Literature DB >> 26501840

The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.

Birte Moeller1, Christian Frings1, Roland Pfister2.   

Abstract

Human action control is influenced by bindings between perceived stimuli and responses carried out in their presence. Notably, responses given to a target stimulus can also be integrated with additional response-irrelevant distractor stimuli that accompany the target (distractor-response binding). Subsequently reencountering such a distractor then retrieves the associated response. Although a large body of evidence supports the existence of this effect, the specific structure of distractor-response bindings is still unclear. Here, we test the predictions derived from 2 possible assumptions about the structure of bindings between distractors and responses. According to a configural approach, the entire distractor object is integrated with a response, and only upon repetition of the entire distractor object the associated response would be retrieved. According to an elemental approach, one would predict integration of individual distractor features with the response and retrieval due to the repetition of an individual distractor feature. Four experiments indicate that both, configural and elemental bindings exist and specify boundary conditions for each type of binding. These findings provide detailed insights into the architecture of bindings between response-irrelevant stimuli and actions and thus allow for specifying how distractor stimuli influence human behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26501840     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Selective binding of stimulus, response, and effect features.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Roland Pfister; Wilfried Kunde; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

2.  David and Goliath-size does matter: size modulates feature-response binding of irrelevant features.

Authors:  Tarini Singh; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-24

3.  Lost time: Bindings do not represent temporal order information.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

4.  Distractor-based retrieval in action control: the influence of encoding specificity.

Authors:  Ruth Laub; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-01

Review 5.  Building Blocks of Psychology: on Remaking the Unkept Promises of Early Schools.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Wei Sophia Deng
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2018-03

6.  Audiomotor integration of angry and happy prosodies.

Authors:  Sélim Yahia Coll; Sascha Frühholz; Didier Grandjean
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-19

7.  Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus-response integration.

Authors:  Philip Schmalbrock; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Goal-Based Binding of Irrelevant Stimulus Features for Action Slips.

Authors:  Anna Foerster; Klaus Rothermund; Juhi Jayesh Parmar; Birte Moeller; Christian Frings; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2021-07

10.  Saliency determines the integration of contextual information into stimulus-response episodes.

Authors:  Ruyi Qiu; Malte Möller; Iring Koch; Susanne Mayr
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.