| Literature DB >> 29675009 |
Giuseppe Firrao1,2, Emanuela Torelli1, Cesare Polano1, Patrizia Ferrante3, Francesca Ferrini1, Marta Martini1, Simone Marcelletti3, Marco Scortichini3, Paolo Ermacora1.
Abstract
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) biovar 3 caused pandemic bacterial canker of Actinidia chinensis and Actinidia deliciosa since 2008. In Europe, the disease spread rapidly in the kiwifruit cultivation areas from a single introduction. In this study, we investigated the genomic diversity of Psa biovar 3 strains during the primary clonal expansion in Europe using single molecule real-time (SMRT), Illumina and Sanger sequencing technologies. We recorded evidences of frequent mobilization and loss of transposon Tn6212, large chromosome inversions, and ectopic integration of IS sequences (remarkably ISPsy31, ISPsy36, and ISPsy37). While no phenotype change associated with Tn6212 mobilization could be detected, strains CRAFRU 12.29 and CRAFRU 12.50 did not elicit the hypersensitivity response (HR) on tobacco and eggplant leaves and were limited in their growth in kiwifruit leaves due to insertion of ISPsy31 and ISPsy36 in the hrpS and hrpR genes, respectively, interrupting the hrp cluster. Both strains had been isolated from symptomatic plants, suggesting coexistence of variant strains with reduced virulence together with virulent strains in mixed populations. The structural differences caused by rearrangements of self-genetic elements within European and New Zealand strains were comparable in number and type to those occurring among the European strains, in contrast with the significant difference in terms of nucleotide polymorphisms. We hypothesize a relaxation, during clonal expansion, of the selection limiting the accumulation of deleterious mutations associated with genome structural variation due to transposition of mobile elements. This consideration may be relevant when evaluating strategies to be adopted for epidemics management.Entities:
Keywords: Illumina technology; bacterial canker; genomic diversity; hypersensitivity response (HR); single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing
Year: 2018 PMID: 29675009 PMCID: PMC5895724 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00656
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Strains and sequences used in this work.
| CRAFRU 14.08 | Psa 354 | Portugal | 2010 | This work | + | + | – | |||
| CRAFRU 12.29 | 23b | Italy (Piemonte) | 2011 | This work | – | – | – | |||
| CRAFRU 14.25 | our isolate | Italy (Latium) | 2012 | This work | + | + | + | n.a. | ||
| CRAFRU 12.54 | 1616-291a | Italy (Piemonte) | 2011 | This work | + | + | + | n.a. | ||
| CRAFRU 14.10 | Psa 490 | Italy (Calabria) | 2010 | This work | + | + | + | n.a. | ||
| CRAFRU 12.64 | 1616-231Aa | Italy (Piemonte) | 2010 | This work | + | + | + | n.a. | ||
| CRAFRU 10.29 | 4252 A,1 | Italy (Emilia Romagna) | 2009 | This work | + | + | + | n.a. | ||
| CRAFRU 12.50 | our isolate | Italy (Campania) | 2011 | This work | – | – | – | n.a. | ||
| CRAFRU 14.21 | 37.51 | France | 2011 | This work | + | + | – | n.a. | ||
| CRAFRU 13.27 | IVIA 3729.2 | Spain | 2011 | This work | + | + | – | n.a. | ||
| CRAFRU 8.43 | our isolate | Italy (Latium) | 2008 | Marcelletti et al., | + | + | + | n.a. | ||
| CRAFRU 13.04 | ICMP 18884 | New Zealand | 2010 | Templeton et al., | n.i. | n.i. | n.i. | |||
| 7286 | Italy | Mazzaglia et al., | ||||||||
| ICMP 18708, V13 | New Zealand | Poulter et al., unpublished | n.a. | |||||||
Not Investigated.
Deposited as Poulter, R. T. M., Poulter, G. T. M., Stockwell, P. A., Lamont, I. L., and Butler, M. I. (unpublished).
Figure 1(A) Symptoms on kiwifruit leaves 2 and 15 days post inoculation (dpi) with CRA-FRU 8.43, CRA-FRU 12.29, and CRA-FRU 12.50. (B) Population dynamics of Psa strains CRAFRU 8.43 (HR+), CRAFRU 12.29 (HR–), and CRAFRU12.50 (HR–) after inoculation of kiwifruit leaves.
Figure 2Mauve alignment of the chromosomes of strains CRAFRU 14.08, CRAFRU 12.29, and ICMP 18708.
Figure 3Drawing of part of the hrp cluster of Psa, with the location of the insertion of (A) ISPsy31 in strain CRAFRU 12.29 and (B) ISPsy36 in strain CRAFRU 12.50.
SNPs identified among the strains used in this work by Illumina reads mapping. Position relative to the chromosome of CRAFRU 14.08.
| 32022 | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | C | G | G | G |
| 1537885 | C | T | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | T | C | C |
| 1791521 | G | G | G | G | G | G | C | G | G | G | G | G |
| 1791522 | G | G | G | G | G | G | C | G | G | G | G | G |
| 2109838 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | T | C | C | C |
| 2554115 | G | G | A | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | G |
| 3540152 | A | T | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| 3540154 | C | T | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 3932833 | C | C | C | T | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 4207959 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | T | C |
| 4262863 | G | G | T | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | G |
| 5267844 | C | A | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 5268734 | C | C | C | C | C | C | A | C | C | C | C | C |
| 5346399 | A | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T |
| 5379834 | C | C | C | C | A | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 5719829 | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | T | G | G | G |
| 5803673 | C | C | C | C | C | C | G | C | C | C | C | C |
| 6189845 | C | C | T | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 6357274 | C | C | T | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
Figure 4Evidence of integration/excision of Tn6212. (Left) Agarose gels of PCR amplification products with (A) primers fX1/rX4 (686 bp) that amplify the chromosome region resulting from excision, (B) primers fX3/rX4 (739 bp) that amplify the downstream transposon junction, and (C) primers fX1/rX2 (933 bp) that amplify the upstream transposon junction, as indicated in the top scheme of PCR primers positions. (Right) Density of reads mapping on Tn6212 and flanking regions. The numbers indicate the CRAFRU strains.
Figure 5Boxplot of the estimated bacterial population in the upper (Top) and lower (Bottom) part of the stem 10 days after inoculation with strains CRAFRU 8.43 and CRAFRU 14.08.