Literature DB >> 26282605

The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: A randomized trial.

Ninos Samano1, Håkan Geijer2, Mats Liden2, Stephen Fremes3, Lennart Bodin4, Domingos Souza5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates whether the no-touch (NT) vein graft, at a mean time of 16 years, maintains a significantly higher patency rate than conventional (C) vein grafts and still has patency comparable to that of the left internal thoracic artery (LITA).
METHODS: A total of 156 patients accepted for coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups. In the C group, the saphenous vein (SV) was stripped and distended. In the intermediate group, the SV was stripped but not distended. In the NT group, the SV was neither stripped nor distended, but rather harvested with a fat pedicle. This study is an angiographic follow-up of the C and NT groups, at a mean time of 16 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included (C group = 27; NT group = 27). In all, 72 and 75 vein grafts were completed in groups C and NT, respectively. Crude SV graft patency was 64% in the C group versus 83% in the NT group (P = .03), which was similar to the patency of the LITA (88%). The harvesting technique had a major impact on the patency with a hazard ratio for occlusion of 1.83 for the C group (P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Harvesting the SV with the NT technique conferred, at a mean time of 16 years, a significantly higher patency than the conventional technique that was still comparable to that of the LITA.
Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery bypass grafting; left internal thoracic artery; saphenous vein graft

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26282605     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  44 in total

1.  No-touch saphenous vein graft harvesting technique for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Yu Inaba; Masataka Yamazaki; Masatoshi Ohono; Kentaro Yamashita; Hiroaki Izumida; Kanako Hayashi; Tatsuo Takahashi; Naritaka Kimura; Tsutomu Ito; Hideyuki Shimizu
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-02

2.  No-touch vein grafts and the destiny of venous revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting-a 25th anniversary perspective.

Authors:  Ninos Samano; Michael Dashwood; Domingos Souza
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09

Review 3.  Conduits Used in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Review of Morphological Studies.

Authors:  Brenda Martínez-González; Cynthia Guadalupe Reyes-Hernández; Alejandro Quiroga-Garza; Víctor E Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Claudia N Esparza-Hernández; Rodrigo E Elizondo-Omaña; Santos Guzmán-López
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 4.  Cardiac surgery 2017 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Hristo Kirov; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Rauf Safarov; Mahmoud Diab; Steffen Bargenda; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Does No-Touch Technique Better than Conventional or Intermediate Saphenous Vein Harvest Techniques for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Elshafay; Ahmed Hesham Bendary; Huan Thanh Vuong; Ahmed Reda Ahmed; Mohamed Ashraf Mokhtar; Ali Lotfy Soliman; Nguyen Lam Vuong; Israa Atia El Bestawi; Nirmeen Atef Abdallah; Vi Tuong Vu; Kenji Hirayama; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  No-touch saphenous vein as an important conduit of choice in coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  Tomislav Kopjar; Michael Richard Dashwood; Mats Dreifaldt; Domingos Ramos de Souza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Cardiac surgery 2015 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Constanze Strüning; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Yasin Essa; Hristo Kirov; Mahmoud Diab; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Surgical Aspects of No-Touch Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting in CABG: Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up at 3 Months.

Authors:  Ninos Samano; Bruno Botelho Pinheiro; Domingos Souza
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb

9.  DuraGraft vascular conduit preservation solution in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of a within-patient randomised multicentre trial.

Authors:  Walid Ben Ali; Pierre Voisine; Peter Skov Olsen; Hugues Jeanmart; Nicolas Noiseux; Tracy Goeken; Vilas Satishchandran; Filippo Cademartiri; Garry Cutter; Dave Veerasingam; Craig Brown; Maximilian Y Emmert; Louis P Perrault
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-04-13

Review 10.  Vein graft failure: from pathophysiology to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Margreet R de Vries; Karin H Simons; J Wouter Jukema; Jerry Braun; Paul H A Quax
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.