Literature DB >> 29682294

DuraGraft vascular conduit preservation solution in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of a within-patient randomised multicentre trial.

Walid Ben Ali1, Pierre Voisine2, Peter Skov Olsen3, Hugues Jeanmart4, Nicolas Noiseux1, Tracy Goeken5, Vilas Satishchandran5, Filippo Cademartiri6, Garry Cutter7, Dave Veerasingam8, Craig Brown9, Maximilian Y Emmert10, Louis P Perrault1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) remain the most often used conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, they are prone to vein graft disease (VGD) during follow-up, which may compromise clinical outcomes. Injury to the SVG endothelium during harvesting and storage promotes neointimal hyperplasia that can advance to atherosclerosis characterised by SVG failure. This trial investigates the potential benefit of DuraGraft, a novel, one-time intraoperative graft treatment developed to efficiently protect the structural and functional integrity of the vascular endothelium, on the development and progression of VGD in CABG patients. Methods and analysis: This ongoing prospective randomised, double-blinded multicentre trial (NCT02272582/NCT02774824) includes patients undergoing isolated CABG requiring at least two SVGs. It compares the impact of DuraGraft, a novel treatment against VGD versus the standard-of-care (SOC; heparinised saline) using a within-patient randomisation (with one SVG treated with DuraGraft and the other treated with SOC). Besides clinical assessments, patients undergo longitudinal 64-slice or better multidetector CT (MDCT) angiography of paired grafts (within each patient) at 4-6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. Primary endpoints will be the magnitude of change in mean wall thickness and lumen diameter (stenosis) of paired grafts, at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Besides the evaluation of overall safety, longitudinal assessment of each graft (secondary endpoint) is performed in order to obtain insight into graft behaviour after CABG. Enrolment of 119 patients was successfully completed, and analysis of MDCT angiography follow-up is ongoing with the completed analysis becoming available by end of first quarter of 2018. Ethics and dissemination: The regional ethics committees have approved the trial. Results will be submitted for publication. Clinical trial identifier: NCT02272582 and NCT02774824.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery bypass grafting; endothelial damage inhibitor; myocardial infarction; patency; saphenous vein graft; vein graft failure; vein graft treatment

Year:  2018        PMID: 29682294      PMCID: PMC5905829          DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Heart        ISSN: 2053-3624


  21 in total

Review 1.  Storage of saphenous vein grafts prior to coronary artery bypass grafting: is autologous whole blood more effective than saline in preserving graft function?

Authors:  Maria Tsakok; Sarah Montgomery-Taylor; Teresa Tsakok
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-29

2.  Lumen loss in the first year in saphenous vein grafts is predominantly a result of negative remodeling of the whole vessel rather than a result of changes in wall thickness.

Authors:  George T Lau; Lloyd J Ridley; Paul G Bannon; Louise A Wong; Joseph Trieu; David B Brieger; Harry C Lowe; Ben S Freedman; Leonard Kritharides
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Improvement of the cold storage of blood vessels with a vascular preservation solution. Study in porcine aortic segments.

Authors:  Timo Wille; Herbert de Groot; Ursula Rauen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Preservation solution impacts physiologic function and cellular viability of human saphenous vein graft.

Authors:  Eric S Wise; Kyle M Hocking; Susan Eagle; Tarek Absi; Padmini Komalavilas; Joyce Cheung-Flynn; Colleen M Brophy
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Steven Goldman; Gulshan K Sethi; William Holman; Hoang Thai; Edward McFalls; Herbert B Ward; Rosemary F Kelly; Birger Rhenman; Gareth H Tobler; Faisal G Bakaeen; Joseph Huh; Ernesto Soltero; Mohammed Moursi; Miguel Haime; Michael Crittenden; Vigneshwar Kasirajan; Michelle Ratliff; Stewart Pett; Anand Irimpen; William Gunnar; Donald Thomas; Stephen Fremes; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Lynn Harrison; Todd H Wagner; Yajie Wang; Lori Planting; Meredith Miller; Yvette Rodriguez; Elizabeth Juneman; Douglass Morrison; Mary Kaye Pierce; Sandra Kreamer; Mei-Chiung Shih; Kelvin Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Stephan D Fihn; Julius M Gardin; Jonathan Abrams; Kathleen Berra; James C Blankenship; Apostolos P Dallas; Pamela S Douglas; Joanne M Foody; Thomas C Gerber; Alan L Hinderliter; Spencer B King; Paul D Kligfield; Harlan M Krumholz; Raymond Y K Kwong; Michael J Lim; Jane A Linderbaum; Michael J Mack; Mark A Munger; Richard L Prager; Joseph F Sabik; Leslee J Shaw; Joanna D Sikkema; Craig R Smith; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Sankey V Williams; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Intraoperative Vein Graft Preservation: What Is the Solution?

Authors:  Lavinia C Woodward; Charalambos Antoniades; David P Taggart
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Even short-time storage in physiological saline solution impairs endothelial vascular function of saphenous vein grafts.

Authors:  Manuel Wilbring; Sems Malte Tugtekin; Birgit Zatschler; Anette Ebner; Hermann Reichenspurner; Klaus Matschke; Andreas Deussen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 9.  Vein graft failure: from pathophysiology to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Margreet R de Vries; Karin H Simons; J Wouter Jukema; Jerry Braun; Paul H A Quax
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Ninos Samano; Håkan Geijer; Mats Liden; Stephen Fremes; Lennart Bodin; Domingos Souza
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Saphenous vein grafts in contemporary coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Etem Caliskan; Domingos Ramos de Souza; Andreas Böning; Oliver J Liakopoulos; Yeong-Hoon Choi; John Pepper; C Michael Gibson; Louis P Perrault; Randall K Wolf; Ki-Bong Kim; Maximilian Y Emmert
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  A novel endothelial damage inhibitor for the treatment of vascular conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: protocol and rationale for the European, multicentre, prospective, observational DuraGraft registry.

Authors:  Etem Caliskan; Sigrid Sandner; Martin Misfeld; Jose Aramendi; Sacha P Salzberg; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Vilas Satishchandran; Geeta Iyer; Louis P Perrault; Andreas Böning; Maximilian Y Emmert
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  Efficacy of Intraoperative Vein Graft Storage Solutions in Preserving Endothelial Cell Integrity during Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Authors:  Francesca Toto; Tiziano Torre; Lucia Turchetto; Viviana Lo Cicero; Sabrina Soncin; Catherine Klersy; Stefanos Demertzis; Enrico Ferrari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.