Juliet M Silberstein1, Amy E Pinkham2, David L Penn3, Philip D Harvey4. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States. 2. School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, United States. 3. Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Department of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States; Research Service, Miami VA Healthcare System, United States. Electronic address: pharvey@miami.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Impairments in self-assessment are common in people with schizophrenia and impairments in self-assessment of cognitive ability have been found to predict impaired functional outcome. In this study, we examined self-assessment of social cognitive ability and related them to assessments of social cognition provided by informants, to performance on tests of social cognition, and to everyday outcomes. The difference between self-reported social cognition and informant ratings was used to predict everyday functioning. METHODS: People with schizophrenia (n=135) performed 8 different tests of social cognition. They were asked to rate their social cognitive abilities on the Observable Social Cognition Rating Scale (OSCARs). High contact informants also rated social cognitive ability and everyday outcomes, while unaware of the patients' social cognitive performance and self-assessments. Social competence was measured with a performance-based assessment and clinical ratings of negative symptoms were also performed. RESULTS: Patient reports of their social cognitive abilities were uncorrelated with performance on social cognitive tests and with three of the four domains of functional outcomes. Differences between self-reported and informant rated social cognitive ability predicted impaired everyday functioning across all four functional domains. This difference score predicted disability even when the influences of social cognitive performance, social competence, and negative symptoms were considered. IMPLICATIONS: Mis-estimation of social cognitive ability was an important predictor of social and nonsocial outcomes in schizophrenia compared to performance on social cognitive tests. These results suggest that consideration of self-assessment is critical when attempting to evaluate the causes of disability and when trying to implement interventions targeting disability reduction.
BACKGROUND: Impairments in self-assessment are common in people with schizophrenia and impairments in self-assessment of cognitive ability have been found to predict impaired functional outcome. In this study, we examined self-assessment of social cognitive ability and related them to assessments of social cognition provided by informants, to performance on tests of social cognition, and to everyday outcomes. The difference between self-reported social cognition and informant ratings was used to predict everyday functioning. METHODS:People with schizophrenia (n=135) performed 8 different tests of social cognition. They were asked to rate their social cognitive abilities on the Observable Social Cognition Rating Scale (OSCARs). High contact informants also rated social cognitive ability and everyday outcomes, while unaware of the patients' social cognitive performance and self-assessments. Social competence was measured with a performance-based assessment and clinical ratings of negative symptoms were also performed. RESULTS:Patient reports of their social cognitive abilities were uncorrelated with performance on social cognitive tests and with three of the four domains of functional outcomes. Differences between self-reported and informant rated social cognitive ability predicted impaired everyday functioning across all four functional domains. This difference score predicted disability even when the influences of social cognitive performance, social competence, and negative symptoms were considered. IMPLICATIONS: Mis-estimation of social cognitive ability was an important predictor of social and nonsocial outcomes in schizophrenia compared to performance on social cognitive tests. These results suggest that consideration of self-assessment is critical when attempting to evaluate the causes of disability and when trying to implement interventions targeting disability reduction.
Authors: Anne-Kathrin J Fett; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Maria-de-Gracia Dominguez; David L Penn; Jim van Os; Lydia Krabbendam Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Samir Sabbag; Elizabeth W Twamley; Lea Vella; Robert K Heaton; Thomas L Patterson; Philip D Harvey Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: James M Gold; Deanna M Barch; Cameron S Carter; Steven Dakin; Steven J Luck; Angus W MacDonald; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath; Ilona Kovacs; Steven M Silverstein; Milton Strauss Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Kristin M Healey; Dennis R Combs; Clare M Gibson; Richard S E Keefe; David L Roberts; David L Penn Journal: Cogn Neuropsychiatry Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 1.871
Authors: Christian G Kohler; Travis H Turner; Warren B Bilker; Colleen M Brensinger; Steven J Siegel; Stephen J Kanes; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Vicente Balanzá-Martínez; José Sánchez-Moreno; Anabel Martinez-Aran; José Salazar-Fraile; Gabriel Selva-Vera; Cristina Rubio; Ignacio Mata; Manuel Gómez-Beneyto; Eduard Vieta Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Dante Durand; Martin Strassnig; Samir Sabbag; Felicia Gould; Elizabeth W Twamley; Thomas L Patterson; Philip D Harvey Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Philip D Harvey; Elizabeth Deckler; Mackenzie T Jones; L Fredrik Jarskog; David L Penn; Amy E Pinkham Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Michelle M Perez; Bianca A Tercero; Fiorella Durand; Felicia Gould; Raeanne C Moore; Colin A Depp; Robert A Ackerman; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey Journal: Psychiatry Res Commun Date: 2022-06-26
Authors: Isabelle Lanser; Julia Browne; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey; L Fredrik Jarskog; David L Penn Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Lisa N Oliveri; Adam W Awerbuch; L Fredrik Jarskog; David L Penn; Amy Pinkham; Philip D Harvey Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Dante Durand; Martin T Strassnig; Raeanne C Moore; Colin A Depp; Robert A Ackerman; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Bianca A Tercero; Michelle M Perez; Noreen Mohsin; Raeanne C Moore; Colin A Depp; Robert A Ackerman; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 5.250