Victoria A Shaffer1, Elizabeth S Focella2, Andrew Hathaway1, Laura D Scherer1, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher3. 1. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, WI. 3. Department of Health Education and Health Behavior, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (CBSSM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
Background: How can we use stories from other people to promote better health experiences, improve judgments about health, and increase the quality of medical decisions without introducing bias, systematically persuading the listeners to change their attitudes, or altering behaviors in nonoptimal ways? More practically, should narratives be used in health education, promotion, or behavior change interventions? Method: In this article, we address these questions by conducting a narrative review of a diverse body of literature on narratives from several disciplines to gain a better understanding about what narratives do, including their role in communication, engagement, recall, persuasion, and health behavior change. We also review broad theories about information processing and persuasion from psychology and more specific models about narrative messaging found in the health communication and marketing literatures to provide insight into the processes by which narratives have their effect on health behavior. Results: To address major gaps in our theoretical understanding about how narratives work and what effects they will have on health behavior, we propose the Narrative Immersion Model, whose goal is to identify the parameters that predict the specific impact of a particular narrative (e.g. persuade, inform, comfort, etc.) based on the type of narrative message (e.g. process, experience, or outcome narrative). Further, the Narrative Immersion Model describes the magnitude of the effect as increasing through successive layers of engagement with the narrative: interest, identification, and immersion. Finally, the Narrative Immersion Model identifies characteristics of the narrative intervention that encourage greater immersion within a given narrative. Conclusions: We believe there are important communication gaps in areas areas of behavioral medicine that could be addressed with narratives; however, more work is needed in order to employ narrative messaging systematically. The Narrative Immersion Model advances our theoretical understanding about narrative processing and its subsequent effects on knowledge, attitudes, and behavior.
Background: How can we use stories from other people to promote better health experiences, improve judgments about health, and increase the quality of medical decisions without introducing bias, systematically persuading the listeners to change their attitudes, or altering behaviors in nonoptimal ways? More practically, should narratives be used in health education, promotion, or behavior change interventions? Method: In this article, we address these questions by conducting a narrative review of a diverse body of literature on narratives from several disciplines to gain a better understanding about what narratives do, including their role in communication, engagement, recall, persuasion, and health behavior change. We also review broad theories about information processing and persuasion from psychology and more specific models about narrative messaging found in the health communication and marketing literatures to provide insight into the processes by which narratives have their effect on health behavior. Results: To address major gaps in our theoretical understanding about how narratives work and what effects they will have on health behavior, we propose the Narrative Immersion Model, whose goal is to identify the parameters that predict the specific impact of a particular narrative (e.g. persuade, inform, comfort, etc.) based on the type of narrative message (e.g. process, experience, or outcome narrative). Further, the Narrative Immersion Model describes the magnitude of the effect as increasing through successive layers of engagement with the narrative: interest, identification, and immersion. Finally, the Narrative Immersion Model identifies characteristics of the narrative intervention that encourage greater immersion within a given narrative. Conclusions: We believe there are important communication gaps in areas areas of behavioral medicine that could be addressed with narratives; however, more work is needed in order to employ narrative messaging systematically. The Narrative Immersion Model advances our theoretical understanding about narrative processing and its subsequent effects on knowledge, attitudes, and behavior.
Authors: Austin S Kilaru; Jeanmarie Perrone; Catherine L Auriemma; Frances S Shofer; Frances K Barg; Zachary F Meisel Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Victoria A Shaffer; Laura D Scherer; Elizabeth S Focella; Amanda Hinnant; María E Len-Ríos; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher Journal: Health Commun Date: 2017-06-28
Authors: Angelo E Volandes; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; E Francis Cook; Shimon Shaykevich; Elmer D Abbo; Muriel R Gillick Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-04-23
Authors: Matthew W Kreuter; Trent D Buskirk; Kathleen Holmes; Eddie M Clark; Lou Robinson; Xuemei Si; Suchita Rath; Deborah Erwin; Anne Philipneri; Elisia Cohen; Katherine Mathews Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Angelo E Volandes; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Michael J Barry; Muriel R Gillick; Kenneth L Minaker; Yuchiao Chang; E Francis Cook; Elmer D Abbo; Areej El-Jawahri; Susan L Mitchell Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-05-28
Authors: Ellen Peters; Patrick Boyd; Linda D Cameron; Noshir Contractor; Michael A Diefenbach; Sara Fleszar-Pavlovic; Ezra Markowitz; Renee N Salas; Keri K Stephens Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Courtney L Scherr; Helen Lillie; Chelsea L Ratcliff; Melinda Krakow; Miao Liu; Jakob D Jensen Journal: Risk Anal Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 4.302
Authors: Nida Gizem Yılmaz; Julia C M Van Weert; Ellen Peters; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Annemarie Becker; Suresh Senan; Chris Dickhoff; Daniëlle R M Timmermans; Olga C Damman Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 2.583