Lene Bay1, Kasper N Kragh1, Steffen R Eickhardt1, Steen S Poulsen2, Lise Mette R Gjerdrum3, Khaled Ghathian4, Henrik Calum4, Magnus S Ågren5, Thomas Bjarnsholt1,6. 1. Costerton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark. 4. Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. 5. Copenhagen Wound Healing Center and Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 6. Department of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
Objective: The bacterial composition and distribution were evaluated in acute standardized epidermal wounds and uninjured skin by a molecular in situ technology benchmarked to conventional culturing. This was done to reveal whether bacterial biofilm is present in acute wounds. Approach: On the buttock of 26 healthy volunteers, 28 suction blisters were made and de-roofed. Four wounds were biopsied immediately after wounding, whereas the remaining 24 wounds were treated daily with sterile deionized water and covered with a moisture-retaining dressing. On day 4 post-wounding, swabs were obtained for culturing from the wounds and adjacent skin, and the wounds including adjacent skin were excised. Tissue sections were stained with peptide nucleic acid (PNA) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes, counterstained by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, and evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results: No bacterial aggregates were detected at day 0. At day 4, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were the sole bacteria identified by CLSM/PNA-FISH and culturing. CoNS was isolated from 78% of the wound swabs and 48% of the skin swabs. Bacterial aggregates (5-150 μm) were detected by PNA-FISH/CLSM in the split stratum corneum and fibrin deposits at the wound edges and in the stratum corneum and the hair follicles of the adjacent skin. The bacterial aggregates were more common (p = 0.0084) and larger (p = 0.0083) at wound edges than in the adjacent skin. Innovation: Bacterial aggregates can establish in all wound types and may have clinical significance in acute wounds. Conclusion: Bacterial aggregates were observed at the edges of acute epidermal wounds, indicating initiated establishment of a biofilm.
Objective: The bacterial composition and distribution were evaluated in acute standardized epidermal wounds and uninjured skin by a molecular in situ technology benchmarked to conventional culturing. This was done to reveal whether bacterial biofilm is present in acute wounds. Approach: On the buttock of 26 healthy volunteers, 28 suction blisters were made and de-roofed. Four wounds were biopsied immediately after wounding, whereas the remaining 24 wounds were treated daily with sterile deionized water and covered with a moisture-retaining dressing. On day 4 post-wounding, swabs were obtained for culturing from the wounds and adjacent skin, and the wounds including adjacent skin were excised. Tissue sections were stained with peptide nucleic acid (PNA) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes, counterstained by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, and evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results: No bacterial aggregates were detected at day 0. At day 4, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were the sole bacteria identified by CLSM/PNA-FISH and culturing. CoNS was isolated from 78% of the wound swabs and 48% of the skin swabs. Bacterial aggregates (5-150 μm) were detected by PNA-FISH/CLSM in the split stratum corneum and fibrin deposits at the wound edges and in the stratum corneum and the hair follicles of the adjacent skin. The bacterial aggregates were more common (p = 0.0084) and larger (p = 0.0083) at wound edges than in the adjacent skin. Innovation: Bacterial aggregates can establish in all wound types and may have clinical significance in acute wounds. Conclusion: Bacterial aggregates were observed at the edges of acute epidermal wounds, indicating initiated establishment of a biofilm.
Authors: Heidi F Larsen; Malin G Ahlström; Lise M R Gjerdrum; Mette Mogensen; Khaled Ghathian; Henrik Calum; Anne L Sørensen; Julie L Forman; Mark Vandeven; Marian N Holerca; Laurence Du-Thumm; Lars N Jorgensen; Magnus S Ågren Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Peter J Turnbaugh; Ruth E Ley; Micah Hamady; Claire M Fraser-Liggett; Rob Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon Journal: Nature Date: 2007-10-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Elizabeth A Grice; Heidi H Kong; Gabriel Renaud; Alice C Young; Gerard G Bouffard; Robert W Blakesley; Tyra G Wolfsberg; Maria L Turner; Julia A Segre Journal: Genome Res Date: 2008-05-23 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: H Perry-O'Keefe; S Rigby; K Oliveira; D Sørensen; H Stender; J Coull; J J Hyldig-Nielsen Journal: J Microbiol Methods Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 2.363
Authors: Thomas Bjarnsholt; Klaus Kirketerp-Møller; Peter Østrup Jensen; Kit G Madsen; Richard Phipps; Karen Krogfelt; Niels Høiby; Michael Givskov Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Hans Christian Ring; Lene Bay; Klaus Kallenbach; Iben M Miller; Errol Prens; Ditte M Saunte; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Gregor B E Jemec Journal: Acta Derm Venereol Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 4.437
Authors: Patrick R Secor; Lia A Michaels; DeAnna C Bublitz; Laura K Jennings; Pradeep K Singh Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 6.073
Authors: Sophie A Blirup-Plum; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Henrik E Jensen; Kasper N Kragh; Bent Aalbæk; Hans Gottlieb; Mats Bue; Louise K Jensen Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 5.853
Authors: Jessica M Gilbertie; Lauren V Schnabel; Noreen J Hickok; Megan E Jacob; Brian P Conlon; Irving M Shapiro; Javad Parvizi; Thomas P Schaer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Matthew J Pestrak; Tripti Thapa Gupta; Devendra H Dusane; Doug V Guzior; Amelia Staats; Jan Harro; Alexander R Horswill; Paul Stoodley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lene Bay; Christopher James Barnes; Blaine Gabriel Fritz; Jonathan Thorsen; Marlene Elise Møller Restrup; Linett Rasmussen; Johan Kløvgaard Sørensen; Anne Brun Hesselvig; Anders Odgaard; Anders Johannes Hansen; Thomas Bjarnsholt Journal: mBio Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Gabrielle S Dijksteel; Magda M W Ulrich; Marcel Vlig; Peter H Nibbering; Robert A Cordfunke; Jan W Drijfhout; Esther Middelkoop; Bouke K H L Boekema Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 3.944