BACKGROUND: Being able to detect the presence of autoantibodies to interferon (IFN)-γ in serum is essential for evaluating patients with suspected adult-onset immunodeficiency (AOID) with unusual intracellular infections. Most reported patients with AOID have been Asian, although the exact prevalence of this illness is unknown. To date, no standard assay exists to detect autoantibodies to IFN-γ. An easy-to-use, low-cost assay that can be performed in any laboratory would be a valuable tool for clinical management of AOID, as well as better reveal its prevalence. METHODS: Our experimental study exploited a dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Dot-ELISA) strip to detect autoantibodies to IFN-γ. Sera from 66 HIV-negative patients having autoantibodies to IFN-γ as determined by indirect ELISA were tested. RESULTS: Dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was sensitive (100%) and specific (94.5%), with a positive predictive value of 97.6% and a negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: This simple method provides prompt qualitative results that can be read visually and used in facilities with limited testing capabilities.
BACKGROUND: Being able to detect the presence of autoantibodies to interferon (IFN)-γ in serum is essential for evaluating patients with suspected adult-onset immunodeficiency (AOID) with unusual intracellular infections. Most reported patients with AOID have been Asian, although the exact prevalence of this illness is unknown. To date, no standard assay exists to detect autoantibodies to IFN-γ. An easy-to-use, low-cost assay that can be performed in any laboratory would be a valuable tool for clinical management of AOID, as well as better reveal its prevalence. METHODS: Our experimental study exploited a dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Dot-ELISA) strip to detect autoantibodies to IFN-γ. Sera from 66 HIV-negative patients having autoantibodies to IFN-γ as determined by indirect ELISA were tested. RESULTS: Dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was sensitive (100%) and specific (94.5%), with a positive predictive value of 97.6% and a negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: This simple method provides prompt qualitative results that can be read visually and used in facilities with limited testing capabilities.
Authors: Sarah K Browne; Peter D Burbelo; Ploenchan Chetchotisakd; Yupin Suputtamongkol; Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul; Pamela A Shaw; Jennifer L Kirk; Kamonwan Jutivorakool; Rifat Zaman; Li Ding; Amy P Hsu; Smita Y Patel; Kenneth N Olivier; Viraphong Lulitanond; Piroon Mootsikapun; Siriluck Anunnatsiri; Nasikarn Angkasekwinai; Boonmee Sathapatayavongs; Po-Ren Hsueh; Chi-Chang Shieh; Margaret R Brown; Wanna Thongnoppakhun; Reginald Claypool; Elizabeth P Sampaio; Charin Thepthai; Duangdao Waywa; Camilla Dacombe; Yona Reizes; Adrian M Zelazny; Paul Saleeb; Lindsey B Rosen; Allen Mo; Michael Iadarola; Steven M Holland Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 91.245