Literature DB >> 33203516

II. Indices of Pain Intensity Derived From Ecological Momentary Assessments and Their Relationships With Patient Functioning: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

Stefan Schneider1, Doerte U Junghaenel2, Joan E Broderick2, Masakatsu Ono2, Marcella May2, Arthur A Stone3.   

Abstract

Pain intensity is a complex and dynamic experience. A focus on assessing patients' average pain levels may miss important aspects of pain that impact functioning in daily life. In this second of 3 articles investigating alternative indices of pain intensity derived from Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA), we examine the indices' associations with physical and psychosocial functioning. EMA data from 10 studies (2,660 patients) were reanalyzed to construct indices of Average Pain, Maximum Pain, Minimum Pain, Pain Variability, Time in High Pain, Time in Low Pain, Pain after Wake-up. Three sets of individual patient data meta-analyses examined 1) the test-retest reliability of the pain indices, 2) their convergent validity in relation to physical functioning, fatigue, depression, mental health, and social functioning, and 3) the incremental validity of alternative indices above Average Pain. Reliabilities approaching or exceeding a level of .7 were observed for all indices, and most correlated significantly with all functioning domains, with small to medium effect sizes. Controlling for Average Pain, Maximum Pain and Pain Variability uniquely predicted all functioning measures, and Time in High Pain predicted physical and social functioning. We suggest that alternative pain indices can provide new perspectives for understanding functioning in chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: Alternative summary measures of pain intensity derived from EMA have the potential to help better understand patients' pain experience. Utilizing EMA for the assessment of Maximum Pain, Pain Variability, and Time in High Pain may provide an enhanced window into the relationships between pain and patients' physical and psychosocial functioning.
Copyright © 2020 United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain intensity; ecological momentary assessment; individual patient data meta-analysis; intensive longitudinal data; pain indices

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33203516      PMCID: PMC8043976          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  69 in total

1.  Do depression and pain intensity interfere with physical activity in daily life in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain?

Authors:  Ivan P J Huijnen; Jeanine A Verbunt; Madelon L Peters; Philippe Delespaul; Hanne P J Kindermans; Jeffrey Roelofs; Marielle Goossens; Henk A M Seelen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

3.  Associations between psychosocial factors and pain intensity, physical functioning, and psychological functioning in patients with chronic pain: a cross-cultural comparison.

Authors:  Maria A Ferreira-Valente; José L Pais-Ribeiro; Mark P Jensen
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function.

Authors:  Ronald C Serlin; Tito R Mendoza; Yoshio Nakamura; Katherine R Edwards; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Assessment of pain: a community-based diary survey in the USA.

Authors:  Alan B Krueger; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Joan E Broderick; Joseph E Schwartz; Saul Shiffman; Leighann Litcher-Kelly; Pamela Calvanese
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Worst, average or current pain in the Brief Pain Inventory: which should be used to calculate the response to palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases?

Authors:  K Harris; K Li; C Flynn; E Chow
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 4.126

8.  Sidelining the mean: The relative variability index as a generic mean-corrected variability measure for bounded variables.

Authors:  Merijn Mestdagh; Madeline Pe; Wiebe Pestman; Stijn Verdonck; Peter Kuppens; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2018-04-12

9.  I. Indices of Pain Intensity Derived From Ecological Momentary Assessments: Rationale and Stakeholder Preferences.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Joan E Broderick; Roberta E Goldman; Doerte U Junghaenel; Alicia Bolton; Marcella May; Stefan Schneider
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Expanding options for developing outcome measures from momentary assessment data.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Joan E Broderick; Stefan Schneider; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.312

View more
  5 in total

1.  Reliabilities of Intra-Individual Mean and Intra-Individual Variability of Self-Reported Pain Derived From Ecological Momentary Assessments: Results From the Einstein Aging Study.

Authors:  Jinshil Hyun; Jiyue Qin; Cuiling Wang; Mindy J Katz; Jelena M Pavlovic; Carol A Derby; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  I. Indices of Pain Intensity Derived From Ecological Momentary Assessments: Rationale and Stakeholder Preferences.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Joan E Broderick; Roberta E Goldman; Doerte U Junghaenel; Alicia Bolton; Marcella May; Stefan Schneider
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Beyond Average: Providers' Assessments of Indices for Measuring Pain Intensity in Patients With Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Roberta E Goldman; Joan E Broderick; Doerte U Junghaenel; Alicia Bolton; Marcella May; Stefan Schneider; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-12

4.  Data visualization as an intervention for pediatric chronic pain: a pilot feasibility study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  Katelynn E Boerner; Unma Desai; Karon E MacLean; Tamara Munzner; Haley Foladare; Javed Gill; Tim F Oberlander
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-10-03

5.  III. Detecting Treatment Effects in Clinical Trials With Different Indices of Pain Intensity Derived From Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Masakatsu Ono; Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 5.820

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.