Literature DB >> 25546377

The influence of an individual's weight perception on the acceptance of bariatric surgery.

Fatima Cody Stanford1, Theodore K Kyle, Mechelle D Claridy, Joseph F Nadglowski, Caroline M Apovian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the proportion of US adults with excess weight and obesity who consider bariatric surgery to be appropriate for themselves and how their own weight perception influences this consideration.
METHODS: A stratified sample of 920 US adults in June 2014 was obtained through an online survey. The respondents were queried about bariatric surgery acceptability and personal weight perception. Average body mass index (BMI) was determined for each demographic variable, and responses were characterized according to BMI and concordance with perceived weight status. Chi-square analyses served to assess perceived weight concordance in relation to bariatric acceptance.
RESULTS: Only 32% of respondents with Class III obesity indicated that bariatric surgery would be an acceptable option for them, most often because they considered it to be too risky. Respondents with Class III obesity and concordant perception of weight status were more likely (P < 0.03) than discordant Class III respondents to accept bariatric surgery. Likewise, concordant respondents with excess weight, but not obesity, were more likely (P < 0.001) to correctly consider bariatric surgery to be inappropriate for them.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite good safety and efficacy, many persons still believe bariatric surgery is too risky. Weight perception concordance or discordance influences one's decision to consider this treatment option.
© 2014 The Obesity Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25546377      PMCID: PMC6339569          DOI: 10.1002/oby.20968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  7 in total

1.  General Practitioners and Bariatric Surgery in France: Are They Ready to Face the Challenge?

Authors:  Francesco Martini; Andrea Lazzati; Sylvie Fritsch; Arnaud Liagre; Antonio Iannelli; Luca Paolino
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Knowledge and Perception of Bariatric Surgery Among Primary Care Physicians: a Survey of Family Doctors in Ontario.

Authors:  Mark Auspitz; Michelle C Cleghorn; Arash Azin; Sanjeev Sockalingam; Fayez A Quereshy; Allan Okrainec; Timothy D Jackson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Totally endoscopic implant to effect a gastric bypass: 12-month safety and efficacy outcomes.

Authors:  Bryan J Sandler; Laurent Biertho; Mehran Anvari; Roberto Rumbaut; Luis Alonso Morales-Garza; Gustavo Torres-Barrera; Simon Marceau; Dennis Hong; C Daniel Smith; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Elipse™, a Procedureless Gastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study.

Authors:  Evzen Machytka; Ram Chuttani; Martina Bojkova; Tomas Kupka; Marek Buzga; Kathryn Stecco; Samuel Levy; Shantanu Gaur
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Factors Leading to Self-Removal from the Bariatric Surgery Program After Attending the Orientation Session.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Binghao Zhang; Patti Kastanias; Wei Wang; Allan Okraniec; Sanjeev Sockalingam
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Is Endoscopy Really Necessary for Placing Intragastric Balloons?

Authors:  Elisabeth M H Mathus-Vliegen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Factors Influence the Acceptance of Surgical Treatment in Chinese Bariatric Surgery Candidates.

Authors:  Shutong Tang; Shuqing Yu; Cunchuan Wang; Jingge Yang; Lilian Gao; Xiaomei Chen; Lina Wu; Bingsheng Guan; Jinfen Han; Weiju Chen; Wah Yang
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.129

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.