| Literature DB >> 29675250 |
Yao Sun1,2, Xiaodong Zeng1, Yuling Xiao1, Changhao Liu3, Hua Zhu3, Hui Zhou1, Ziyang Chen1, Fuchun Xu4, Jule Wang4, Mengyue Zhu5, Junzhu Wu5, Mei Tian6, Hong Zhang6, Zixin Deng1, Zhen Cheng3, Xuechuan Hong1,4.
Abstract
AccurateEntities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29675250 PMCID: PMC5892408 DOI: 10.1039/c7sc04774f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1A new strategy for the construction of NIR-II dual-modal imaging probes. (a) The previous photo-catalyzed thiol-yne reaction; (b) the approach discussed in the present work.
Base-catalyzed thiol-addition chemistry
|
| ||||||
| Entry | Catalyst |
| Thiol (equiv.) | Solvent | Yield | Product |
| 1 | Spontaneous | 30 | 1.0 eq. | DMF | 52 |
|
| 2 | TEMPO (10 equiv.) | 30 | 1.0 eq. | DMF | 49 |
|
| 3 | NEt3 (0.1 equiv.) | 30 | 1.0 eq. | DMF | 70 |
|
| 4 | DIPEA (0.1 equiv.) | 30 | 1.0 eq. | DMF | 80 |
|
| 5 | DBU (0.1 equiv.) | 30 | 1.0 eq. | DMF | 83 |
|
| 6 | DIPEA (0.1 equiv.) | 30 | 1.0 eq. | DCM | 82 |
|
| 7 | DIPEA (0.1 equiv.) | 30 | 1.0 eq. | MeOH | 85 |
|
| 8 | DIPEA (0.1 equiv.) | 30 | 1.0 eq. | THF | 80 |
|
| 9 | DIPEA (0.1 equiv.) | 30 | 1.0 eq. | PBS/DMF (8.2) | 80 |
|
| 10 | TBD (0.2 equiv.) | 60 | 4.0 eq. | DMF | 67 |
|
Reaction conditions: [alkyne] = 0.25 M in solvents, catalyst = 0.1 or 0.2 equiv.
Isolated yield calculated on the basis of the starting alkyne and referred to the major products.
Base-catalyzed addition of various functional molecules into propiolamide-based scaffolds
|
| |||||
| Entry | PA scaffolds | Thiol |
| Product | Yield (%) |
| 1 | R1 = c(RGDfK) ( | 2-AET-NOTA ( | 1.5 | R2 = 2-AET-NOTA ( | 58 |
| 2 | R1 = c(RGDfK) ( | 2-AET-Cy5.5 ( | 1.5 | R2 = 2-AET-Cy5.5 ( | 60 |
| 3 | R1 = c(RGDfK) ( | 2-AET-CH1055 ( | 1.5 | R2 = 2-AET-CH1055 ( | 60 |
| 4 | R1 = AE105 ( | 2-AET-CH1055 ( | 1.5 | R2 = 2-AET-CH1055 ( | 61 |
| 5 | R1 = JMV594 ( | 2-AET-CH1055 ( | 1.5 | R2 = 2-AET-CH1055 ( | 60 |
| 6 | R1 = AE105 ( | 2-AET | 2 | R2 = R3 = 2-AET ( | 58 |
| 7 | R1 = c(RGDfK) ( | 2-AET-NOTA ( | 2 | R2 = 2-AET-NOTA, R3 = 2AET-Cy5.5 ( | 47 |
The catalyst DIPEA for entries 1–5; TBD for entries 6–7.
c(RGDfK) = cyclo (Arg-Gly-Asp-d-Phe-Lys); AE105 = Ac-Lys-Gly-Asp-Cha-Phe-(D)Ser-(D)Arg-Tyr-Leu-Trp-Ser-NH2; JMV594 = (D)Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2.
2-AET is 2-aminoethanethiol; NOTA is 2-S-(4-isothiocyanatobenzyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid; Cy5.5 is cyanine 5.5.
Fig. 2(a) Fluorescence emission of CHS2 under 808 nm excitation; (b) photostability of CHS2 in water, PBS and serum under 808 nm laser illumination (105 mW cm–2) for 1 h; (c) photostability of ICG vs.CHS2 under 808 nm laser illumination (82 mW cm–2) for 1 h; (d) cellular toxicity of different concentrations of CHS2 in U87MG cell lines.
Fig. 3(a) The PET/CT images of U87MG-tumor-bearing mice (white arrows indicate the location of the tumor, n = 3 per group) acquired at 0.5, 1, and 2 h after tail vein injection of with and without the blocking agent RGD. (b) NIR-II images of the U87MG tumor at 1, 3, 9, 12, and 24 h after tail vein injection of CHS2 with and without the blocking agent RGD under 808 nm excitation (82 mW cm–2), 1000 LP and 40 ms.
Fig. 4(a–e) U87MG tumor delineation and image-guided surgery at 12 h after the tail vein injection of CHS2 under 808 nm excitation (82 mW cm–2), 1000 LP and 23 ms. (f) The tumor cells in this resected specimen were confirmed by high-power magnification (400×) of histological sections; (g) H&E-staining of the whole tumor. (h) The little muscle fibers marked as 1 were adjacent to the tumor tissue; (i) the brown band marked as 2 is the normal epithelium of the margin of the resected specimen; (j and k) the pink erythrocyte marked as 3 and 4 indicates the vessels in the margin of the tumor; (l) histological analysis of the excised para-cancerous tissue at 400× magnification. Cancer histologic characteristics were not detected in this para-cancerous tissue.