Literature DB >> 19544838

A comparison of summertime secondary organic aerosol source contributions at contrasting urban locations.

Elizabeth A Stone1, Jiabin Zhou, David C Snyder, Andrew P Rutter, Mark Mieritz, James J Schauer.   

Abstract

Primary and secondary sources contributing to atmospheric organic aerosol during the months of July and August were quantitatively assessed in three North American urban areas: Cleveland, Ohio, and Detroit, Michigan, in the Midwest region and Riverside, California, in the Los Angeles Air Basin. Organic molecular marker species unique to primary aerosol sources and secondarytracers derived from isoprene, alpha-pinene, beta-caryophyllene, and toluene were measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Source contributions from motor vehicles, biomass burning, vegetative detritus, and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) were estimated using chemical mass balance (CMB) modeling. In Cleveland, primary sources accounted for 37 +/- 2% of ambient organic carbon, measured biogenic and anthropogenic secondary sources contributed 46 +/- 6%, and other unknown sources contributed 17 +/- 4%. Similarly, Detroit aerosol was determined to be 44 +/- 5% primary and 37 +/- 3% secondary, while 19 +/- 7% was unaccounted for by measured sources. In Riverside, 21 +/- 3% of organic carbon came from primary sources, 26 +/- 5% was attributed to measured secondary sources, and 53 +/- 3% came from other sources that were expected to be secondary in nature. The comparison of samples across these two regions demonstrated that summertime SOA in the Midwestern United States was substantially different from the summertime SOA in the Los Angeles Air Basin and indicated the need to exert caution when generalizing about the sources and nature of SOA across different urban areas. Furthermore, the results of this study suggestthatthe contemporary understanding of SOA sources and formation mechanisms is satisfactory to explainthe majority of SOA in the Midwest Additional SOA sources and mechanisms of formation are needed to explain the majority of SOA in the Los Angeles Air Basin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19544838     DOI: 10.1021/es8025209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

1.  Constraints on primary and secondary particulate carbon sources using chemical tracer and 14C methods during CalNex-Bakersfield.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sheesley; Punith Dev Nallathamby; Jason D Surratt; Anita Lee; Michael Lewandowski; John H Offenberg; Mohammed Jaoui; Tadeusz E Kleindienst
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  On the origin of water-soluble organic tracer compounds in fine aerosols in two cities: the case of Los Angeles and Barcelona.

Authors:  M Alier; M Dall Osto; Y-H Lin; J D Surratt; R Tauler; J O Grimalt; B L van Drooge
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Public health impacts of secondary particulate formation from aromatic hydrocarbons in gasoline.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg; Jonathan Buonocore; Prakash V Bhave; Joel A Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.