Literature DB >> 35370333

Changes in the ozone chemical regime over the contiguous United States inferred by the inversion of NOx and VOC emissions using satellite observation.

Jia Jung1, Yunsoo Choi1, Seyedali Mousavinezhad1, Daiwen Kang2, Jincheol Park1, Arman Pouyaei1, Masoud Ghahremanloo1, Mahmoudreza Momeni1, Hyuncheol Kim3,4.   

Abstract

To investigate changes in the ozone (O3) chemical production regime over the contiguous United States (CONUS) with accurate knowledge of concentrations of its precursors, we applied an inverse modeling technique with Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and total formaldehyde (HCHO) retrieval products in the summers of 2011, 2014, and 2017, years in which United States National Emission Inventory were based. The inclusion of dynamic chemical lateral boundary conditions and lightning-induced nitric oxide emissions significantly account for the contribution of background sources in the free troposphere. Satellite-constrained nitrogen oxide (NOx) and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) emissions mitigate the discrepancy between satellite and modeled columns: the inversion suggested 2.33-2.84 (1.07-1.34) times higher NOx over the CONUS (over urban regions) and 0.28-0.81 times fewer NMVOCs emissions over the southeastern United States. The model-derived HCHO/NO2 column ratio shows gradual spatial changes in the O3 production regime near urban cores relative to previously defined threshold values representing NOx and VOC sensitive conditions. We also found apparent shifts from the NOx-saturated regime to the transition regime (or the transition regime to the NOx-limited regime) over the major cities in the western United States. In contrast, rural areas, especially in the east-southeastern United States, exhibit a decreased HCHO/NO2 column ratio by -1.30 ± 1.71 with a reduction in HCHO column primarily driven by meteorology, becoming sensitive to VOC emissions. Results show that incorporating satellite observations into numerical modeling could help policymakers implement appropriate emission control policies for O3 pollution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMAQ-DDM; HCHO/NO2 factor; Inverse modeling; OMI; Ozone chemical regime

Year:  2022        PMID: 35370333      PMCID: PMC8972085          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Res        ISSN: 0169-8095            Impact factor:   5.369


  21 in total

1.  Impacts of different characterizations of large-scale background on simulated regional-scale ozone over the continental United States.

Authors:  Christian Hogrefe; Peng Liu; George Pouliot; Rohit Mathur; Shawn Roselle; Johannes Flemming; Meiyun Lin; Rokjin J Park
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 6.133

2.  Identification of chemical fingerprints in long-range transport of burning induced upper tropospheric ozone from Colorado to the North Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Wonbae Jeon; Yunsoo Choi; Amir Hossein Souri; Anirban Roy; Lijun Diao; Shuai Pan; Hwa Woon Lee; Soon-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Extending the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System to Hemispheric Scales: Overview of Process Considerations and Initial Applications.

Authors:  Rohit Mathur; Jia Xing; Robert Gilliam; Golam Sarwar; Christian Hogrefe; Jonathan Pleim; George Pouliot; Shawn Roselle; Tanya L Spero; David C Wong; Jeffrey Young
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

4.  Inferring Changes in Summertime Surface Ozone-NOx-VOC Chemistry over U.S. Urban Areas from Two Decades of Satellite and Ground-Based Observations.

Authors:  Xiaomeng Jin; Arlene Fiore; K Folkert Boersma; Isabelle De Smedt; Lukas Valin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Stratospheric intrusion-influenced ozone air quality exceedances investigated in the NASA MERRA-2 Reanalysis.

Authors:  K E Knowland; L E Ott; B N Duncan; K Wargan
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 4.720

6.  Why do Models Overestimate Surface Ozone in the Southeastern United States?

Authors:  Katherine R Travis; Daniel J Jacob; Jenny A Fisher; Patrick S Kim; Eloise A Marais; Lei Zhu; Karen Yu; Christopher C Miller; Robert M Yantosca; Melissa P Sulprizio; Anne M Thompson; Paul O Wennberg; John D Crounse; Jason M St Clair; Ronald C Cohen; Joshua L Laughner; Jack E Dibb; Samuel R Hall; Kirk Ullmann; Glenn M Wolfe; Illana B Pollack; Jeff Peischl; Jonathan A Neuman; Xianliang Zhou
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.133

7.  Surface ozone response to satellite-constrained NOx emission adjustments and its implications.

Authors:  Changhan Bae; Hyun Cheol Kim; Byeong-Uk Kim; Soontae Kim
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Role of sea fog over the Yellow Sea on air quality with the direct effect of aerosols.

Authors:  Jia Jung; Yunsoo Choi; David C Wong; Delaney Nelson; Sojin Lee
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.261

9.  Disentangling the Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdowns on Urban NO2 From Natural Variability.

Authors:  Daniel L Goldberg; Susan C Anenberg; Debora Griffin; Chris A McLinden; Zifeng Lu; David G Streets
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 5.576

10.  Significant ground-level ozone attributed to lightning-induced nitrogen oxides during summertime over the Mountain West States.

Authors:  Daiwen Kang; Rohit Mathur; George A Pouliot; Robert C Gilliam; David C Wong
Journal:  NPJ Clim Atmos Sci       Date:  2020-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.