Literature DB >> 29677328

The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity.

Lisa M Hamm1, Janice P Yeoman1, Nicola Anstice1,2, Steven C Dakin1,3.   

Abstract

When measuring recognition acuity in a research setting, the most widely used symbols are the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) set of 10 Sloan letters. However, the symbols are not appropriate for patients unfamiliar with letters, and acuity for individual letters is variable. Alternative pictogram sets are available, but are generally comprised of fewer items. We set out to develop an open-access set of 10 pictograms that would elicit more consistent estimates of acuity across items than the ETDRS letters from visually normal adults. We measured monocular acuity for individual uncrowded optotypes within a newly designed set (The Auckland Optotype [TAO]), the ETDRS set, and Landolt Cs. Eleven visually normal adults were assessed on regular and vanishing formats of each set. Inter-optotype reliability and ability to detect subtle differences between participants were assessed using intraclass correlations (ICC) and fractional rank precision (FRP). The TAO vanishing set showed the strongest performance (ICC = 0.97, FRP = 0.90), followed by the other vanishing sets (Sloan ICC = 0.88, FRP = 0.74; Landolt ICC = 0.86, FRP = 0.80). Within the regular format, TAO again outperformed the existing sets (TAO ICC = 0.77, FRP = 0.75; Sloan ICC = 0.65, FRP = 0.64; Landolt ICC = 0.48, FRP = 0.63). For adults with normal visual acuity, the new optotypes (in both regular and vanishing formats) are more equally legible and sensitive to subtle individual differences than their Sloan counterparts. As this set does not require observers to be able to name Roman letters, and is freely available to use and modify, it may have wide application for measurement of acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29677328     DOI: 10.1167/18.3.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  6 in total

1.  The Order & Complexity Toolbox for Aesthetics (OCTA): A systematic approach to study the relations between order, complexity, and aesthetic appreciation.

Authors:  Eline Van Geert; Christophe Bossens; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-28

2.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Impact of Children's Postural Variation on Viewing Distance and Estimated Visual Acuity.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Kishan Mistry; Joanna M Black; Cameron C Grant; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Evaluation of vision screening of 5-15-year-old children in three Tongan schools: comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and Lea symbols.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Fiona Langridge; Joanna M Black; Nicola S Anstice; Mele Vuki; Toakase Fakakovikaetau; Cameron C Grant; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Psychophysical Validation of a Novel Active Learning Approach for Measuring the Visual Acuity Behavioral Function.

Authors:  Yukai Zhao; Luis Andres Lesmes; Michael Dorr; Peter J Bex; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Motion adaptation improves acuity (but perceived size doesn't matter).

Authors:  Selassie Tagoh; Lisa M Hamm; Dietrich S Schwarzkopf; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.