Literature DB >> 29673740

Recent intrauterine device use and the risk of precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer.

Sarah Averbach1, Michael J Silverberg2, Wendy Leyden2, Karen Smith-McCune3, Tina Raine-Bennett2, George F Sawaya3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Understanding the effect of contraceptives on the development of precancerous lesions of the cervix and cervical cancer may provide information that is valuable to women in contraceptive decision-making. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between recent intrauterine device (IUD) use (by type) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2, 3, adenocarcinoma in situ or cancer (CIN2+ or CIN3+). STUDY
DESIGN: Case-control study of 17,559 women age 18-49 with incident CIN2+ cases and 5:1 age-matched, incidence-density selected controls (N=87,378) who were members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California Healthcare System from 1996 to 2014. Recent IUD use, within 18 months prior to index, was the exposure of interest.
RESULTS: We identified 1,657 IUD users among the cases and 7,925 IUD users among controls. After adjusting for sexually transmitted infection testing, smoking, HPV vaccination, hormonal contraceptive use, parity, race and number of outpatient healthcare system visits, IUD use was associated with an increased rate of CIN2+ [rate ratio (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (1.05-1.18), p<0.001] but not CIN3+ [RR 1.02 (0.93-1.11), p=0.71]. Levonorgestrel-IUD use was associated with an increased rate of CIN2+ [RR 1.18 (1.08-1.30), p<0.001] but not CIN3+ [RR 1.05 (0.91-1.21), p=0.48]. Copper-IUD use was not associated with CIN2+ [RR 0.88 (0.75-1.04), p=0.13] or CIN3+ [RR 0.81 (0.64-1.02), p=0.07].
CONCLUSION: Recent IUD use had variable weak associations with CIN2+ but was not associated with increased risk of CIN3+. IMPLICATIONS: Recent levonorgestrel-IUD use may be associated with CIN2, a lesion with a high rate of regression, but not CIN3, which is considered a true pre-cancerous lesion. The observed association between levonorgestrel-IUDs and CIN2+ was modest but warrants further investigation. It may have clinical importance for contraceptive counseling if this finding is shown to be consistent across other studies and other populations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Cervical dysplasia; IUD; Intrauterine contraception

Year:  2018        PMID: 29673740      PMCID: PMC6192861          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  24 in total

1.  Oral contraceptives and cervical cancer: critique of a recent review.

Authors:  Kate Miller; Paul Blumenthal; Kelly Blanchard
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  F X Bosch; A Lorincz; N Muñoz; C J L M Meijer; K V Shah
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Mechanism of action of intrauterine devices: biochemical changes.

Authors:  E Johannisson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Tubal sterilization and use of an IUD and risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  H Q Li; D B Thomas; S K Jin; F Wu
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2000-04

Review 5.  Cervical cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data for 16,573 women with cervical cancer and 35,509 women without cervical cancer from 24 epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Paul Appleby; Valerie Beral; Amy Berrington de González; Didier Colin; Silvia Franceschi; Adrian Goodhill; Jane Green; Julian Peto; Martyn Plummer; Siân Sweetland
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Intrauterine Device Use and Cervical Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victoria K Cortessis; Malcolm Barrett; Niquelle Brown Wade; Temuulen Enebish; Judith L Perrigo; Jessica Tobin; Charlie Zhong; Jennifer Zink; Vanessa Isiaka; Laila I Muderspach; Melissa Natavio; Roberta McKean-Cowdin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  A case-control study of risk factors for invasive cervical cancer among U.S. women exposed to oncogenic types of human papillomavirus.

Authors:  Tammy S Shields; Louise A Brinton; Robert D Burk; Sophia S Wang; Stephanie J Weinstein; Regina G Ziegler; Yevgeniy Y Studentsov; Mary McAdams; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Neoplasia with use of intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Kathryn M Curtis; Polly A Marchbanks; Herbert B Peterson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Parity as a cofactor for high-grade cervical disease among women with persistent human papillomavirus infection: a 13-year follow-up.

Authors:  K E Jensen; S Schmiedel; B Norrild; K Frederiksen; T Iftner; S K Kjaer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The Influence of Hormonal Factors on the Risk of Developing Cervical Cancer and Pre-Cancer: Results from the EPIC Cohort.

Authors:  Esther Roura; Noémie Travier; Tim Waterboer; Silvia de Sanjosé; F Xavier Bosch; Michael Pawlita; Valeria Pala; Elisabete Weiderpass; Núria Margall; Joakim Dillner; Inger T Gram; Anne Tjønneland; Christian Munk; Domenico Palli; Kay-Tee Khaw; Kim Overvad; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Sylvie Mesrine; Agnès Fournier; Renée T Fortner; Jennifer Ose; Annika Steffen; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Philippos Orfanos; Giovanna Masala; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Silvia Polidoro; Amalia Mattiello; Eiliv Lund; Petra H Peeters; H B as Bueno-de-Mesquita; J Ramón Quirós; María-José Sánchez; Carmen Navarro; Aurelio Barricarte; Nerea Larrañaga; Johanna Ekström; David Lindquist; Annika Idahl; Ruth C Travis; Melissa A Merritt; Marc J Gunter; Sabina Rinaldi; Massimo Tommasino; Silvia Franceschi; Elio Riboli; Xavier Castellsagué
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Adverse Effects of Levonorgestrel Emergency Oral Contraceptive.

Authors:  Nattawut Leelakanok; Janthima Methaneethorn
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  The Use of Copper as an Antimicrobial Agent in Health Care, Including Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Linda P Arendsen; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  The effect of age On cervical cancer screening in women aged 20-29.

Authors:  Hasan Aykut Tuncer; Serap Fırtına Tuncer
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 0.780

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.