Literature DB >> 29683725

Reliabilities of Intraindividual Variability Indicators with Autocorrelated Longitudinal Data: Implications for Longitudinal Study Designs.

Han Du1, Lijuan Wang2.   

Abstract

Intraindividual variability can be measured by the intraindividual standard deviation ([Formula: see text]), intraindividual variance ([Formula: see text]), estimated hth-order autocorrelation coefficient ([Formula: see text]), and mean square successive difference ([Formula: see text]). Unresolved issues exist in the research on reliabilities of intraindividual variability indicators: (1) previous research only studied conditions with 0 autocorrelations in the longitudinal responses; (2) the reliabilities of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] have not been studied. The current study investigates reliabilities of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and the intraindividual mean, with autocorrelated longitudinal data. Reliability estimates of the indicators were obtained through Monte Carlo simulations. The impact of influential factors on reliabilities of the intraindividual variability indicators is summarized, and the reliabilities are compared across the indicators. Generally, all the studied indicators of intraindividual variability were more reliable with a more reliable measurement scale and more assessments. The reliabilities of [Formula: see text] were generally lower than those of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], the reliabilities of [Formula: see text] were usually between those of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] unless the scale reliability was large and/or the interindividual standard deviation in autocorrelation coefficients was large, and the reliabilities of the intraindividual mean were generally the highest. An R function is provided for planning longitudinal studies to ensure sufficient reliabilities of the intraindividual indicators are achieved.

Keywords:  Intraindividual variability; autocorrelation; reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29683725     DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1457939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  6 in total

1.  Estimating reliabilities and correcting for sampling error in indices of within-person dynamics derived from intensive longitudinal data.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-10-19

2.  Daily Stressors, Emotion Dynamics, and Inflammation in the MIDUS Cohort.

Authors:  Rebecca G Reed; Iris B Mauss; Nilam Ram; Suzanne C Segerstrom
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2021-10-18

3.  On Standardizing Within-Person Effects: Potential Problems of Global Standardization.

Authors:  Lijuan Wang; Qian Zhang; Scott E Maxwell; C S Bergeman
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  II. Indices of Pain Intensity Derived From Ecological Momentary Assessments and Their Relationships With Patient Functioning: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Joan E Broderick; Masakatsu Ono; Marcella May; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Comparability of Emotion Dynamics Derived From Ecological Momentary Assessments, Daily Diaries, and the Day Reconstruction Method: Observational Study.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Tania Gutsche; Hio Wa Mak; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  III. Detecting Treatment Effects in Clinical Trials With Different Indices of Pain Intensity Derived From Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Masakatsu Ono; Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 5.820

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.