Literature DB >> 29675388

Consistent comparison of angle Kappa adjustment between Oculyzer and Topolyzer Vario topography guided LASIK for myopia by EX500 excimer laser.

Ming-Shen Sun1, Li Zhang1, Ning Guo1, Yan-Zheng Song1, Feng-Ju Zhang1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate and compare the uniformity of angle Kappa adjustment between Oculyzer and Topolyzer Vario topography guided ablation of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) by EX500 excimer laser for myopia.
METHODS: Totally 145 cases (290 consecutive eyes )with myopia received LASIK with a target of emmetropia. The ablation for 86 cases (172 eyes) was guided manually based on Oculyzer topography (study group), while the ablation for 59 cases (118 eyes) was guided automatically by Topolyzer Vario topography (control group). Measurement of adjustment values included data respectively in horizontal and vertical direction of cornea.
RESULTS: Horizontally, synclastic adjustment between manually actual values (dxmanu) and Oculyzer topography guided data (dxocu) accounts 35.5% in study group, with mean dxmanu/dxocu of 0.78±0.48; while in control group, synclastic adjustment between automatically actual values (dxauto) and Oculyzer topography data (dxocu) accounts 54.2%, with mean dxauto/dxocu of 0.79±0.66. Vertically, synclastic adjustment between dymanu and dyocu accounts 55.2% in study group, with mean dymanu/dyocu of 0.61±0.42; while in control group, synclastic adjustment between dyauto and dyocu accounts 66.1%, with mean dyauto/dyocu of 0.66±0.65. There was no statistically significant difference in ratio of actual values/Oculyzer topography guided data in horizontal and vertical direction between two groups (P=0.951, 0.621).
CONCLUSION: There is high consistency in angle Kappa adjustment guided manually by Oculyzer and guided automatically by Topolyzer Vario topography during corneal refractive surgery by WaveLight EX500 excimer laser.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oculyzer; Topolyzer; adjustment; angle Kappa; laser in situ keratomileusis; uniformity

Year:  2018        PMID: 29675388      PMCID: PMC5902374          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.04.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  21 in total

1.  Optical Zone Centration Accuracy Using Corneal Fixation-based SMILE Compared to Eye Tracker-based Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Marine Gobbe; Louis Gobbe; Timothy J Archer; Glenn I Carp
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Eye axes and their relevance to alignment of corneal refractive procedures.

Authors:  James T Schwiegerling
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  A randomized comparison of pupil-centered versus vertex-centered ablation in LASIK correction of hyperopia.

Authors:  Vincent Soler; Antonio Benito; Pauline Soler; Claire Triozon; Jean-Louis Arné; Virginie Madariaga; Pablo Artal; François Malecaze
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  LASIK for Hyperopia Using an Aberration-Neutral Profile With an Asymmetric Offset Centration.

Authors:  Samuel Arba-Mosquera; Diego de Ortueta
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Topographic analysis of the centration of the treatment zone after SMILE for myopia and comparison to FS-LASIK: subjective versus objective alignment.

Authors:  Apostolos Lazaridis; Konstantinos Droutsas; Walter Sekundo
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Comparative analysis of the efficacy of astigmatic correction after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK in low and moderate myopic eyes.

Authors:  Mounir A Khalifa; Mahmoud F Alsahn; Mohamed Shafik Shaheen; David P Pinero
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism without iris registration, with iris registration, and with iris registration-assisted dynamic rotational eye tracking.

Authors:  Gaurav Prakash; Amar Agarwal; Dhivya Ashok Kumar; Soosan Jacob; Athiya Agarwal
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Safety, efficacy, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism with a 750 Hz scanning-spot laser system.

Authors:  Minoru Tomita; Miyuki Watabe; Satoshi Yukawa; Nobuo Nakamura; Tadayuki Nakamura; Thomas Magnago
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  A retrospective comparison of efficacy and safety of 680 consecutive lasik treatments for high myopia performed with two generations of flying-spot excimer lasers.

Authors:  Lola Gazieva; Mette Hjuler Beer; Kim Nielsen; Jesper Hjortdal
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Use of angle kappa in myopic photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Hamid Khakshoor; Michael V McCaughey; Amir Hossein Vejdani; Ramin Daneshvar; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.