Literature DB >> 29677521

Investigating the interplay between substrate stiffness and ligand chemistry in directing mesenchymal stem cell differentiation within 3D macro-porous substrates.

Matthew G Haugh1, Ted J Vaughan2, Christopher M Madl3, Rosanne M Raftery4, Laoise M McNamara2, Fergal J O'Brien4, Sarah C Heilshorn5.   

Abstract

Dimensionality can have a profound impact on stiffness-mediated differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). However, while we have begun to understand cellular response when encapsulated within 3D substrates, the behavior of cells within macro-porous substrates is relatively underexplored. The goal of this study was to determine the influence of macro-porous topographies on stiffness-mediated differentiation of MSCs. We developed macro-porous recombinant elastin-like protein (ELP) substrates that allow independent control of mechanical properties and ligand chemistry. We then used computational modeling to probe the impact of pore topography on the mechanical stimulus that cells are exposed to within these substrates, and finally we investigated stiffness induced biases towards adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs within macro-porous substrates. Computational modeling revealed that there is significant heterogeneity in the mechanical stimuli that cells are exposed to within porous substrates and that this heterogeneity is predominantly due to the wide range of possible cellular orientations within the pores. Surprisingly, MSCs grown within 3D porous substrates respond to increasing substrate stiffness by up-regulating both osteogenesis and adipogenesis. These results demonstrate that within porous substrates the behavior of MSCs diverges from previously observed responses to substrate stiffness, emphasizing the importance of topography as a determinant of cellular behavior.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-matrix interactions; Differentiation; Macro-porosity; Mechanotransduction; Mesenchymal stem cells; Substrate stiffness; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29677521      PMCID: PMC5997298          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  66 in total

1.  Comparative cell response to artificial extracellular matrix proteins containing the RGD and CS5 cell-binding domains.

Authors:  Julie C Liu; Sarah C Heilshorn; David A Tirrell
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.988

2.  Modulus-driven differentiation of marrow stromal cells in 3D scaffolds that is independent of myosin-based cytoskeletal tension.

Authors:  Sapun H Parekh; Kaushik Chatterjee; Sheng Lin-Gibson; Nicole M Moore; Marcus T Cicerone; Marian F Young; Carl G Simon
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation.

Authors:  Andrew S Rowlands; Peter A George; Justin J Cooper-White
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 4.249

4.  Bio-Orthogonally Crosslinked, Engineered Protein Hydrogels with Tunable Mechanics and Biochemistry for Cell Encapsulation.

Authors:  Christopher M Madl; Lily M Katz; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 5.  Integration of actin dynamics and cell adhesion by a three-dimensional, mechanosensitive molecular clutch.

Authors:  Lindsay B Case; Clare M Waterman
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Nathaniel Huebsch; Praveen R Arany; Angelo S Mao; Dmitry Shvartsman; Omar A Ali; Sidi A Bencherif; José Rivera-Feliciano; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl) phosphonium chloride as a covalent cross-linking agent for cell encapsulation within protein-based hydrogels.

Authors:  Cindy Chung; Kyle J Lampe; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics.

Authors:  Carsten Grashoff; Brenton D Hoffman; Michael D Brenner; Ruobo Zhou; Maddy Parsons; Michael T Yang; Mark A McLean; Stephen G Sligar; Christopher S Chen; Taekjip Ha; Martin A Schwartz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  A I Caplan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  N-cadherin adhesive interactions modulate matrix mechanosensing and fate commitment of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Brian D Cosgrove; Keeley L Mui; Tristan P Driscoll; Steven R Caliari; Kush D Mehta; Richard K Assoian; Jason A Burdick; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  14 in total

1.  Tethering transforming growth factor β1 to soft hydrogels guides vascular smooth muscle commitment from human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Yonghui Ding; Richard Johnson; Sadhana Sharma; Xiaoyun Ding; Stephanie J Bryant; Wei Tan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  The application of three-dimensional cell culture in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Qiao Chen; Youbin Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 3.  The Intersection of Mechanotransduction and Regenerative Osteogenic Materials.

Authors:  Anthony A Bertrand; Sri Harshini Malapati; Dean T Yamaguchi; Justine C Lee
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Decellularized Human Umbilical Tissue-Derived Hydrogels Promote Proliferation and Chondrogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Faiza Ramzan; Sobia Ekram; Trivia Frazier; Asmat Salim; Omair Anwar Mohiuddin; Irfan Khan
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

5.  Gaseous sulfur trioxide induced controllable sulfonation promoting biomineralization and osseointegration of polyetheretherketone implants.

Authors:  Teng Wan; Zixue Jiao; Min Guo; Zongliang Wang; Yizao Wan; Kaili Lin; Qinyi Liu; Peibiao Zhang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-07-04

Review 6.  Micro-Engineered Models of Development Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Pallavi Srivastava; Kristopher A Kilian
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 7.  Protein Hydrogels: The Swiss Army Knife for Enhanced Mechanical and Bioactive Properties of Biomaterials.

Authors:  Carla Huerta-López; Jorge Alegre-Cebollada
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 8.  Alginate Microencapsulation for Three-Dimensional In Vitro Cell Culture.

Authors:  Sung-Min Kang; Ji-Hoon Lee; Yun Suk Huh; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-06-25

9.  Supramolecular Modification of a Sequence-Controlled Collagen-Mimicking Polymer.

Authors:  Sergio Spaans; Peter-Paul K H Fransen; Maaike J G Schotman; Ruben van der Wulp; René P M Lafleur; Sebastiaan G J M Kluijtmans; Patricia Y W Dankers
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 6.988

10.  Cryoprotectant enables structural control of porous scaffolds for exploration of cellular mechano-responsiveness in 3D.

Authors:  Shumeng Jiang; Cheng Lyu; Peng Zhao; Wenjing Li; Wenyu Kong; Chenyu Huang; Guy M Genin; Yanan Du
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.