Literature DB >> 18289698

Neurocognitive and clinical predictors of functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder at one-year follow-up.

Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos1, Vicente Balanzá-Martínez, José Sánchez-Moreno, Anabel Martinez-Aran, José Salazar-Fraile, Gabriel Selva-Vera, Cristina Rubio, Ignacio Mata, Manuel Gómez-Beneyto, Eduard Vieta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many studies have reported that cognitive ability may be predictive of the functional outcome for patients with schizophrenia. However, no study has prospectively examined these aspects in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders simultaneously. The present study attempted to analyze if neurocognition and clinical status predicts the real-life functioning for patients with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder, using a longitudinal design.
METHOD: Forty-seven schizophrenic and 43 bipolar I outpatients were assessed twice with a neurocognitive battery (Executive Functions, Working Memory, Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Visual-Motor Processing, Vigilance, Vocabulary and Motor Speed tasks), clinical scales (the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Clinician Administered Rating Scale for Mania) and functional outcome measures (the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, the WHO's Disability Assessment Scale and occupational adaptation level) over a one-year follow-up period. The cognitive performance of the patients was compared, at baseline and one year later, with that of 25 healthy subjects.
RESULTS: In schizophrenia patients, global functioning one year later was predicted by a composite neurocognitive score and three specific domain (verbal memory, motor speed, vocabulary). Symptoms appeared to explain less of the variance in functioning. In bipolar I patients, changes in the composite neurocognitive score over one year, deficits in the visual/motor processing domain, severity of symptoms (psychotic, excitatory and affective symptoms) and premorbid adjustment at the first assessment were the variables that better predicted functioning or disability changes over follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the relationships between cognition, symptoms and functional capacity differ for schizophrenia or bipolar I patients, neuropsychological performance seems to be a principal longitudinal predictor of functioning in both disorders. Baseline neurocognition and cognitive changes over 12 months predicted changes in functioning over the same period, but only in bipolar I patients. These cognitive domains could be potential neurocognitive endophenotypes (endophenocognitypes) with regard to bipolar I disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18289698     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.12.234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  71 in total

1.  Emotion in bipolar I disorder: Implications for functional and symptom outcomes.

Authors:  Sheri L Johnson; Jordan A Tharp; Andrew D Peckham; Kaja J McMaster
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  Factors associated with occupational and academic status in patients with first-episode psychosis with a particular focus on neurocognition.

Authors:  Marte Tandberg; Torill Ueland; Ole A Andreassen; Kjetil Sundet; Ingrid Melle
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Prediction of real-world functional disability in chronic mental disorders: a comparison of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Christopher R Bowie; Colin Depp; John A McGrath; Paula Wolyniec; Brent T Mausbach; Mary H Thornquist; James Luke; Thomas L Patterson; Philip D Harvey; Ann E Pulver
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Improving Health Outcomes for Patients with Depression: A Population Health Imperative. Report on an Expert Panel Meeting.

Authors:  Janice L Clarke; Alexis Skoufalos; Alice Medalia; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  Anticipating DSM-V: opportunities and challenges for cognition and psychosis.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Richard S E Keefe
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Using the cognitive assessment interview to screen cognitive impairment in psychosis.

Authors:  Ana M Sánchez-Torres; María Rosa Elosúa; Ruth Lorente-Omeñaca; Lucía Moreno-Izco; Victor Peralta; Joseph Ventura; Manuel J Cuesta
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  Clinical implications of cognitive function in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  C T Sudhir Kumar; Sophia Frangou
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Neurological and psychiatric diseases and their unique cognitive profiles: implications for nursing practice and research.

Authors:  David E Vance; Joan E Dodson; Jason Watkins; Bridgett H Kennedy; Norman L Keltner
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.230

9.  The switch from conventional to atypical antipsychotic treatment should not be based exclusively on the presence of cognitive deficits. A pilot study in individuals with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gabriel Selva-Vera; Vicent Balanzá-Martínez; José Salazar-Fraile; José Sánchez-Moreno; Anabel Martinez-Aran; Patricia Correa; Eduard Vieta; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Cognitive functioning in patients with bipolar disorder: association with depressive symptoms and alcohol use.

Authors:  Marieke J van der Werf-Eldering; Huibert Burger; Esther A E Holthausen; André Aleman; Willem A Nolen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.