Literature DB >> 29679149

Totally endoscopic implant to effect a gastric bypass: 12-month safety and efficacy outcomes.

Bryan J Sandler1, Laurent Biertho2, Mehran Anvari3, Roberto Rumbaut4, Luis Alonso Morales-Garza5, Gustavo Torres-Barrera4, Simon Marceau2, Dennis Hong3, C Daniel Smith6, Santiago Horgan7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only a small percentage of candidates for bariatric surgery ever undergo a procedure for weight loss. Devices duplicating key effects of bariatric surgeries with removable, fully trans-oral implants could extend their benefits to patients unwilling to undergo anatomy-altering abdominal surgeries.
METHODS: Thirty-two obese subjects (mean BMI: 42.3) were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, feasibility trial of the first fully trans-oral endoscopic gastrointestinal bypass device. The device is a cuff attached to the distal esophagus by transmural anchors and connected to a 120-cm sleeve diverting undigested nutrients to the jejunum. Bodyweight, vital signs, adverse events, medications, HbA1c, fasting glucose, and lipids were collected at baseline and follow-up visits. Device status was endoscopically assessed every 6 months.
RESULTS: The fully trans-oral procedure was successful in all subjects without intraoperative adverse events or postoperative infections. Twenty-eight of 32 subjects (88%) remained implanted with continuing follow-up beyond their 12-month visit. At 12 months, the 32 subjects had lost an average of 44.8% of excess body weight, 17.6% of total body weight, 20.8 kg, and 7.5 BMI points. Weight loss depended on capture of ingesta by the esophageal cuff, with 18 of 32 subjects without visible gaps around their cuffs at the 6 month endoscopy having significantly greater EWL (53.6 vs. 33.4% in the remaining subjects, p < 0.002). Mean HbA1c and fasting glucose declined by 1.1% points and 29 mg/dL in type 2 diabetic subjects, 80% of whom had remission of their diabetes at 12 months.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a fully trans-oral gastrointestinal bypass implant. This purely endoscopic device may provide a valuable addition to the armamentarium of treatment available for the management of morbid obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  And endoscopic surgery; Bariatric surgery; Endoluminal bariatric surgery; Gastric bypass; Obesity; Surgical endoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29679149     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6186-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  Trends in utilization of bariatric surgery, 2009-2012.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Stephen Vu; Eric Kim; Natalia Bodunova; Michael J Phelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  One-year human experience with a novel endoluminal, endoscopic gastric bypass sleeve for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Bryan J Sandler; Roberto Rumbaut; C Paul Swain; Gustavo Torres; Luis Morales; Lizcelly Gonzales; Sarah Schultz; Mark A Talamini; Garth R Jacobsen; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Human experience with an endoluminal, endoscopic, gastrojejunal bypass sleeve.

Authors:  Bryan J Sandler; Roberto Rumbaut; C Paul Swain; Gustavo Torres; Luis Morales; Lizcelly Gonzales; Sarah Schultz; Mark Talamini; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes--3-year outcomes.

Authors:  Philip R Schauer; Deepak L Bhatt; John P Kirwan; Kathy Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Ali Aminian; Claire E Pothier; Esther S H Kim; Steven E Nissen; Sangeeta R Kashyap
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample.

Authors:  Ronette L Kolotkin; Ross D Crosby
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Paul E O'Brien; John B Dixon; Cheryl Laurie; Stewart Skinner; Joe Proietto; John McNeil; Boyd Strauss; Sharon Marks; Linda Schachter; Leon Chapman; Margaret Anderson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The influence of an individual's weight perception on the acceptance of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Fatima Cody Stanford; Theodore K Kyle; Mechelle D Claridy; Joseph F Nadglowski; Caroline M Apovian
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Attitudes about the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery among patients with type 2 diabetes and a body mass index of 30-40 kg/m2.

Authors:  David B Sarwer; Scott Ritter; Thomas A Wadden; Jacqueline C Spitzer; Marion L Vetter; Reneé H Moore
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.734

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.