Kelly A Bowden Davies1,2, Victoria S Sprung3,4, Juliette A Norman3,4, Andrew Thompson5, Katie L Mitchell6, Jason C G Halford6, Jo A Harrold6, John P H Wilding3,7, Graham J Kemp3,8, Daniel J Cuthbertson3,4. 1. Musculoskeletal Biology II, Institute of Ageing & Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. k.bowden-davies@liverpool.ac.uk. 2. Obesity and Endocrinology Research Group, Clinical Sciences Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK. k.bowden-davies@liverpool.ac.uk. 3. Musculoskeletal Biology II, Institute of Ageing & Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 4. Obesity and Endocrinology Research Group, Clinical Sciences Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK. 5. Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 6. Department of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 7. Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Ageing & Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 8. Liverpool Magnetic Resonance Imaging Centre (LiMRIC), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Low physical activity levels and sedentary behaviour are associated with obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. We investigated the effects of a short-term reduction in physical activity with increased sedentary behaviour on metabolic profiles and body composition, comparing the effects in individuals with first-degree relatives with type 2 diabetes (FDR+ve) vs those without (FDR-ve). METHODS: Forty-five habitually active participants (16 FDR+ve [10 female, 6 male] and 29 FDR-ve [18 female, 11 male]; age 36 ± 14 years) were assessed at baseline, after 14 days of step reduction and 14 days after resuming normal activity. We determined physical activity (using a SenseWear armband), cardiorespiratory fitness ([Formula: see text]), body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry/magnetic resonance spectroscopy) and multi-organ insulin sensitivity (OGTT) at each time point. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-factor between-groups ANCOVA, with data presented as mean ± SD or (95% CI). RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in physical activity either at baseline or following step reduction. During the step-reduction phase, average daily step count decreased by 10,285 steps (95% CI 9389, 11,182; p < 0.001), a reduction of 81 ± 8%, increasing sedentary time by 223 min/day (151, 295; p < 0.001). Pooling data from both groups, following step reduction there was a significant decrease in whole-body insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) (p < 0.001), muscle insulin sensitivity index (p < 0.001), cardiorespiratory fitness (p = 0.002) and lower limb lean mass (p = 0.004). Further, there was a significant increase in total body fat (p < 0.001), liver fat (p = 0.001) and LDL-cholesterol (p = 0.013), with a borderline significant increase in NEFA AUC during the OGTT (p = 0.050). Four significant between-group differences were apparent: following step reduction, FDR+ve participants accumulated 1.5% more android fat (0.4, 2.6; p = 0.008) and increased triacylglycerol by 0.3 mmol/l (0.1, 0.6; p = 0.044). After resuming normal activity, FDR+ve participants engaged in lower amounts of vigorous activity (p = 0.006) and had lower muscle insulin sensitivity (p = 0.023). All other changes were reversed with no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: A short-term reduction in physical activity with increased sedentary behaviour leads to a reversible reduction in multi-organ insulin sensitivity and cardiorespiratory fitness, with concomitant increases in central and liver fat and dyslipidaemia. The effects are broadly similar in FDR+ve and FDR-ve individuals. Public health recommendations promoting physical activity should incorporate advice to avoid periods of sedentary behaviour.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Low physical activity levels and sedentary behaviour are associated with obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. We investigated the effects of a short-term reduction in physical activity with increased sedentary behaviour on metabolic profiles and body composition, comparing the effects in individuals with first-degree relatives with type 2 diabetes (FDR+ve) vs those without (FDR-ve). METHODS: Forty-five habitually active participants (16 FDR+ve [10 female, 6 male] and 29 FDR-ve [18 female, 11 male]; age 36 ± 14 years) were assessed at baseline, after 14 days of step reduction and 14 days after resuming normal activity. We determined physical activity (using a SenseWear armband), cardiorespiratory fitness ([Formula: see text]), body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry/magnetic resonance spectroscopy) and multi-organ insulin sensitivity (OGTT) at each time point. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-factor between-groups ANCOVA, with data presented as mean ± SD or (95% CI). RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in physical activity either at baseline or following step reduction. During the step-reduction phase, average daily step count decreased by 10,285 steps (95% CI 9389, 11,182; p < 0.001), a reduction of 81 ± 8%, increasing sedentary time by 223 min/day (151, 295; p < 0.001). Pooling data from both groups, following step reduction there was a significant decrease in whole-body insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) (p < 0.001), muscle insulin sensitivity index (p < 0.001), cardiorespiratory fitness (p = 0.002) and lower limb lean mass (p = 0.004). Further, there was a significant increase in total body fat (p < 0.001), liver fat (p = 0.001) and LDL-cholesterol (p = 0.013), with a borderline significant increase in NEFA AUC during the OGTT (p = 0.050). Four significant between-group differences were apparent: following step reduction, FDR+ve participants accumulated 1.5% more android fat (0.4, 2.6; p = 0.008) and increased triacylglycerol by 0.3 mmol/l (0.1, 0.6; p = 0.044). After resuming normal activity, FDR+ve participants engaged in lower amounts of vigorous activity (p = 0.006) and had lower muscle insulin sensitivity (p = 0.023). All other changes were reversed with no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: A short-term reduction in physical activity with increased sedentary behaviour leads to a reversible reduction in multi-organ insulin sensitivity and cardiorespiratory fitness, with concomitant increases in central and liver fat and dyslipidaemia. The effects are broadly similar in FDR+ve and FDR-ve individuals. Public health recommendations promoting physical activity should incorporate advice to avoid periods of sedentary behaviour.
Entities:
Keywords:
Body composition; Cardiorespiratory fitness; Glucose tolerance; Insulin resistance; Liver fat; Physical activity; Sedentary behaviour; Skeletal muscle; Type 2 diabetes
Authors: E G Wilmot; C L Edwardson; F A Achana; M J Davies; T Gorely; L J Gray; K Khunti; T Yates; S J H Biddle Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Sine Haugaard Knudsen; Louise Seier Hansen; Maria Pedersen; Thomas Dejgaard; Jakob Hansen; Gerrit Van Hall; Carsten Thomsen; Thomas P J Solomon; Bente Klarlund Pedersen; Rikke Krogh-Madsen Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-05-03
Authors: Chris McGlory; Mark T von Allmen; Tanner Stokes; Robert W Morton; Amy J Hector; Briony A Lago; Amogelang R Raphenya; Brennan K Smith; Andrew G McArthur; Gregory R Steinberg; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Leigh Breen; Keith A Stokes; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Daniel R Moore; Stephen K Baker; Kenneth Smith; Philip J Atherton; Stuart M Phillips Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Timothy S Church; Diana M Thomas; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Conrad P Earnest; Ruben Q Rodarte; Corby K Martin; Steven N Blair; Claude Bouchard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mark S Tremblay; Salomé Aubert; Joel D Barnes; Travis J Saunders; Valerie Carson; Amy E Latimer-Cheung; Sebastien F M Chastin; Teatske M Altenburg; Mai J M Chinapaw Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-06-10 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Shauna D O'Donovan; Michael Lenz; Gijs H Goossens; Carla J H van der Kallen; Simone J M P Eussen; Coen D A Stehouwer; Marleen M van Greevenbroek; Miranda T Schram; Simone J Sep; Ralf L M Peeters; Ellen E Blaak; Natal A W van Riel; Theo M C M de Kok; Ilja C W Arts Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: James Casella-Mariolo; Lidia Castagneto-Gissey; Giulia Angelini; Andrea Zoli; Pierluigi Marini; Stefan R Bornstein; Dimitri J Pournaras; Francesco Rubino; Carel W le Roux; Geltrude Mingrone; Giovanni Casella Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 8.143
Authors: Kelly A Bowden Davies; Samuel Pickles; Victoria S Sprung; Graham J Kemp; Uazman Alam; Daniel R Moore; Abd A Tahrani; Daniel J Cuthbertson Journal: Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 3.565
Authors: Małgorzata Bronikowska; Jana Krzysztoszek; Marlena Łopatka; Mateusz Ludwiczak; Beata Pluta Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Melania Prete; Anna Luzzetti; Livia S A Augustin; Giuseppe Porciello; Concetta Montagnese; Ilaria Calabrese; Giada Ballarin; Sergio Coluccia; Linia Patel; Sara Vitale; Elvira Palumbo; Egidio Celentano; Carlo La Vecchia; Anna Crispo Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: María Martinez-Ferran; Fernando de la Guía-Galipienso; Fabián Sanchis-Gomar; Helios Pareja-Galeano Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Amanda L Hannan; Michael P Harders; Wayne Hing; Mike Climstein; Jeff S Coombes; James Furness Journal: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Date: 2019-07-30