| Literature DB >> 29677214 |
Wenjuan Sun1, Xinju Li1, Beibei Niu1.
Abstract
Coal mining has led to increasingly serious land subsidence, and the reclamation of the subsided land has become a hot topic of concern for governments and scholars. Soil quality of reclaimed land is the key indicator to the evaluation of the reclamation effect; hence, rapid monitoring and evaluation of reclaimed land is of great significance. Visible-near infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy has been shown to be a rapid, timely and efficient tool for the prediction of soil organic carbon (SOC). In this study, 104 soil samples were collected from the Baodian mining area of Shandong province. Vis-NIR reflectance spectra and soil organic carbon content were then measured under laboratory conditions. The spectral data were first denoised using the Savitzky-Golay (SG) convolution smoothing method or the multiple scattering correction (MSC) method, after which the spectral reflectance (R) was subjected to reciprocal, reciprocal logarithm and differential transformations to improve spectral sensitivity. Finally, regression models for estimating the SOC content by the spectral data were constructed using partial least squares regression (PLSR). The results showed that: (1) The SOC content in the mining area was generally low (at the below-average level) and exhibited great variability. (2) The spectral reflectance increased with the decrease of soil organic carbon content. In addition, the sensitivity of the spectrum to the change in SOC content, especially that in the near-infrared band of the original reflectance, decreased when the SOC content was low. (3) The modeling results performed best when the spectral reflectance was preprocessed by Savitzky-Golay (SG) smoothing coupled with multiple scattering correction (MSC) and first-order differential transformation (modeling R2 = 0.86, RMSE = 2.00 g/kg, verification R2 = 0.78, RMSE = 1.81 g/kg, and RPD = 2.69). In addition, the first-order differential of R combined with SG, MSC with R, SG together with MSC and R also produced better modeling results than other pretreatment combinations. Vis-NIR modeling with specific spectral preprocessing methods could predict SOC content effectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29677214 PMCID: PMC5909913 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Study area and sample distribution.
Statistical parameters of organic carbon in soil samples.
| Soil sample set | Minimum value (g•kg-1) | Maximum value (g•kg-1) | Mean value (g•kg-1) | Standard deviation (g•kg-1) | Variation coefficient (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All samples | 0.79 | 27.72 | 11.34 | 5.09 | 44.86 |
| Training set | 1.19 | 27.72 | 11.55 | 5.14 | 44.50 |
| Validation set | 0.79 | 27.33 | 10.97 | 5.01 | 45.88 |
Fig 2Spectral characteristics of soils with different SOC contents.
Partial least squares modeling results of soil organic carbon.
| Model | Parameters | SG | MSC | SG+MSC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F(R) | Training set | R2 | 0.64 | 0.84 | 0.8 |
| RMSE | 3.21 | 2.11 | 2.36 | ||
| validation set | R2 | 0.35 | 0.72 | 0.71 | |
| RMSE (g•kg-1) | 3.53 | 2.04 | 2.27 | ||
| RPD | 1.47 | 2.25 | 2.24 | ||
| F(1/R) | Training set | R2 | 0.55 | 0.44 | 0.75 |
| RMSE (g•kg-1) | 2.7 | 4.37 | 2.97 | ||
| validation set | R2 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.39 | |
| RMSE (g•kg-1) | 4.23 | 4.01 | 4.75 | ||
| RPD | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.17 | ||
| F(lg(1/R)) | Training set | R2 | 0.52 | 0.23 | 0.46 |
| RMSE (g•kg-1) | 2.87 | 4.93 | 4.16 | ||
| validation set | R2 | 0.36 | 0.12 | 0.21 | |
| RMSE (g•kg-1) | 3.78 | 4.17 | 3.68 | ||
| RPD | 1.24 | 1.03 | 1.09 | ||
| F(R’) | Training set | R2 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.86 |
| RMSE (g•kg-1) | 2.92 | 2.3 | 2 | ||
| validation set | R2 | 0.66 | 0.24 | 0.78 | |
| RMSE (g•kg-1) | 1.91 | 5.64 | 1.81 | ||
| RPD | 2.44 | 1.01 | 2.69 | ||
| F(R”) | Training set | R2 | 0.28 | 0.15 | 0.25 |
| RMSE (g•kg-1) | 4.23 | 4.98 | 4.66 | ||
| validation set | R2 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.12 | |
| RMSE (g•kg-1) | 5.13 | 5.94 | 5.74 | ||
| RPD | 1.01 | 0.9 | 0.98 | ||
a F(x) is a model with “x” as an independent variable, X = R, 1/R, lg(1/R), R’, R”.
Fig 3Relationship between measured and predicted soil organic carbon.
Fig 4Correlation analysis between different soil organic carbon contents and spectral reflectance.