| Literature DB >> 29683720 |
Jonathan L Helm1, Jonas G Miller1, Sarah Kahle1, Natalie R Troxel1, Paul D Hastings1.
Abstract
Physiological synchrony within a dyad, or the degree of temporal correspondence between two individuals' physiological systems, has become a focal area of psychological research. Multiple methods have been used for measuring and modeling physiological synchrony. Each method extracts and analyzes different types of physiological synchrony, where 'type' refers to a specific manner through which two different physiological signals may correlate. Yet, to our knowledge, there is no documentation of the different methods, how each method corresponds to a specific type of synchrony, and the statistical assumptions embedded within each method. Hence, this article outlines several approaches for measuring and modeling physiological synchrony, connects each type of synchrony to a specific method, and identifies the assumptions that need to be satisfied for each method to appropriately extract each type of synchrony. Furthermore, this article demonstrates how to test for between-dyad differences of synchrony via inclusion of dyad-level (i.e., time-invariant) covariates. Finally, we complement each method with an empirical demonstration, as well as online supplemental material that contains Mplus code.Keywords: Physiological synchrony; multivariate growth models
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29683720 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1459292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Multivariate Behav Res ISSN: 0027-3171 Impact factor: 5.923