Literature DB >> 29682253

In vitro evaluation of the post-space depth reading with an intraoral scanner (IOS) compared to a traditional silicon impression.

A Pinto1, L Arcuri1, P Carosi2, R Nardi2, A Libonati3, L Ottria2, V Campanella2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the depth and quality of the post-space reading, using an IOS without scan-post, compared to a traditional silicon technique.
METHODS: Six extracted bicuspids were decoronated and endodontically treated. After having prepared the space for the posts, a structure in pink acrylic resin was created with two resin elements. At the center of the structure one sample was put at a time. Digital and traditional impressions were taken for each sample.Digital impressions were developed through the Computer-aided design (CAD) software in order to integrate the scanner results into a three-dimensional grid to make the measurements. A K-file was used to measure the length of the post-space of each sample obtained through the traditional silicon impression and subsequently the measurement results were reported on a millimeter gauge. Furthermore, an assessment of the width of the entrances of the post-spaces was carried out.
RESULTS: The mean reading depth discrepancy expressed in percentages (19.58%) indicates that the digital impression with current technologies fails to impress clearly the post-space. Standard deviation of the data expressed in percentage is 13.89, suggesting that the values were not similar to each other. In two cases the digital technique has achieved less than 10% difference compared to the traditional technique, but there have been also cases in which the variation in depth has reached almost 40%.The samples that showed the minor discrepancy between the two techniques expressed the widest post-space entrance.
CONCLUSIONS: In this in vitro study, the application of the IOS for the post-space reading in order to deliver an anatomic post has been proven to be still not reliable, as there are still depth reading limitations for the narrow root channels. In fact, in this type of channels it is difficult to reach with the light beam of the IOS the deepest areas of the post-space, with a consequent incomplete post-space reading.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cad-Cam; anatomic post; digital impression; intraoral scanner; post space

Year:  2017        PMID: 29682253      PMCID: PMC5892666          DOI: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)        ISSN: 1974-5648


  42 in total

1.  Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts.

Authors:  M Ferrari; A Vichi; F Mannocci; P N Mason
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 2.  Restoration of endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Steven M Morgano; Antonio H C Rodrigues; Carlos Eduardo Sabrosa
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04

3.  Use of a CAD/CAM-fabricated glass fiber post and core to restore fractured anterior teeth: A clinical report.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Xu-Liang Deng; Xin-Zhi Wang
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: the seven keys to success.

Authors:  Nadim Z Baba; Charles J Goodacre; Tony Daher
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

5.  Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Le Bell; Lippo V J Lassila; Ilkka Kangasniemi; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A study of mandibular and maxillary root widths to determine dowel size.

Authors:  M A Tilk; T J Lommel; H Gerstein
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  D Assif; C Gorfil
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 8.  Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies).

Authors:  Didier Dietschi; Olivier Duc; Ivo Krejci; Avishai Sadan
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.677

9.  Fracture strength of flared bovine roots restored with different intraradicular posts.

Authors:  Victor Grover Rene Clavijo; José Maurício dos Santos Nunes Reis; William Kabbach; André Luis Faria e Silva; Osmir Batista de Oliveira Junior; Marcelo Ferrarezi de Andrade
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Comparative evaluation of retention of prefabricated and conventional cast post: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Suchismita Choudhary; Zubeda Begum; Prashant Choudhary; Siddhi Tripathi
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow.

Authors:  Robert Leven; Alexander Schmidt; Roland Binder; Marian Kampschulte; Jonas Vogler; Bernd Wöstmann; Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  CAD/CAM Customized Glass Fiber Post and Core With Digital Intraoral Impression: A Case Report.

Authors:  Antonio Libonati; Virginia Di Taranto; Gianni Gallusi; Edoardo Montemurro; Vincenzo Campanella
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2020-02-10

3.  Influence of Implant Scanbody Wear on the Accuracy of Digital Impression for Complete-Arch: A Randomized In Vitro Trial.

Authors:  Lorenzo Arcuri; Fabrizio Lio; Veronica Campana; Vincenzo Mazzetti; Francesca Romana Federici; Alessandra Nardi; Massimo Galli
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Effect of freshly placed core buildup composites on setting of silicon impression materials.

Authors:  Mohammad A Al-Rabab'ah; Muhanad M Hatamleh; Sandra Al-Tarawneh; Ahmad El-Ma'aita; Ibrahim Abu Tahun; Issam S Jalham
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.