Literature DB >> 29684001

One Hundred Fifteen Cases of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy at a Single Center.

Kwang-Woong Lee1, Suk Kyun Hong1, Kyung-Suk Suh1, Hyo-Sin Kim2, Sung-Woo Ahn3, Kyung Chul Yoon1, Jeong-Moo Lee1, Jae-Hyung Cho1, Hyeyoung Kim4, Nam-Joon Yi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pure laparoscopic approach to donor hepatectomy is being taken more often. However, few centers perform pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) because it requires a high level of surgical skill. Studies reporting initial outcomes of PLDRH may prompt further implementation of the technique and help reduce initial learning curves at other transplant centers. This study reports performance of PLDRH at a single center with extensive experience of adult living donor liver transplantation.
METHODS: Data from 115 donors (and recipients) who underwent PLDRH between November 2015 and June 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the initial (November 2015 to October 2016) and more recent (November 2016 to June 2017) periods.
RESULTS: During the initial period, 3 (2.6%) donors experienced complications greater than grade III on the Clavien-Dindo scale. By contrast, no donors developed complications during the recent period. The operative time (293.6 minutes vs 344.4 minutes; P < 0.001) and hospital stay (7.3 days vs 8.3 days; P = 0.002) were significantly shorter during the more recent period. Also, Δhemoglobin (Hb)%, calculated as ΔHb% = [(preoperative Hb - postoperative Hb)/preoperative Hb] × 100 (14.9% vs 17.5%; P = 0.042), and Δaspartate aminotransferase (AST)%, calculated as ΔAST% = [(peak AST - preoperative AST)/preoperative AST] × 100 (1048.9% vs 1316.6%; P = 0.009), were significantly lower during the recent period.
CONCLUSIONS: Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is both feasible and safe when performed at a center experienced in adult living donor liver transplantation. Performance of about 60 PLDRHs over 1 year is sufficient to standardize the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29684001     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  12 in total

1.  The learning curve in pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy: a cumulative sum analysis.

Authors:  Suk Kyun Hong; Kyung-Suk Suh; Kyung Chul Yoon; Jeong-Moo Lee; Jae-Hyung Cho; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  New Technique for Management of Separate Right Posterior and Anterior Portal Veins in Pure 3D Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Suk Kyun Hong; Kyung-Suk Suh; Jeong-Moo Lee; Jae-Hyung Cho; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Complications and outcomes of 890 living liver donor hepatectomies at a single center: risks of saving loved one's life.

Authors:  Yücel Yankol; Nesimi Mecit; Turan Kanmaz; Münci Kalayoğlu; Koray Acarlı
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-06-08

4.  Advances in the surgical outcomes of 300 cases of pure laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy divided into three periods of 100 cases: a single-centre case series.

Authors:  Eui Soo Han; Kyung-Suk Suh; Kwang-Woong Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; Suk Kyun Hong; Jeong-Moo Lee; Kwang Pyo Hong; Ming Yuan Tan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

5.  Extreme living donation: A single center simultaneous and sequential living liver-kidney donor experience with long-term outcomes under literature review.

Authors:  Yücel Yankol; Cihan Karataş; Turan Kanmaz; Burak Koçak; Münci Kalayoğlu; Koray Acarlı
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2021-09-28

Review 6.  Pure laparoscopic versus open donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michail Papoulas; Abdul Rahman Hakeem; Nigel Heaton; Krishna V Menon
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Pure 3D laparoscopy versus open right hemihepatectomy in a donor with type II and III portal vein variations.

Authors:  Kyungho Park; Ahmed Shehta; Jeong-Moo Lee; Suk Kyun Hong; Kyung Chul Yoon; Jae-Hyung Cho; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2019-11-29

8.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between pure laparoscopic surgery and open right hepatectomy in living donor hepatectomy: Propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Ji Seon Jeong; Wongook Wi; Yoon Joo Chung; Jong Man Kim; Gyu-Seong Choi; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Sangbin Han; Mi Sook Gwak; Gaab Soo Kim; Justin Sangwook Ko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Influence of Body Mass Index ≥30 on Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Suk Kyun Hong; Kyung-Suk Suh; Jae-Hyung Cho; Jeong-Moo Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 1.530

Review 10.  Laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy: Review of its current status.

Authors:  Shigeru Marubashi; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.