| Literature DB >> 24905998 |
Abstract
Since the late 1950s, land reclamation from lakes has been a common human disturbance to ecosystems in China. It has greatly diminished the lake area, and altered natural ecological succession. However, little is known about its impact on the carbon (C) cycle. We conducted an experiment to examine the variations of chemical properties of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and C mineralization under four land uses, i.e. coniferous forest (CF), evergreen broadleaf forest (EBF), bamboo forest (BF) and cropland (CL) in a reclaimed land area from Taihu Lake. Soils and lake sediments (LS) were incubated for 360 days in the laboratory and the CO2 evolution from each soil during the incubation was fit to a double exponential model. The DOM was analyzed at the beginning and end of the incubation using UV and fluorescence spectroscopy to understand the relationships between DOM chemistry and C mineralization. The C mineralization in our study was influenced by the land use with different vegetation and management. The greatest cumulative CO2-C emission was observed in BF soil at 0-10 cm depth. The active C pool in EBF at 10-25 cm had longer (62 days) mean residence time (MRT). LS showed the highest cumulative CO2-C and shortest MRT comparing with the terrestrial soils. The carbohydrates in DOM were positively correlated with CO2-C evolution and negatively correlated to phenols in the forest soils. Cropland was consistently an outlier in relationships between DOM chemistry and CO2-evolution, highlighting the unique effects that this land use on soil C cycling, which may be attributed the tillage practices. Our results suggest that C mineralization is closely related to the chemical composition of DOM and sensitive to its variation. Conversion of an aquatic ecosystem into a terrestrial ecosystem may alter the chemical structure of DOM, and then influences soil C mineralization.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24905998 PMCID: PMC4048317 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The map of study site in Xiaodian Lake area of the Taihu Lake basin China.
Soil total C concentration (TC), total N concentration (TN), dissolved organic M (DOM), microbial biomass C (MBC), pH and the bulk density of different land uses soils collected on reclaimed land from Taihu Lake, China.
| Site | TC | TN | DOM | MBC | pH | Bulk density | |
| Depth | Land use | (g C/kg Soil) | (g N/kg Soil) | (mg C/kg Soil) | (mg C/kg Soil) | (g cm−3) | |
| 0–10 cm | CF | 19.12±1.64b* | 2.24±0.15b* | 126.63±2.75a* | 214.50±5.77d* | 4.45±0.07d* | 1.22±0.03a* |
| EBF | 16.05±0.69bc* | 1.77±0.04b* | 93.50±2.56d* | 370.40±9.64c* | 4.78±0.08c | 1.18±0.03a | |
| BF | 35.35±1.79a* | 3.41±0.22a* | 110.50±2.40b* | 423.01±5.13b* | 4.13±0.06e* | 0.89±0.06b | |
| CL | 14.95±0.96c* | 1.84±0.10b* | 105.80±2.81bc* | 521.98±7.72a* | 5.67±0.08b* | 1.16±0.03a* | |
| LS | 16.14±1.38bc | 2.26±0.23b | 99.95±2.11cd* | 350.03±7.64c* | 6.19±0.02a | Nd | |
| 10–25 cm | CF | 8.34±0.53c | 1.18±0.07b | 97.72±4.50b | 112.77±4.43a | 4.89±0.15bc | 1.31±0.01a |
| EBF | 8.81±0.77c | 1.16±0.08b | 78.39±3.06c | 309.94±3.90c | 4.98±0.07b | 1.25±0.02a | |
| BF | 23.76±0.94a | 2.59±0.25a | 95.88±2.46b | 232.28±4.65d | 4.30±0.02c | 0.99±0.06b | |
| CL | 9.30±1.16c | 1.23±0.13b | 91.40±3.13b | 455.99±5.20b | 6.18±0.16a | 1.31±0.03a | |
| LS | 17.51±1.03b | 2.34±0.13c | 115.48±4.21a | 558.82±10.28e | 6.30±0.07a | Nd | |
Values are mean ± SE (n = 4). Means within a column of the corresponding depth followed by different letters are significantly different and * indicates the significant difference between the soil depth. (Significance at p<0.05).
CF: coniferous forest; EBF: evergreen broadleaf forest; BF: bamboo forest; CL: cropland; LS: lake sediment; Nd: Not determined.
Chemical properties of soil DOM at two soil depths under different land uses reclaimed from Taihu Lake, China.
| Site | SUVA254 | FE | HIXem | CHPheHi | ||||
| Depth | Land use | DOM | (l mg C−1 m−1) | (% of total DOM) | ||||
| 0–10 cm | CF | Initial | 2.30±0.06a* | 321.28±2.28b* | 1.76±0.11ab | 23.86±1.21b | 2.50±0.04b* | 32.71±1.38c* |
| Δ | 2.65±0.05a* | 29.62±1.95c | 4.17±0.11a* | 32.87±2.02a* | 4.68±0.22a* | 12.15±2.20b | ||
| EBF | Initial | 1.00±0.09d | 301.18±3.40b* | 1.64±0.03b | 21.83±0.49b* | 2.08±0.04c | 37.47±1.35b* | |
| Δ | 2.38±0.12b* | 95.03±5.61b* | 4.50±0.69a* | 25.40±0.51b* | 2.81±0.17b* | 8.72±1.91b | ||
| BF | Initial | 2.07±0.07b* | 252.31±3.26d* | 1.94±0.07a | 28.39±1.13a | 2.14±0.06c* | 29.22±1.14c* | |
| Δ | 1.05±0.06c | 216.67±6.46a* | 5.59±0.70a* | 4.70±0.37c* | 1.37±0.10c* | 19.90±2.17a | ||
| CL | Initial | 1.20±0.04c* | 430.40±2.29a* | 1.11±0.08c* | 18.98±1.02c* | 3.74±0.12a* | 61.75±0.70a | |
| Δ | 0.55±0.06d* | −59.55±6.02e* | 2.78±0.43b | 6.09±0.37c* | −2.61±0.11e* | −3.61±1.35c* | ||
| LS | Initial | 1.15±0.06c | 289.30±17.80c* | 1.68±0.11b | 11.25±0.72d* | 1.06±0.07d* | 59.58±1.19a* | |
| Δ | 0.47±0.07d* | −4.65±1.88d | 0.79±0.01c | −4.00±0.31d* | 0.25±0.07d* | 10.87±3.92b* | ||
| 10–25 cm | CF | Initial | 0.98±0.05b | 253.32±1.30d | 1.69±0.02a | 21.37±0.46b | 1.33±0.13c | 47.77±1.12a |
| Δ | 0.60±0.07b | 24.40±2.49bc | 1.84±0.23c | 6.74±0.17a | 1.72±0.06a | 7.31±1.48c | ||
| EBF | Initial | 1.20±0.06a | 408.93±4.16a | 1.07±0.02b | 15.35±0.79c | 2.18±0.09b | 52.48±0.70a | |
| Δ | 0.18±0.06c | 11.25±2.46c | 2.24±0.15b | 2.78±0.38b | 0.60±0.03a | 6.98±2.83c | ||
| BF | Initial | 1.30±0.06a | 170.44±2.17e | 1.88±0.02a | 26.14±0.81a | 1.51±0.02c | 46.18±0.49a | |
| Δ | 1.10±0.04a | 87.96±2.75a | 2.85±0.45a | −2.14±0.85c | 0.42±0.05a | 17.15±0.69b | ||
| CL | Initial | 0.78±0.05c | 316.91±2.46c | 0.48±0.02c | 11.28±0.55d | 0.92±0.04d | 56.06±1.65a | |
| Δ | 0.15±0.05c | 25.32±6.10b | 3.52±0.16a | 3.61±0.50b | −0.08±0.02c | 18.33±3.58b | ||
| LS | Initial | 1.23±0.05a | 350.29±11.95b | 1.60±0.27a | 24.81±0.37a | 3.49±0.12a | 40.76±1.08a | |
| Δ | 0.20±0.04c | −48.88±11.18d | 0.40±0.23d | −13.39±0.80d | 0.38±0.99b | 43.26±3.23a | ||
Results shown are characteristics of initial DOM and the variation of each characteristic at the end of 360 days incubation. Values are mean ± SE (n = 4). Means within a column of the corresponding depth followed by different letters are significantly different and * indicates the significant difference between the soil depth. (Significance at p<0.05).
CF: coniferous forest; EBF: evergreen broadleaf forest; BF: bamboo forest; CL: cropland; LS: lake sediment; SUVA254: specific UV absorbance at 254 nm; FE: fluorescence efficiency (Fmax/A254); HIXem: humification index using emission fluorescence spectra (ratio of areas: 435–480 nm/300–345 nm); CH: carbohydrate C; Phe: phenol C; Hi: hydrophilic C; initial: properties of initial samples (soils before incubation); Δ: variation of DOM chemical properties between the initial and final value during incubation.
Figure 2Carbon mineralized at the end of the 360 days incubation period for different land uses and lake sediments.
Bars represent standard errors (n = 4). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (p<0.05) of mean values of different sites. * indicates the significant difference (p<0.05) between the soil depth.
C mineralization kinetics of soil after 360 days incubation at 25°C: cumulative CO2-C, sizes of the labile and stable C pools, mineralization rate constants and mean residence times of the labile and the stable C pools.
| Site | Cm | Labile C | Stable C |
|
| MRT1 | MRT2 |
| |
| Depth | Land use | (%) | (%) | (%) | (day−1) | (day−1) | (days) | (years) | |
| 0–10 cm | CF | 12.24 | 0.75 | 99.25 | 0.03 | 0.00036 | 30.48 | 7.68 | 0.993 |
| EBF | 15.23 | 0.72 | 99.28 | 0.13 | 0.00048 | 7.82 | 5.80 | 0.979 | |
| BF | 8.11 | 0.20 | 99.80 | 0.10 | 0.00023 | 10.17 | 12.13 | 0.998 | |
| CL | 10.95 | 2.62 | 97.38 | 0.02 | 0.00022 | 53.13 | 12.60 | 0.999 | |
| LS | 28.71 | 1.13 | 98.87 | 0.19 | 0.00098 | 5.15 | 2.85 | 0.983 | |
| 10–25 cm | CF | 13.45 | 3.07 | 96.93 | 0.03 | 0.00032 | 33.27 | 8.67 | 0.995 |
| EBF | 10.11 | 4.81 | 95.19 | 0.02 | 0.00016 | 61.71 | 17.80 | 0.999 | |
| BF | 5.11 | 1.42 | 98.58 | 0.02 | 0.00011 | 48.62 | 26.11 | 0.999 | |
| CL | 21.07 | 1.70 | 98.30 | 0.07 | 0.00065 | 13.53 | 4.26 | 0.993 | |
| LS | 47.19 | 7.09 | 92.91 | 0.12 | 0.00128 | 8.11 | 2.16 | 0.957 | |
CF: coniferous forest; EBF: evergreen broadleaf forest; BF: bamboo forest; CL: cropland; LS: lake sediment; Cm: cumulative mineralized C as percentage of initial C in the soil. Labile C: rapidly mineralizable C (calculated using a double exponential model); Stable C: slowly mineralizable C (calculated using a double exponential model); k: mineralization rate constant of the labile C pool (double exponential model); k: Mineralization rate constant of the stable C pool (double exponential model); MRT1: Mean residence times of the labile C pool (MRT1 = 1/k); MRT2: Mean residence times of the stable C pool (MRT1 = 1/k); r: coefficient of determination of the double exponential model.
Values are mean (n = 4).
Figure 3Dynamics of C mineralization of soils under different land use types reclaimed from Taihu Lake, China.
(a): C mineralization at 0–10 cm depth; (b): C mineralization at 10–25 cm depth. Bars indicate the standard errors (n = 4).
Pearson correlation coefficients (r-value) between C mineralization and soil properties and chemical characteristics of DOM under four terrestrial land use types reclaimed from Taihu Lake, China.
| DOC | CH | ΔCH | Hi | ΔHi | Phe | ΔPhe | SUVA254 | ΔSUVA254 | FE | ΔFE | HIXem | ΔHIXem | ||
| 0–10 cm |
| −0.140 | −0.762 | −0.315 | 0.976 | −0.893 | 0.951 | −0.782 | −0.504 | −0.538 | 0.982 | −0.871 | −0.902 | −0.702 |
|
| −0.586 | 0.373 | 0.048 | −0.555 | 0.499 | −0.792 | 0.339 | −0.263 | 0.275 | −0.737 | 0.752 | 0.510 | 0.532 | |
|
| −0.285 | −0.148 | 0.803 | −0.346 | 0.090 | −0.548 | 0.666 | −0.289 | 0.849 | −0.283 | 0.043 | 0.210 | 0.106 | |
| MRT1 | 0.270 | −0.600 | −0.203 | 0.822 | −0.742 | 0.948 | −0.604 | −0.101 | −0.447 | 0.928 | −0.876 | −0.755 | −0.665 | |
| MRT2 | 0.130 | 0.099 | −0.886 | 0.414 | −0.145 | 0.562 | −0.762 | 0.142 | −0.921 | 0.305 | −0.031 | −0.268 | −0.117 | |
| CO2-C | 0.085 | 0.908 | 0.044 | −0.928 | 0.963 | −0.873 | 0.573 | 0.432 | 0.279 | −0.964 | 0.934 | 0.925 | 0.833 | |
| 10–25 cm |
| −0.600 | −0.263 | 0.390 | 0.135 | −0.696 | 0.755 | 0.368 | 0.200 | −0.499 | 0.776 | −0.688 | −0.954 | −0.534 |
|
| 0.170 | −0.653 | 0.276 | 0.642 | 0.466 | −0.796 | −0.483 | −0.819 | −0.456 | 0.090 | −0.230 | 0.575 | 0.586 | |
|
| −0.420 | 0.408 | −0.383 | −0.394 | −0.410 | 0.916 | 0.189 | 0.825 | 0.235 | 0.172 | 0.125 | 0.079 | 0.459 | |
| MRT1 | 0.142 | −0.710 | 0.469 | 0.662 | 0.318 | −0.758 | −0.322 | −0.886 | −0.560 | 0.199 | −0.404 | −0.700 | −0.436 | |
| MRT2 | −0.088 | 0.694 | −0.794 | −0.578 | 0.028 | 0.581 | −0.074 | 0.885 | 0.661 | −0.360 | 0.680 | 0.191 | −0.122 | |
| CO2-C | 0.310 | −0.446 | 0.014 | 0.423 | 0.736 | −0.853 | −0.581 | −0.748 | −0.223 | −0.122 | 0.012 | 0.940 | 0.754 |
n = 16; abbreviations see Table 2 and Table 3;
*Significance at p<0.05;
**Significance at p<0.01.
Figure 4Relationships between cumulative C mineralization and DOM chemical properties of the four land use types.
0–10 cm soil depth: a–f; 10–25 cm soil depth: g–l. (a and g) between carbohydrate carbon percentages and cumulative CO2-C, (b and h) between phenol carbon percentages and cumulative CO2-C, (c and i) between hydrophilic carbon and cumulative CO2-C, (d and j) between SUVA254 values and cumulative CO2-C, (e and k) between the fluorescence efficiency and cumulative CO2-C, (f and l) between the humification index (emission fluorescence spectra) and cumulative CO2-C. The curves for the figures are generated with the data of the CL samples excluded.