig; S Razafimino; N Szentmáry; A Langenbucher; E Flockerzi
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 1.174

5.  Demarcation Line Depth in Epithelium-Off Corneal Cross-Linking Performed at the Slit Lamp.

Authors:  Farhad Hafezi; Nan-Ji Lu; Jad F Assaf; Nikki L Hafezi; Carina Koppen; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Paolo Vinciguerra; Mark Hillen; Shady T Awwad
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.