| Literature DB >> 29670658 |
Katyakyini Muniandy1, Sivapragasam Gothai1, Woan Sean Tan1, S Suresh Kumar2, Norhaizan Mohd Esa3, Govindasamy Chandramohan4, Khalid S Al-Numair4, Palanisamy Arulselvan1,5.
Abstract
Impaired wound healing is one of the serious problems among the diabetic patients. Currently, available treatments are limited due to side effects and cost effectiveness. In line with that, we attempted to use a natural source to study its potential towards the wound healing process. Therefore, Alternanthera sessilis (A. sessilis), an edible and medicinal plant, was chosen as the target sample for the study. During this investigation, the wound closure properties using stem extract of A. sessilis were analyzed. Accordingly, we analyzed the extract on free radical scavenging capacity and the cell migration of two most prominent cell types on the skin, human dermal fibroblast (NHDF), keratinocytes (HaCaT), and diabetic human dermal fibroblast (HDF-D) to mimic the wound healing in diabetic patients. The bioactive compounds were identified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). We discovered that the analysis exhibited a remarkable antioxidant, proliferative, and migratory rate in NHDF, HaCaT, and HDF-D in dose-dependent manner, which supports wound healing process, due to the presence of wound healing associated phytocompounds such as Hexadecanoic acid. This study suggested that the stem extract of A. sessilis might be a potential therapeutic agent for skin wound healing, supporting its traditional medicinal uses.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29670658 PMCID: PMC5836361 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3142073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The DPPH scavenging action of stem extract of A. sessilis increased in a concentration-dependent manner. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 2Effect of ethanolic extract of A. sessilis stem on viability of NHDF (a), HaCaT (b), and HDF-D (c). Cell viability following incubation with indicated concentrations of crude extract for 24 h was determined using the MTT assay. Cell viability is expressed as a percentage of untreated cells. Results shown in the graphs are mean ± SD obtained from triplicate experiments.
Figure 4In vitro scratch assay (×40 magnification). NHDF (a), HaCaT (b), and HDF-D (c) cells were scratched and treated with and without treatment of varying concentrations of plant extract. Ethanolic extract of stem part of A. sessilis showed positive cell proliferation and cell migration as compared with control group (without treatment).
Figure 3The migration rate in percentage for NHDF (a), HaCaT (b), and HDF-D (c) after treatment with stem extract of A. sessilis for 24 hrs. Quantitative analysis of the migration rate was analyzed with the use of ImageJ software. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation from three individual experiments. P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 versus control group.
Figure 5Gas chromatogram for stem extract of A. sessilis.
Total compounds identified in the crude extract of stem part of A. sessilis using GC-MS analysis with its retention time, peak area, and reported biological activities.
| Peak number | Compounds |
|
| Reported biological activities | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Pentanal <n-> | 2.612 | 1.95 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 2. | Formic acid, 2-propenyl ester | 2.660 | 1.71 | No reported activity | |
|
| |||||
| 4. | Butyrolactone | 7.868 | 0.69 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 6. | Furfural <5-methyl-> | 9.532 | 1.3 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 7. | Phenylacetaldehyde | 13.139 | 1.09 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 8. | 2,4-Dihydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furan-3-one | 17.793 | 8.92 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 9. | 1,2,4-Trioxolane,3-phenyl- | 19.295 | 5.99 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 19. | Phenol, 2-ethyl-4,5-dimethyl- | 25.763 | 5.00 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 21. | L-glutamic acid | 29.262 | 5.04 | Acts as amino acid | [ |
|
| |||||
| 22 | Glutamine, L- | 32.014 | 0.55 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 27. | Neophytadiene | 46.544 | 1.08 | Antipyretic | [ |
|
| |||||
| 29. | Phytone | 46.930 | 1.29 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 30. | Hexadecanoate <methyl-> | 49.924 | 0.92 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 31. | Hexadecanoic acid <n-> | 51.394 | 7.21 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 33. | Palmitate <ethyl-> | 52.193 | 5.65 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 35. | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester | 55.519 | 0.76 | Anticancer | [ |
|
| |||||
| 36. | Phytol | 55.977 | 4.33 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 37. | Z-3,17-Octadecadien-1-ol acetate | 57.593 | 4.32 |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 38. | 11-(3-Ethenylcyclopentyl) | 57.814 | 2.22 | No reported activity | |
|
| |||||
| 47. | Sebacic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester | 74.948 | 0.77 |
| [ |
R.T: retention time; P.A (%): peak area concentration.
Figure 6