Literature DB >> 29682438

Evaluating a Space-Based Indicator of Surface Ozone-NO x -VOC Sensitivity Over Midlatitude Source Regions and Application to Decadal Trends.

Xiaomeng Jin1, Arlene M Fiore1, Lee T Murray2, Lukas C Valin3, Lok N Lamsal4,5, Bryan Duncan4, K Folkert Boersma6,7, Isabelle De Smedt8, Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad9, Kelly Chance9, Gail S Tonnesen10.   

Abstract

Determining effective strategies for mitigating surface ozone (O3) pollution requires knowledge of the relative ambient concentrations of its precursors, NO x , and VOCs. The space-based tropospheric column ratio of formaldehyde to NO2 (FNR) has been used as an indicator to identify NO x -limited versus NO x -saturated O3 formation regimes. Quantitative use of this indicator ratio is subject to three major uncertainties: (1) the split between NO x -limited and NO x -saturated conditions may shift in space and time, (2) the ratio of the vertically integrated column may not represent the near-surface environment, and (3) satellite products contain errors. We use the GEOS-Chem global chemical transport model to evaluate the quantitative utility of FNR observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument over three northern midlatitude source regions. We find that FNR in the model surface layer is a robust predictor of the simulated near-surface O3 production regime. Extending this surface-based predictor to a column-based FNR requires accounting for differences in the HCHO and NO2 vertical profiles. We compare four combinations of two OMI HCHO and NO2 retrievals with modeled FNR. The spatial and temporal correlations between the modeled and satellite-derived FNR vary with the choice of NO2 product, while the mean offset depends on the choice of HCHO product. Space-based FNR indicates that the spring transition to NO x -limited regimes has shifted at least a month earlier over major cities (e.g., New York, London, and Seoul) between 2005 and 2015. This increase in NO x sensitivity implies that NO x emission controls will improve O3 air quality more now than it would have a decade ago.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29682438      PMCID: PMC5906809          DOI: 10.1002/2017JD026720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos        ISSN: 2169-897X            Impact factor:   4.261


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of source apportionment and source sensitivity of ozone in a three-dimensional air quality model.

Authors:  Alan M Dunker; Greg Yarwood; Jerome P Ortmann; Gary M Wilson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Development of a United States-Mexico Emissions Inventory for the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) Study.

Authors:  Hampden Kuhns; Eladio M Knipping; Jeffrey M Vukovich
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Adjoint sensitivity analysis of ozone nonattainment over the continental United States.

Authors:  Amir Hakami; John H Seinfeld; Tianfeng Chai; Youhua Tang; Gregory R Carmichael; Adrian Sandu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Impacts of biogenic emissions of VOC and NOx on tropospheric ozone during summertime in eastern China.

Authors:  Qin'geng Wang; Zhiwei Han; Tijian Wang; Renjian Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Sensitivity and linearity analysis of ozone in East Asia: the effects of domestic emission and intercontinental transport.

Authors:  Joshua S Fu; Xinyi Dong; Yang Gao; David C Wong; Yun Fat Lam
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Daniel S Cohan; Amir Hakami; Yongtao Hu; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Human health effects of air pollution.

Authors:  Marilena Kampa; Elias Castanas
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Why do Models Overestimate Surface Ozone in the Southeastern United States?

Authors:  Katherine R Travis; Daniel J Jacob; Jenny A Fisher; Patrick S Kim; Eloise A Marais; Lei Zhu; Karen Yu; Christopher C Miller; Robert M Yantosca; Melissa P Sulprizio; Anne M Thompson; Paul O Wennberg; John D Crounse; Jason M St Clair; Ronald C Cohen; Joshua L Laughner; Jack E Dibb; Samuel R Hall; Kirk Ullmann; Glenn M Wolfe; Illana B Pollack; Jeff Peischl; Jonathan A Neuman; Xianliang Zhou
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.133

9.  Reductions in nitrogen oxides over Europe driven by environmental policy and economic recession.

Authors:  Patricia Castellanos; K Folkert Boersma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Revising the slant column density retrieval of nitrogen dioxide observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument.

Authors:  S Marchenko; N A Krotkov; L N Lamsal; E A Celarier; W H Swartz; E J Bucsela
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.261

View more
  15 in total

1.  Inferring Changes in Summertime Surface Ozone-NOx-VOC Chemistry over U.S. Urban Areas from Two Decades of Satellite and Ground-Based Observations.

Authors:  Xiaomeng Jin; Arlene Fiore; K Folkert Boersma; Isabelle De Smedt; Lukas Valin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  The Dawn of Geostationary Air Quality Monitoring: Case Studies from Seoul and Los Angeles.

Authors:  Laura Judd; Jassim Al-Saadi; Lukas Valin; R Bradley Pierce; Kai Yang; Scott Janz; Matt Kowalewski; James Szykman; Martin Tiefengraber; Moritz Mueller
Journal:  Front Environ Sci       Date:  2018

3.  Changes in the ozone chemical regime over the contiguous United States inferred by the inversion of NOx and VOC emissions using satellite observation.

Authors:  Jia Jung; Yunsoo Choi; Seyedali Mousavinezhad; Daiwen Kang; Jincheol Park; Arman Pouyaei; Masoud Ghahremanloo; Mahmoudreza Momeni; Hyuncheol Kim
Journal:  Atmos Res       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Changes in Ozone Chemical Sensitivity in the United States from 2007 to 2016.

Authors:  Shannon Koplitz; Heather Simon; Barron Henderson; Jennifer Liljegren; Gail Tonnesen; Andrew Whitehill; Benjamin Wells
Journal:  ACS Environ Au       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  Volatile Chemical Product Enhancements to Criteria Pollutants in the United States.

Authors:  Karl M Seltzer; Benjamin N Murphy; Elyse A Pennington; Chris Allen; Kevin Talgo; Havala O T Pye
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 11.357

6.  Development and application of observable response indicators for design of an effective ozone and fine particle pollution control strategy in China.

Authors:  Jia Xing; Dian Ding; Shuxiao Wang; Zhaoxin Dong; James T Kelly; Carey Jang; Yun Zhu; Jiming Hao
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 6.133

7.  Air pollution impacts of COVID-19-related containment measures.

Authors:  Guillaume P Chossière; Haofeng Xu; Yash Dixit; Stewart Isaacs; Sebastian D Eastham; Florian Allroggen; Raymond L Speth; Steven R H Barrett
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Comprehensive Insights Into O3 Changes During the COVID-19 From O3 Formation Regime and Atmospheric Oxidation Capacity.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhu; James Poetzscher; Juanyong Shen; Siyu Wang; Peng Wang; Hongliang Zhang
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.720

9.  Unexpected slowdown of US pollutant emission reduction in the past decade.

Authors:  Zhe Jiang; Brian C McDonald; Helen Worden; John R Worden; Kazuyuki Miyazaki; Zhen Qu; Daven K Henze; Dylan B A Jones; Avelino F Arellano; Emily V Fischer; Liye Zhu; K Folkert Boersma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Future ozone-related acute excess mortality under climate and population change scenarios in China: A modeling study.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Arlene M Fiore; Renjie Chen; Leiwen Jiang; Bryan Jones; Alexandra Schneider; Annette Peters; Jun Bi; Haidong Kan; Patrick L Kinney
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.