Literature DB >> 29675706

Audiomotor integration of angry and happy prosodies.

Sélim Yahia Coll1, Sascha Frühholz2, Didier Grandjean3.   

Abstract

Different parts of our brain code the perceptual features and actions related to an object, causing a binding problem: how does the brain discriminate the information of a particular event from the features of other events? Hommel (1998) suggested the event file concept: an episodic memory trace binding perceptual and motor information pertaining to an object. By adapting Hommel's paradigm to emotional faces in a previous study (Coll & Grandjean, 2016), we demonstrated that emotion could take part in an event file with motor responses. We also postulate such binding to occur with emotional prosodies, due to an equal importance of automatic reactions to such events. However, contrary to static emotional expressions, prosodies develop through time and temporal dynamics may influence the integration of these stimuli. To investigate this effect, we developed three studies with task-relevant and -irrelevant emotional prosodies. Our results showed that emotion could interact with motor responses when it was task relevant. When it was task irrelevant, this integration was also observed, but only when participants were led to focus on the details of the voices, that is, in a loudness task. No such binding was observed when participants performed a location task, in which emotion could be ignored. These results indicate that emotional binding is not restricted to visual information but is a general phenomenon allowing organisms to integrate emotion and action in an efficient and adaptive way. We discuss the influence of temporal dynamics in the emotion-action binding and the implication of Hommel's paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29675706     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1020-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  37 in total

1.  Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus-response bindings.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Jiska Memelink; Sharon Zmigrod; Lorenza S Colzato
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-25

3.  Conscious emotional experience emerges as a function of multilevel, appraisal-driven response synchronization.

Authors:  Didier Grandjean; David Sander; Klaus R Scherer
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2008-04-29

4.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

5.  The face-in-the-crowd effect: when angry faces are just cross(es).

Authors:  Carlos M Coelho; Steven Cloete; Guy Wallis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.

Authors:  A Ohman; D Lundqvist; F Esteves
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-03

7.  The eyes are sufficient to produce a threat superiority effect.

Authors:  Elaine Fox; Ljubica Damjanovic
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-08

8.  The face is more than its parts--brain dynamics of enhanced spatial attention to schematic threat.

Authors:  Mathias Weymar; Andreas Löw; Arne Ohman; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation-behavior link.

Authors:  Andreas B Eder; Karl Christoph Klauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-05

10.  The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings; Roland Pfister
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.