Literature DB >> 29678738

Autochthonous lactic acid bacteria isolated from pig faeces in Thailand show probiotic properties and antibacterial activity against enteric pathogenic bacteria.

Wandee Sirichokchatchawan1, Puwiya Pupa2, Prasert Praechansri2, Nutthee Am-In2, Somboon Tanasupawat3, Piengchan Sonthayanon4, Nuvee Prapasarakul5.   

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) play an important role in pig health and performance that arises from their beneficial impacts on the balance of gastrointestinal microbes, ability to fight enteric pathogens, and capacity to support the immune system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and safety aspects of five previously isolated autochthonous LAB strains, (Lactobacillus plantarum 22F, 25F and 31F, Pediococcus acidilactici 72N and Pediococcus pentosaceus 77F) from pig faeces as potential probiotics for a pig feed supplement. The functional and safety properties of the strains were assessed by in vitro tests. The functional properties tested were their abilities in tolerating low pH values under simulated gastric conditions, their cell surface properties (hydrophobicity, auto- and co-aggregation), antibacterial activity against the common enteric pathogenic bacteria in pigs (such as pathogenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella Choleraesuis and Streptococcus suis), and diacetyl production. The safety of the strains was analyzed based on the absent of haemolysis on blood and bile salt hydrolase activity. Although all strains demonstrated diacetyl production, good survivability and antibacterial activities, L. plantarum 22F and 25F showed the best performance with the strongest antibacterial actions against the indicator pathogens. Of the strains, only P. pentosaceus 77F exhibited haemolysis or bile salt hydrolase activity. Furthermore, a principal component analysis revealed that L. plantarum 22F possessed superior functional and safety aspects compared to the other four autochthonous strains and to reference strains L. plantarum JCM 1149 and P. acidilactici DSM 20284. Further in vivo studies using oral administration of the strains are justified to assess their effectiveness as feed supplements for pigs.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enteric pathogens; In vitro evaluation; Lactic acid bacteria; Pigs; Probiotic properties

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29678738     DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.04.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Pathog        ISSN: 0882-4010            Impact factor:   3.738


  16 in total

1.  Probiotic Potential and Wide-spectrum Antimicrobial Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Infant Feces.

Authors:  Xing Wang; Weidong Wang; Haoxin Lv; Hua Zhang; Yuan Liu; Miao Zhang; Yanping Wang; Zhongfang Tan
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Identification, Biochemical Characterization, and Safety Attributes of Locally Isolated Lactobacillus fermentum from Bubalus bubalis (buffalo) Milk as a Probiotic.

Authors:  Sana Abid; Arshad Farid; Rameesha Abid; Mujeeb Ur Rehman; Walaa F Alsanie; Majid Alhomrani; Abdulhakeem S Alamri; Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq; Daniel Ingo Hefft; Saddam Saqib; Muhammad Muzammal; Sabrin Abdelrahman Morshedy; Mashael W Alruways; Shakira Ghazanfar
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-30

3.  Selection of Potential Probiotic Bacteria from Exclusively Breastfed Infant Faeces with Antagonistic Activity Against Multidrug-Resistant ESKAPE Pathogens.

Authors:  Sonakshi Rastogi; Vineeta Mittal; Aditi Singh
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs.

Authors:  Pawiya Pupa; Prasert Apiwatsiri; Wandee Sirichokchatchawan; Nopadon Pirarat; Tanawong Maison; Anantawat Koontanatechanon; Nuvee Prapasarakul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Probiotic Properties of New Lactobacillus Strains Intended to Be Used as Feed Additives for Monogastric Animals.

Authors:  Katarzyna Śliżewska; Agnieszka Chlebicz-Wójcik; Adriana Nowak
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  The efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria.

Authors:  Pawiya Pupa; Prasert Apiwatsiri; Wandee Sirichokchatchawan; Nopadon Pirarat; Nongnuj Muangsin; Asad Ali Shah; Nuvee Prapasarakul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains of Potential Use as Feed Additives - The Basic Safety and Usefulness Criterion.

Authors:  Ilona Stefańska; Ewelina Kwiecień; Katarzyna Jóźwiak-Piasecka; Monika Garbowska; Marian Binek; Magdalena Rzewuska
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-01

8.  Anticonjugation and Antibiofilm Evaluation of Probiotic Strains Lactobacillus plantarum 22F, 25F, and Pediococcus acidilactici 72N Against Escherichia coli Harboring mcr-1 Gene.

Authors:  Prasert Apiwatsiri; Pawiya Pupa; Jitrapa Yindee; Waree Niyomtham; Wandee Sirichokchatchawan; Kittitat Lugsomya; Asad Ali Shah; Nuvee Prapasarakul
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-11

9.  In vitro assessment of antibacterial activity from Lactobacillus spp. strains against virulent Salmonella species isolated from slaughter animals in Benin.

Authors:  Alidehou Jerrold Agbankpe; Tamegnon Victorien Dougnon; Roubaya Balarabe; Esther Deguenon; Lamine Baba-Moussa
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-12-13

10.  Screening of Lactobacillus plantarum Subsp. plantarum with Potential Probiotic Activities for Inhibiting ETEC K88 in Weaned Piglets.

Authors:  Weiwei Wang; Hao Ma; Haojie Yu; Guangyong Qin; Zhongfang Tan; Yanping Wang; Huili Pang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.