Literature DB >> 29681757

Constraints on primary and secondary particulate carbon sources using chemical tracer and 14C methods during CalNex-Bakersfield.

Rebecca J Sheesley1, Punith Dev Nallathamby1, Jason D Surratt2, Anita Lee3, Michael Lewandowski4, John H Offenberg4, Mohammed Jaoui4, Tadeusz E Kleindienst4.   

Abstract

The present study investigates primary and secondary sources of organic carbon for Bakersfield, CA, USA as part of the 2010 CalNex study. The method used here involves integrated sampling that is designed to allow for detailed and specific chemical analysis of particulate matter (PM) in the Bakersfield airshed. To achieve this objective, filter samples were taken during thirty-four 23-hr periods between 19 May and 26 June 2010 and analyzed for organic tracers by gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Contributions to organic carbon (OC) were determined by two organic tracer-based techniques: primary OC by chemical mass balance and secondary OC by a mass fraction method. Radiocarbon (14C) measurements of the total organic carbon were also made to determine the split between the modern and fossil carbon and thereby constrain unknown sources of OC not accounted for by either tracer-based attribution technique. From the analysis, OC contributions from four primary sources and four secondary sources were determined, which comprised three sources of modern carbon and five sources of fossil carbon. The major primary sources of OC were from vegetative detritus (9.8%), diesel (2.3%), gasoline (<1.0%), and lubricating oil impacted motor vehicle exhaust (30%); measured secondary sources resulted from isoprene (1.5%), α-pinene (<1.0%), toluene (<1.0%), and naphthalene (<1.0%, as an upper limit) contributions. The average observed organic carbon (OC) was 6.42 ± 2.33 μgC m-3. The 14C derived apportionment indicated that modern and fossil components were nearly equivalent on average; however, the fossil contribution ranged from 32-66% over the five week campaign. With the fossil primary and secondary sources aggregated, only 25% of the fossil organic carbon could not be attributed. Whereas, nearly 80% of the modern carbon could not be attributed to primary and secondary sources accessible to this analysis, which included tracers of biomass burning, vegetative detritus and secondary biogenic carbon. The results of the current study contributes source-based evaluation of the carbonaceous aerosol at CalNex Bakersfield.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CalNex; chemical mass balance; primary organic aerosol; radiocarbon; secondary organic aerosol

Year:  2017        PMID: 29681757      PMCID: PMC5906818          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  28 in total

1.  Source apportionment of PM2.5 in the Southeastern United States using solvent-extractable organic compounds as tracers.

Authors:  Mei Zheng; Glen R Cass; James J Schauer; Eric S Edgerton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Validation of the chemical mass balance receptor model applied to hydrocarbon source apportionment in the southern california air quality study.

Authors:  E M Fujita; J G Watson; J C Chow; Z Lu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Douglas W Dockery
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Source apportionment of daily fine particulate matter at Jefferson Street, Atlanta, GA, during summer and winter.

Authors:  Mei Zheng; Glen R Cass; Lin Ke; Fu Wang; James J Schauer; Eric S Edgerton; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Primary and secondary contributions to ambient PM in the midwestern United States.

Authors:  Michael Lewandowski; Mohammed Jaoui; John H Offenberg; Tadeusz E Kleindienst; Edward O Edney; Rebecca J Sheesley; James J Schauer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere.

Authors:  J L Jimenez; M R Canagaratna; N M Donahue; A S H Prevot; Q Zhang; J H Kroll; P F DeCarlo; J D Allan; H Coe; N L Ng; A C Aiken; K S Docherty; I M Ulbrich; A P Grieshop; A L Robinson; J Duplissy; J D Smith; K R Wilson; V A Lanz; C Hueglin; Y L Sun; J Tian; A Laaksonen; T Raatikainen; J Rautiainen; P Vaattovaara; M Ehn; M Kulmala; J M Tomlinson; D R Collins; M J Cubison; E J Dunlea; J A Huffman; T B Onasch; M R Alfarra; P I Williams; K Bower; Y Kondo; J Schneider; F Drewnick; S Borrmann; S Weimer; K Demerjian; D Salcedo; L Cottrell; R Griffin; A Takami; T Miyoshi; S Hatakeyama; A Shimono; J Y Sun; Y M Zhang; K Dzepina; J R Kimmel; D Sueper; J T Jayne; S C Herndon; A M Trimborn; L R Williams; E C Wood; A M Middlebrook; C E Kolb; U Baltensperger; D R Worsnop
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A comparison of summertime secondary organic aerosol source contributions at contrasting urban locations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stone; Jiabin Zhou; David C Snyder; Andrew P Rutter; Mark Mieritz; James J Schauer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Volatility of organic molecular markers used for source apportionment analysis: measurements and implications for atmospheric lifetime.

Authors:  Andrew A May; Rawad Saleh; Christopher J Hennigan; Neil M Donahue; Allen L Robinson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Contribution of primary and secondary sources to organic aerosol and PM2.5 at SEARCH network sites.

Authors:  Tadeusz E Kleindienst; Michael Lewandowski; John H Offenberg; Edward O Edney; Mohammed Jaoui; Mei Zheng; Xiang Ding; Eric S Edgerton
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.235

10.  Identification and quantification of aerosol polar oxygenated compounds bearing carboxylic or hydroxyl groups. 1. Method development.

Authors:  M Jaoui; T E Kleindienst; M Lewandowski; E O Edney
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.