Literature DB >> 29679201

Utilization of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in a Diverse Breast Cancer Patient Population: Development of a Clinicopathologic Model to Predict High-Risk Scores and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Ko Un Park1, Yalei Chen2, Dhananjay Chitale3, Sarah Choi4, Haythem Ali5, S David Nathanson6, Jessica Bensenhaver6, Erica Proctor6, Lindsay Petersen6, Randa Loutfi5, Alyson Simonds6, Marcia Kuklinski6, Thomas Doyle5, Vrushali Dabak5, Kim Cole3, Melissa Davis2, Lisa Newman7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The 21-gene expression profile [Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS)] stratifies benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2/neu-negative, node-negative breast cancer. It is not routinely applied to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) response; data in diverse patient populations also are limited. We developed a statistical model based on standard clinicopathologic features to identify high-risk cases (RS > 30) and then evaluated ability of predicted high RS to predict for NACT downstaging.
METHODS: Primary surgery patients with Oncotype DX RS testing 2012-2016 were identified from a prospectively-maintained database. A RS predictive model was created and applied to a dataset of comparable NACT patients. Response was defined as tumor size decrease ≥ 1 cm.
RESULTS: Of 394 primary surgery patients-60.4% white American; 31.0% African American-RS distribution was similar for both groups. No single feature reliably identified high RS patients; however, a model accounting for age, HR expression, proliferative index (MIB1/Ki67), histology, and tumor size was generated, with receiver operator area under the curve 0.909. Fifty-six NACT patients were identified (25 African American). Of 21 cases with all relevant clinicopathology, 14 responded to NACT and the model generated high-risk RS in 14 (100%); conversely, of 16 cases generating high-risk RS, only 2 did not respond.
CONCLUSIONS: Predictive modelling can identify high RS patients; this model also can identify patients likely to experience primary tumor downstaging with NACT. Until this model is validated in other datasets, we recommend that Oncotype-eligible patients undergo primary surgery with decisions regarding chemotherapy made in the adjuvant setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29679201     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6440-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

1.  HIF-1α, TWIST-1 and ITGB-1, associated with Tumor Stiffness, as Novel Predictive Markers for the Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Shuo Zhang; Song Gao; Yan Ma; Xueying Tan; Ye Kang; Weidong Ren
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  A Practical Predictive Model Based on Ultrasound Imaging and Clinical Indices for Estimation of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Pingping Ye; Hongbo Duan; Zhenya Zhao; Shibo Fang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Development and Validation of a New Multiparametric Random Survival Forest Predictive Model for Breast Cancer Recurrence with a Potential Benefit to Individual Outcomes.

Authors:  Huan Li; Ren-Bin Liu; Chen-Meng Long; Yuan Teng; Lin Cheng; Yu Liu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 4.  Breast Cancer Patients: Who Would Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapies?

Authors:  Liqin Yao; Gang Jia; Lingeng Lu; Wenxue Ma
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Review of the Evidence and Conditions That Facilitated Its Use during the Global Pandemic.

Authors:  Tabitha Tse; Sandeep Sehdev; Jean Seely; Denis H Gravel; Mark Clemons; Erin Cordeiro; Angel Arnaout
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Mechanisms of breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  S David Nathanson; Michael Detmar; Timothy P Padera; Lucy R Yates; Danny R Welch; Thomas C Beadnell; Adam D Scheid; Emma D Wrenn; Kevin Cheung
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.150

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.