J P Real1, J D Luna2, S D Palma3. 1. Unidad de Investigación y Desarrollo en Tecnología Farmacéutica (UNITEFA), CONICET and Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Ciudad Universitaria, 5000, Córdoba, Argentina. 2. Vitreo-Retinal Department, Centro Privado de Ojos Romagosa SA - Fundación VER, Deán Funes 429/432, Córdoba, Argentina. 3. Unidad de Investigación y Desarrollo en Tecnología Farmacéutica (UNITEFA), CONICET and Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Ciudad Universitaria, 5000, Córdoba, Argentina. sdpalma@fcq.unc.edu.ar.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Summarize and compare the available evidence on the reactivation times in patients with age-related macular degeneration treated with Ranibizumab (RNB). METHOD: Systematic review of studies that reported the reactivation time of patients (direct method) or the number of injections received in a certain period of follow-up (indirect method). RESULTS: Only 18 of 89 selected studies reported the average reactivation time of patients in a manifest form, without the need of any calculation. The average calculated, weighted reactivation time was 101.8 days with the direct method and 99.8 days in the indirect method (84 studies included). With both methods, it was found that the average reactivation time of the RCTs was between 2 and 3 weeks less than the average time identified in the observational studies. These differences are also reflected in the clinical results, there being a correlation between the number of doses received and the change in BCVA. The analysis of 11 comparative studies showed a difference in reactivation times between patients treated with RNB or Bevacizumab (BVZ). CONCLUSION: There are few direct studies of reactivation time, but calculation from the PRN dose number turns out to be a good approximation for retrospective study of the variable. The use of the PRN, with criteria not based on optical coherence tomography scans, delays the application of doses between 2 or 3 weeks, and patients suffer loss of clinical benefits. RNB enables patients to receive less injections than BVZ throughout treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Summarize and compare the available evidence on the reactivation times in patients with age-related macular degeneration treated with Ranibizumab (RNB). METHOD: Systematic review of studies that reported the reactivation time of patients (direct method) or the number of injections received in a certain period of follow-up (indirect method). RESULTS: Only 18 of 89 selected studies reported the average reactivation time of patients in a manifest form, without the need of any calculation. The average calculated, weighted reactivation time was 101.8 days with the direct method and 99.8 days in the indirect method (84 studies included). With both methods, it was found that the average reactivation time of the RCTs was between 2 and 3 weeks less than the average time identified in the observational studies. These differences are also reflected in the clinical results, there being a correlation between the number of doses received and the change in BCVA. The analysis of 11 comparative studies showed a difference in reactivation times between patients treated with RNB or Bevacizumab (BVZ). CONCLUSION: There are few direct studies of reactivation time, but calculation from the PRN dose number turns out to be a good approximation for retrospective study of the variable. The use of the PRN, with criteria not based on optical coherence tomography scans, delays the application of doses between 2 or 3 weeks, and patients suffer loss of clinical benefits. RNB enables patients to receive less injections than BVZ throughout treatment.
Authors: Tien Y Wong; Tien Wong; Usha Chakravarthy; Ronald Klein; Paul Mitchell; Gergana Zlateva; Ronald Buggage; Kyle Fahrbach; Corey Probst; Isabella Sledge Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Frank G Holz; Winfried Amoaku; Juan Donate; Robyn H Guymer; Ulrich Kellner; Reinier O Schlingemann; Andreas Weichselberger; Giovanni Staurenghi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Serge Resnikoff; Donatella Pascolini; Daniel Etya'ale; Ivo Kocur; Ramachandra Pararajasegaram; Gopal P Pokharel; Silvio P Mariotti Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2004-12-14 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Yi Zhang; Zhenling Yao; Nitin Kaila; Peter Kuebler; Jennifer Visich; Mauricio Maia; Lisa Tuomi; Jason S Ehrlich; Roman G Rubio; Peter A Campochiaro Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 12.079