| Literature DB >> 29681978 |
Estefanny Ruiz García1, Eliana Alviárez Gutierrez2, Fabiana Cristina Silveira Alves de Melo1, Rômulo Dias Novaes3, Reggiani Vilela Gonçalves1.
Abstract
The hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. It occurs primarily as manifestation of other pathological processes, such as viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, and toxin exposure that affect directly the cellular process. Studies were selected from PubMed and Scopus databases according to the PRISMA statement. The research filters were constructed using three parameters: flavonoids, hepatocellular carcinoma, and animal model. The bias analysis of the 34 selected works was done using the ARRIVE guidelines. The most widely used flavonoid in the studies was epigallocatechin gallate extracted from green tea. In general, the treatment with different flavonoids presented inhibition of tumor growth and antiangiogenic, antimetastatic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities. The bias analysis evidenced the absence of methodological processes in all studies, such as the age or weight of the animals, the method of flavonoids' extraction, or the experimental designs, analytical methods, and outcome measures. It has been known that flavonoids have a protective effect against HCC. However, the absence or incomplete characterization of the animal models, treatment protocols, and phytochemical and toxicity analyses impaired the internal validity of the individual studies, making it difficult to determine the effectiveness of plant-derived products in the treatment of HCC.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29681978 PMCID: PMC5850900 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6328970
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Description of the main characteristics of the studies using flavonoids in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in murine models.
| Ref. | Country | Article | Plant family/species | Used part of plant | Flavonoids type | Extraction and purification method |
| Animal model/strain | Sex | Age/weight | Administration/ | Induction of carcinoma concentration/ | Tumor measurement/ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wan et al., 2014 [ | China | Preparation of morusin from | Moraceae/ | Root bark | Isoprenylated flavone (morusin) | Ethanol extraction/Sephadex gel LH-20 and RF-HPLC | ? | Mice/SPF ICR | ♂ | 3–5 weeks/18–20 g | Intraperitoneal/ | Transplanted H22 cells | Weight of tumor/2 weeks | H&E, qRT-PCR (P53, survivin, cyclin D1, caspase-3, NF-K |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Shu et al., 2014 [ | China | Kurarinol induces hepatocellular carcinoma cell apoptosis through suppressing cellular signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling | Leguminosae/ | Root | Kushenol H, kurarinol, norkurarinol, kushenol N, kurarinone | Ethanol extraction, HPLC and Sephadex LH-20 column | HepG2, Huh-7, Bel-7402 cells humans, HL-7702, H22 cells mouse | Mice/Kunming | ♂ | ?/18–22 g | Intraperitoneal/ | Transplant of H22 cells | Weight of tumor/experiment end | Serum (white blood, red blood cells, platelets, ALT, AST, BUN, uric acid, and CK), TUNEL, immunohistochemistry (STAT3) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Wang et al., 2014 [ | China | Liquiritigenin induces tumor cell death through mitogen-activated protein kinase- (MPAKs-) mediated pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma cells | ?/ | ? | Liquiritigenin (LQ) | Purchased | PLC/PRF/5, HepG2 human cells | Mice/BALB/cA nude | ♂ | 5 weeks/? | Intraperitoneal/ | Transplanted PLC/PRF/5 | Volume and diameters of tumor (mm3), body weight/every day | ? |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Zhang et al., 2014 [ | China | Dihydromyricetin promotes hepatocellular carcinoma regression via a p53 activation-dependent mechanism | ?/ | ? | Dihydromyricetin (DHM) | Purchased | HepG2, SMMC-7721, HL7702, L02 cells, primary cell: 4401, 4403, 1204 | Mice/BALB/cA nude | ♂ | 8–10 weeks/? | ?/daily for 21 days | Transplanted HepG2 cells | ? | Immunohistochemistry (P53) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Darweish et al., 2014 [ | Egypt | Chemopreventive and hepatoprotective effects of epigallocatechin gallate against hepatocellular carcinoma: role of heparan sulfate proteoglycans pathway | ?/ | ? | Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) | ? | HepG2 cell | Rats/Sprague Dawley | ♂ | ?/180–200 g | ?/twice for week for 16 days | Thioacetamide (200 mg/Kg b.w.) | ? | H&E, immunohistochemistry (HSPGs), qRT-PCR (FGF-2), in serum (AST, albumin, and bilirubin), enzymatic determination (MDA, SOD, MPO, ELISA MMP-9, HSPGs, AFP, and syndecan-1) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Zheng et al., 2014 [ | China/USA | Anticancer effects of Baicalein on hepatocellular carcinoma cells | ?/ | Radix | Baicalein | Purchased | MIHAs, H22, BEL-7404, HepG2 cells | Mice/ICR | ♂ | ?/18–22 g | Intraperitoneal/ | Transplanted H22 | Weight of tumors/experiment end | Immunohistochemistry (AKT, p-AKT Ser473, |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Fan et al., 2014 [ | China | Luteoloside suppresses proliferation and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by Inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome | ?/ | ? | Luteoloside | Purchased | Hep3B, SNU-449, Huh-7, SMMC-7721, MHCCLM3, MHCC97-H cell | Mice/BALB/cA nude | ♂ | 6 weeks/? | Oral/daily for 4 weeks (subcutaneous) and 8 weeks (metastasis) groups | Transplanted SMMC-7721 | Volume of tumor (cm3)/every 3 to 4 days | H&E |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Feng et al., 2014 [ | China | Effect of grape procyanidins on tumor angiogenesis in liver cancer xenograft models | ? | Seed | Proanthocyanidins (GPC) | ? | ? | Mice/ SPF Kunming | ? | 4–6 weeks/20 g | Intraperitoneal/ | Transplanted H22 cells | ? | Immunohistochemistry (VEGF and CD34), RT-PCR (VEGF and |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Zhang et al., 2013 [ | China | Silybin-mediated inhibition of notch | ?/ | ? | Silybin (SIL) | ? | HepG2 cells | Mice/athymic nude | ♂ | 4–6 weeks/? | Intraperitoneal/5 times for week for 20 days | Transplanted HepG2 | Size of tumor/every 3 days | Western blot (Notch1, Hes1, RBP-J |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Yang et al., 2013 [ | China | Antitumor effects of two extracts from | ?/ | Whole plant | Flavonoids (FOF) 2′,4′-dihydroxychalcone | Ethanol extraction/? | SMMC-7721 cells | Mice/ICR | ♂ | 5-6 weeks/18–22 g | Intragastric/? | Transplanted H22 cells | Tumor growth inhibitory ratio/experiment end | ? |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Yu et al., 2013 [ | China | A study on the antitumor effect of total flavonoids from | ?/ | Whole plant | Total flavonoids | Ethanol extraction/? | ? | Mice/Kunming | 1/2 ♂ and 1/2 ♀ | ?/18–22 g | Intraperitoneal/ | Transplanted H22 cell | Tumor inhibition rate and organ index (spleen and thymus)/experiment end | ELISA (TNF- |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Xiang et al., 2013 [ | China | Chemical composition of total flavonoids from | ?/ | Whole plant | Total flavonoids | Alcoholic extraction 95%/HPLC and chromatography in silica gel column | HepG2, Huh-7 HCC cells | Mice/Kunming | ♂ | ?/18–22 g | Intraperitoneal/ | Transplanted H22 cells | Weight of tumor, organ index/experiment end | Automatic counting (red blood cells, hemoglobin, white blood cells, platelets), serum (AST, ALT, BUN, CK, uric acid), ELISA (caspase-3, caspase-8, caspase-9) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Hashimoto et al., 2014 [ | Japan | Methylated-(3′′)-epigallocatechin gallate analog suppresses tumor growth in Huh7 hepatoma cells via inhibition of angiogenesis | ?/ | Green leaves | Polyphenolic, catechin, methylated-(3)-epigallocatechin gallate (MethylEGCG) | Purchased/HPLC purification | HUVECs, Huh7 cells | Mice/BALB/cA nude | ♂ | 6 weeks/20 g | Intraperitoneal/ | Transplanted Huh7 cells | Size, volume of tumor/every week | Immunohistochemistry (CD31) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Saleem et al., 2013 [ | India and Saudi Arabia | Anticancer potential of rhamnocitrin 40-b-D-galactopyranoside against N-diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in rats | ?/ | Leaves | Flavonol glycoside (rhamnocitrin 40-b-D-galactopyranoside RGP) | MeOH/H2O extraction/column Sephadex LH-20 | ? | Rats/Wistar | ? | ?/150–220 g | Intraperitoneal/ | Single intraperitoneal dose of N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) (200 mg/kg b.w.) | ? | Serum (ALT, AST, ALP, total bilirubin, protein content, LPO), enzymatic determination (SOD, CAT, GPx, GST), H&E |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Monga et al., 2013 [ | India | Growth inhibition and apoptosis induction by (+)-Cyanidan-3-ol in hepatocellular carcinoma | Fabaceae/ | Heart wood | Cyanidan-3-ol (CD-3) | Ethanol extraction/HPLC | HepG2 cells | Mice/BALB/cA | ♂ | 6-7 weeks/26-27 g | Oral/daily for 20 weeks | Single intraperitoneal dose of NDEA (200 mg/kg b.w.) and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4, 3 ml/kg b.w.) thrice a week for six weeks | Relative liver weight/experiment end | Serum (AST, ALT, ALP, |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Zhao et al., 2013 [ | China | Enhanced 5-fluorouracil cytotoxicity in high COX-2 expressing hepatocellular carcinoma cells by Wogonin via the PI3K/AKT pathway | ?/ | ? | Wogonin 5,7-dihydroxy-8-methoxyflavone (WOG) | ? | HepG2, SMMC-7721 cells | Mice/BALB/cA nude | ♀ | 35–40 days/18–22 g | Intravenous/once every two days for 10 times | Transplanted SMMC-7721 cells | Tumor inhibitory ratio, weight, size, volume of tumor/experiment end | ? |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Wei et al., 2012 [ | China | Antitumor and antiangiogenic effects of | ?/ | Air dried roots | 2-(1,4-Dihydroxy-cyclohexyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-chromone-4′-O-glucoside; protoapigenin-4′-O-glucoside; 2-(1,2-dihydroxy-4-oxo-cyclohex-5-enyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-chromone; 5,7,2′,5′-tetrahydroxy-flavanone-2′-O-glucoside; protoapigenin; 2-(1,4-dihydroxy-cyclohexyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-chromone; 5,7,2′,5′-tetrahydroxy-flavanone-2′-O-6′′-O-acetylglucoside; 5,6-dihydro-6-methoxyprotoapigenone; quercetin-3-O-rutinose; protoapigenone; apigenin-4-O-glucoside; kaempferol-3-O-rutinose; kaempferol-3,7-di-O-rhamnoside; kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside; apigenin-4-O-rhamnoside | ?/HPLC-DAD/MS Amethyst C18-P column | HUVECs, H-22 cells | Mice/Kunming | ♂ | ?/18–22 g | Intraperitoneal/ | Transplanted H22 cells | Weight of tumor, tumor inhibitory ratio/experiment end | Serum (red blood cell, white blood cell, platelet and hemoglobin), BUN, CRE, AST and ALT, TSA, LASA, enzymatic determination (MDA, SOD, CAT, GPx, GR, GST, T-SH, GSH, PrPr-SHs), H&E, immunohistochemistry (CD34, VEGF) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Wu et al., 2011 [ | Taiwan | Suppression of hepatitis B virus × protein-mediated tumorigenic effects by ursolic acid | Rubiaceae/ | Leaves | Ursolic acid and silymarin | ? | Huh7, HepG2, Hep3B cells | Mice/nude | ? | 3 weeks/? | Intraperitoneal/?/8 weeks | Transplanted 6 2.2.15 cells | Diameters of tumor/experiment end | Serum (ALT, AST, BUN, CRE) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Wang et al., 2011 [ | Taiwan |
| ?/ | Whole plant | Total flavonoids | Water extract (SNWE)/? | HepG2 cells | Mice/Athymic nude | ? | ? | Intraperitoneal/?/35 days | Transplanted HepG2 cells | Volume of tumor/every week, final volume, wet weight of tumor/experiment end | ? |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Cai et al., 2011 [ | China | Apigenin inhibits hepatoma cell growth through alteration of gene expression patterns | ? | ? | Apigenin | ? | Huh7 cells | Mice/BALB/c nude | ♀ | 5 weeks/16–18 g | Intraperitoneal/?/30 days | Transplanted Huh7 cells | Number of tumors, diameters, wet weight of tumor/experiment end | H&E |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Huang et al., 2010 [ | China | Carbonyl reductase 1 as a novel target of (−)-epigallocatechin gallate against hepatocellular carcinoma | ?/ | ? | Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) | ? | Hep G2, Hep 3B, SMMC-7721 cells | Mice/? | ? | ? | Injected/?/15 days | Transplanted SMMC-7721 cells and Hep3B/?/? | Tumor growth, body weight/? | Serum (ALT, AST, LDH, CK-MBB, LDH, MDA, cTnT) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Liang et al., 2010 [ | China and USA | Green tea catechins augment the antitumor activity of doxorubicin in an | ?/ | ? | Catechin and epigallocatechin-3-gallate | ? | BEL-7404, BEL-7404/DOX cells | Mice/ BALB/cA nude | ♂ and ?? | 4-5 weeks/13–17 g | Intraperitoneal/?/33 days | Transplanted BEL-7404/DOX HCC cells | Dimensions of tumor, volume of tumor/every 2 days, tumor growth, body weight/experiment end | Fluorospectrophotometry (DOX), immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR (MDR1) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Zhou et al., 2010 [ | China | Inhibition of hepatoma 22 tumor by liquiritigenin | ?/ | ? | Liquiritigenin (LQ) | Purchased | ? | Mice/ICR | ♂ | ?/20–22 g | Intragastric/?/15 days | Transplanted H22 cells | Size, volume of tumor, body weight/every 3 days, Inhibition ratio of tumor growth, weight of tumor, organ index/experiment end | H&E, electron microscopy (tumor ultrastructure), enzymatic determination (MDA) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Yang et al., 2009 [ | China | Antiproliferative efficacy of icariin on HepG2 hepatoma and its possible mechanism of action | ?/ | ? | Icariin (5-hydroxy 4-methoxy 8-isopentenyl 3-O- | Purchased | HepG2 cells | Mice/NMRI nude | ♂ | ? | Oral/28 weeks | Transplanted HepG2 cells | Volume of tumor, tumor growth inhibition/twice per week | Immunohistochemistry (CD4, CD8, CD19) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Zhao et al., 2010 [ | China | Synergistic effect of 5-fluorouracil and the flavonoid Oroxylin A on HepG2 human hepatocellular carcinoma and on H22 transplanted mice | ?/ | ? | Oroxylin A | ? | HepG2 cells | Mice/Kunming | ♂ | ?/18–22 g | Oral/?/7 days | Transplanted H22 cells | Volume of tumor/experiment end | ? |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Cui et al., 2009 [ | USA | Effects and mechanisms of Silibinin on human hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts in nude mice | ?/ | ? | Silibinin | ? | HuH7 cells | Mice/nude | ? | ? | Oral/?/5 weeks | Transplanted HuH7 cells | Volumes of tumor/every week, weight of tumor/experiment end | Immunoprecipitation (AFP, PTEN, binding interaction between p21, p27 with CDK4, binding of DP1 with E2F1), Western blotting (Ki-67, p21, p27, E2F1, CDK4, p-Rb, caspase-3, caspase-9, PTEN, AC-H3, AC-H4, p-AKT, p-survivin and p-ERK, Plk1, Chk1, SOD1), ELISA (NF-kB) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Umarani et al., 2008 [ | India | Protective effect of | Anacardiaceae/ | Fruit | Flavonoids | Dried and powdered fruit/? | ? | Rats/? | ♂ | 8–10 weeks/120–150 g | Oral/?/28 days | Intraperitoneal dose of AFB1 (2 mg/kg b.w.) | ? | Serum (protein, LPO, lipid peroxides, G6PD, vitamin E, vitamin C, uric acid), enzymatic determination (SOD, CAT, GPx, GR) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Miura et al., 2007 [ | Japan | Effect of apple polyphenol extract on hepatoma proliferation and invasion in culture and on tumor growth, metastasis, abnormal lipoprotein profiles in hepatoma-bearing rats | ?/ | Unripe apples | Apple polyphenol extract (APE) | Purchased | AH109A cells | Rats/Donryu | ♂ | 5 weeks/? | Oral/?/21 days | Transplanted AH109A cells | Size of tumor/every day | Serum (T-Ch, HDL-Ch), LPO, fecal steroid, AI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Selvendiran et al., 2006 [ | Japan | Luteolin promotes degradation in signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in human hepatoma cells: an implication for the antitumor potential of flavonoids | ? | Seeds | Luteolin | ?/HPLC | HepG2, HLF, HAK-1B, IMR-32 cells | Mice/BALB/cA nude | ♂ | 5 weeks/? | Oral/?/6 weeks | Transplanted HAK-1B cells | Size, volume (mm3) of tumor/weekly | Immunoblotting (Tyr705-P-STAT3) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nishikawa et al., 2006 [ | Japan | A green tea polyphenol, epigallocatechin-3-gallate, induces apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma, possibly through inhibition of Bcl-2 family proteins | ?/ | ? | Epigallocatechin-3-gallate | ? | HLE, HepG2, HuH-7, PLC/PRF/5 cells | Mice/BALB/cA nude | ♂ | 28 weeks/? | Oral/?/25 days | Transplanted HLE cells | Volume of tumor/daily | TUNEL, immunohistochemistry (Bcl-2a, Bcl-xl) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Premalatha and Sachdanandam, 1999 [ | India |
| ?/ | Nuts | Total flavonoids | Purchased | ? | Rat/Wistar | ♂ | ?/100 g | Oral/?/14 days | Single intraperitoneal dose of AFB1 (2 mg/kg b.w.) | Weight of liver and kidney/experiment end | Total protein, enzymatic determination (GSH, uric acid, vitamin E, vitamin C, CYP, T-SH, NPSH) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nishida et al., 1994 [ | Japan | Inhibitory effects of (−)-epigallocatechin gallate on spontaneous hepatoma in C3H/HeNCrj mice and human hepatoma-derived PLC/PRF/5 cells | ?/ | ? | Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) | ? | PLC/PRF5 cells | Mice/C3H/HenCrj | ♂ | 8 weeks/? | Oral/?/65 weeks | Spontaneous hepatocarcinogenesis | # of tumor, diameter of liver/experiment end | H&E, albumin, bilirubin, GPT, |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Zhang et al., 2002 [ | Japan | Effects of dietary powdered green tea and theanine on tumor growth and endogenous hyperlipidemia in hepatoma-bearing rats | ?/ | ? | ? | ? | ? | Rat/Donryu | ♂ | 4 weeks/? | Oral/?/14 days | Transplanted AH109A cells | Size, volume, diameter of tumor, radius tumor/every day, weight of tumor/experiment end | Precipitation method (HDL, LDL, VLDL), enzymatic determination (T-Ch and HDL-ChM, TBARS), fecal extraction (neutral sterol, bile acid) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Klaunig, 1992 [ | USA | Chemopreventive effects of green tea components on hepatic carcinogenesis | ?/ | ? | Epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, epigallocatechin, epigallocatechin gallate | Methanol extraction/steel column with silicic acid | Primary cells mouse hepatocytes | Rat/B6C3F1 | ♂ | ? | Oral/?/28 weeks | Single intraperitoneal dose NDEA (90 mg/kg b.w.) | ? | H&E |
?: not specified; ♀: female; ♂: male; b.w.: body weight; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin histological staining; qRT-PCR: real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; TUNEL: terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling; AC-H3: acetilated histone H3; AC-H4: acetilated histone H4; AKT: protein kinase B; P-AKTSer473: phosphorylated AKT serine 473; Bcl-2: B-cell lymphoma 2; BAX: Bcl-2 associated X protein; CD4: cluster of cuadruple differentiation; CD8: cluster of differentiation 8; CD19: cluster of differentiation 19; CD31: cluster of differentiation 31; CD34: hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34; CDK4: cyclin-dependent kinase 4; P21: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1; P27: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (CDKN1B); P-ERK: phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinases; Plk1: polo-like kinase 1; Chk1: checkpoint kinase 1; cTnT: cardiac troponin T; CYP: cytochrome P450; DOX: doxorubicin; DP1: transcriptional factor DP1; E2F1: transcriptional factor E2F1; Hes1: transcription factor HES1; FGF-2: fibroblast growth factor; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; IL-2: interleukin 2; Ki-67: Ki-67 antigen; MDR1: multidrug resistance protein 1; MMP9: matrix metallopeptidase 9; NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; Notch 1: Notch homolog 1; P53: P53 protein; P65: nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p65 subunit; P-Rb: retinoblastoma protein; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homolog; RBP-jk: recombining binding protein suppressor of hairless; STAT3: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Tyr 705-P-STAT3: phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; CAT: catalase; LPO: lipid peroxidation; MDA: malondialdehyde; SOD: superoxide anion; SOD1: superoxide dismutase 1; T-AOC: total antioxidant capacity; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; AI: atherogenic index; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; CK-MB: creatinine kinase-MB; CK: creatinine kinase; G6PD: glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; GPT: glutamic-pyruvic transaminase; γ-GT: gamma-glutamyl transferase; GR: glutathione reductase; GSH: reduced glutathione; GST: glutathione transferase; HDL-Ch: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HSPGs: heparan sulfate proteoglycans; LASA: lipid associated sialic acid; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; MPO: hepatic myeloperoxidase; PrPr-SHs: protein thiols; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; T-Ch: triglyceride; TSA: total sialic acid; T-SH: total thiol; NPSH: nonprotein thiol.
Figure 1Flow diagram of the systematic review literature search results. Based on “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” http://www.prisma-statement.org. From: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(6): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097. For more information, visit http://www.prisma-statement.org/.
Figure 2Schematic representation of plant species, used flavonoids, and countries with researches about benefits of flavonoids in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 3Main results demonstrating the action of flavonoids in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in murine models.
Figure 4Number of papers published by worldwide scientists using flavonoids in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in the last 25 years (between 1990 and 2015).
ARRIVE of the studies using flavonoids for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in murine models.
| Reference | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | ||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accurate and concise a description of the content of the article | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 100% |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary of the background, objectives, methods, principal findings, and conclusions | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 100% |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Background | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 100% |
| Objectives | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 100% |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indicate the nature of the ethical review permissions, relevant licenses | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 64.71% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of experimental and control groups | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 82.35% | ||||||
| Any steps taken to minimize the effects of subjective bias when allocating animals to treatment | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 58.82% | ||||||||||||||
| The experimental unit | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 52.94% | ||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Doses | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 100% |
| Method of administration | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 64.71% | ||||||||||||
| Time of day | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 55.88% | |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Origin of animal | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 85.29% | |||||
| Species | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 100% |
| Sex | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 64.71% | ||||||||||||
| Developmental stage | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 50% | |||||||||||||||||
| Weight | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 52.94% | ||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Housing | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 41.17% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Husbandry conditions | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 50% | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Specify the total number of animals used in each experiment | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 61.76% | |||||||||||||
| Explain how the number of animals was decided | 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| How animals were allocated to experimental group (AZAR) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 55.88% | |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clearly define the primary and secondary experimental outcomes assessed | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 47.05% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provide details of the statistical methods used for each analysis | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 70.58% | ||||||||||
| Specify the unit of analysis for each dataset | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 70.58% | ||||||||||
| Describe any methods used to assess whether the data met the assumptions of the statistical approach | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 35.29% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For each experimental group, report relevant characteristics and health status of animals before treatment or testing | X | X | X | X | X | 14.70% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Report the number of animals in each group included in each analysis | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 44.11% | |||||||||||||||||||
| If any animals or data were not included in the analysis, explain why | 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Report the results for each analysis carried out | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 100% |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Give details of all important adverse events in each experimental group | X | 2.94% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Describe any modifications to the experimental protocols made to reduce adverse events | X | 2.94% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interpret the results, taking into account the study objectives and hypotheses, current theory, and other relevant studies in the literature | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 100% |
| Comment on the study limitations including any potential sources of bias | X | 2.94% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comment on whether and how the findings of this study are likely to translate to other species or systems, including any relevance to human biology | X | X | X | X | X | X | 17.64% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| List all funding sources | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 73.52% | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| % | 80% | 68.57% | 68.57% | 62.85% | 62.85% | 65.71% | 68.57% | 71.42% | 68.57% | 71.42% | 57.14% | 68.57% | 68.57% | 65.71% | 80.00% | 65.71% | 80.00% | 62.85% | 62.85% | 65.71% | 40.00% | 45.71% | 68.57% | 65.71% | 48.57% | 28.57% | 71.42% | 68.57% | 34.28% | 25.71% | 28.57% | 28.57% | 25.71% | 25.71% | |