Literature DB >> 29683706

A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.

Barbara J Juhasz1, Melvin J Yap2, Akila Raoul1, Micaela Kaye1.   

Abstract

Word frequency is an important predictor of lexical-decision task performance. The current study further examined the role of this variable by exploring the influence of frequency trajectory. Frequency trajectory is measured by how often a word occurs in childhood relative to adulthood. Past research on the role of this variable in word recognition has produced equivocal results. In the current study, words were selected based on their frequencies in Grade 1 (child frequency) and Grade 13 (college frequency). In Experiment 1, four frequency trajectory conditions were factorially examined in a lexical-decision task with English words: high-to-high (world), high-to-low (uncle), low-to-high (brain) and low-to-low (opera). an interaction between Grade 1 and college frequency demonstrated that words in the low-to-high condition were processed significantly faster and more accurately than words in the low-to-low condition, whereas the high-to-high and high-to-low conditions did not differ significantly. In Experiment 2, an advantage for words with an increasing frequency trajectory was also supported in regression analyses on both lexical decision and naming times for 3,039 items selected from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007). This was replicated in Experiment 3, based on a regression analysis of 2,680 words from the British Lexicon Project (BLP; Keuleers, Lacey, Rastle, & Brysbaert, 2012). In all analyses, rated age-of-acquisition also significantly impacted word recognition. Together, the results suggest that the age at which a word is initially learned as well as its frequency trajectory across childhood impact performance in the lexical-decision task. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29683706     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  7 in total

1.  Re-assessing age of acquisition effects in recognition, free recall, and serial recall.

Authors:  Molly B Macmillan; Ian Neath; Aimeé M Surprenant
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02-08

2.  What makes domain knowledge difficult? Word usage frequency from SUBTLEX and dlexDB explains knowledge item difficulty.

Authors:  Ulrich Ludewig; Pascal Alscher; Xiaobin Chen; Nele McElvany
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-08-01

3.  When phonological neighborhood density both facilitates and impedes: Age of acquisition and name agreement interact with phonological neighborhood during word production.

Authors:  Hossein Karimi; Michele Diaz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-08

4.  Objective ages of acquisition for 3300+ simplified Chinese characters.

Authors:  Zhenguang G Cai; Shuting Huang; Zebo Xu; Nan Zhao
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06-22

5.  Age of acquisition of 299 words in seven languages: American English, Czech, Gaelic, Lebanese Arabic, Malay, Persian and Western Armenian.

Authors:  Magdalena Łuniewska; Zofia Wodniecka; Carol A Miller; Filip Smolík; Morna Butcher; Vasiliki Chondrogianni; Edith Kouba Hreich; Camille Messarra; Rogayah A Razak; Jeanine Treffers-Daller; Ngee Thai Yap; Layal Abboud; Ali Talebi; Maribel Gureghian; Laurice Tuller; Ewa Haman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Croatian psycholinguistic database: Estimates for 6000 nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs.

Authors:  Anita Peti-Stantić; Maja Anđel; Vedrana Gnjidić; Gordana Keresteš; Nikola Ljubešić; Irina Masnikosa; Mirjana Tonković; Jelena Tušek; Jana Willer-Gold; Mateusz-Milan Stanojević
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-26

7.  Effects of word familiarity and receptive vocabulary size on speech-in-noise recognition among young adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Meredith D Braza; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio; Ryan W McCreery; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.