| Literature DB >> 25663346 |
Steffen Eickhardt1, Kasper N Kragh2, Stine Schrøder3, Steen Seier Poulsen4, Henrik Sillesen5, Michael Givskov6, Niels Høiby2, Thomas Bjarnsholt2, Morten Alhede2.
Abstract
When looking at tissue sections of ex vivo samples, autofluorescence can be a major cause of artifacts and misinterpretations. We here reiterate evidence that autofluorescing granules, often hemosiderin but also ceroid or mucinogen granules, are severe obstacles when imaging and diagnosing biofilm infections through fluorescent imaging techniques. We used confocal laser scanning microscopy with spectral analysis for autofluorescence detection as well as standard histological stains in order to identify the culprit and show that these granules might very well be mistaken for bacterial biofilms. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the increased amount of autofluorescing granules may be a consequence of prolonged inflammation as a consequence of chronic biofilm infections. © FEMS 2015. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.Entities:
Keywords: Biofilm; CLSM; autofluorescence; hemosidirin
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25663346 DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftv012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathog Dis ISSN: 2049-632X Impact factor: 3.166