| Literature DB >> 29670117 |
W T Fuhrman1, J R Chamorro2,3, P A Alekseev4,5, J-M Mignot6, T Keller7,8, J A Rodriguez-Rivera9,10, Y Qiu10, P Nikolić2,11, T M McQueen2,3,12, C L Broholm2,12.
Abstract
Samarium hexaboride (SmB6) is a Kondo insulator, with a narrow gap due to hybridization between localized and conduction electrons. Despite being an insulator, many samples show metal-like properties. Rare-earth purification is exceedingly difficult, and nominally pure samples may contain 2% or more of impurities. Here to determine the effects of rare-earth doping on SmB6, we synthesized and probed a series of gadolinium-doped samples. We found a relationship between specific heat and impurity moment screening which scales systematically. Consistent with this finding, our neutron scattering experiments of a high purity sample of doubly isotopic 154Sm11B6 show no intrinsic excitations below the well-established 13 meV spin-exciton. The result of introducing impurities into a Kondo insulator is incompletely understood, but it is clear from our measurements that there is a systematic relationship between rare-earth impurities and metal-like properties in SmB6.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29670117 PMCID: PMC5906653 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04007-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Magnetization of SmB6. a Raw magnetization of 1.85% Gd-doped sample and isotopic 154Sm11B6(colors). After removing a linear magnetization (dashed line) from both, the residual magnetization looks decidedly paramagnetic (dotted line in main figure shows 1.85%, inset shows isotopic on a smaller scale). We ascribe the linear contribution as intrinsic to SmB6 and the residual magnetization to impurities. Details of the fitting are included in Supplementary Note 1. b Residual magnetization of 4.8% Gd-doped sample at 2 K, 5 K, and 10 K, vs μ0H/T. Insets show the Wilson Ratio, Rw, of this sample becoming approximately constant at low temperatures and the similarity of χ(T) to the Kondo impurity model rather than a Curie-like susceptibility (constant Van Vleck contribution has been removed). gEff in the Rw was determined by . c Residual magnetization at 2 K of samples with varying doping levels. Inset shows that at 10 K a data collapse is achieved when scaling MImp and H/T with (1 + Jη) and 1/(1 + Jη), respectively
Fig. 2Heat Capacity of Gd and La-doped SmB6. a Raw heat capacity over temperature. The uptick is most dramatic in the heavily Gd-doped samples, while 5% La introduces a predominantly linear heat capacity at much lower magnitude per impurity than Gd doping. b Heat capacity of Gd-doped samples with lattice contribution (βT3) removed, then scaled by Jη as determined from magnetization data. The same value of β = 0.2 (mJ K−4 mol−1) is used for all samples, obtained from ref. [41]. Previously published results for heat capacity of isotopic SmB6 at low temperatures are scaled and included in red[27]. The scaled C/T data is fit by Tε−1 where ε = 0.02. Inset shows Jη as a function of Gd concentration is proportional to c where α = 0.7(1)). Previously published ESR result (from g-factor shift) is included as an open circle[38]
Fig. 3Normalized resistance and exciton lifetime. a Resistance of 4.8% Gd-doped (5.5 × 1 × 1 mm3 rod) and isotopically purified 154Sm11B6 (2 × 2 × 1 mm3 chip). In the doped sample, R(T) increases monotonically with decreasing T. Inset shows R(T) for the 4.8% Gd sample on a linear scale, which above 10 K fits to an exponentially activated form with a gap of 4.3(4) meV (orange line). b Spin-exciton lifetime and mode energy (inset) vs T. Solid line shows ), with non-thermal lifetime meV and temperature dependence from exponential activation to the mode energy Δ = 12.8 meV). Dashed line is the lifetime estimated from coupling the collective mode to a DOS at EF ( meV). Error bars described in Methods
Fig. 4Low energy neutron scattering of SmB6 taken at 1.6 K and 200 mK. a Energy integrated from 0.2 to 1.3 meV. Left shows 9 T data with the 0 T data subtracted (9 T−0 T). Right shows the data sets averaged (9 T + 0 T). No substantial scattering is apparent in either, aside from the Bragg tail at 100 and low background scattering. b 0 T data from 1.5 meV to 5 meV. Only residual Bragg/phonon scattering is present. c 9 T−0 T data. There is no discernible field dependence of the low energy scattering. d Average of 9 T and 0 T data. The only substantial signal is residual Bragg scattering and weak phonon scattering at (100), along with a background powder ring at 0.8 RLU (seen as a very weak ring in the right side of (a). Again, no magnetic scattering is evident. e 9 T−0 T Scattering integrated from . This includes all scattering in the HKK plane between the low angle limitation of the instrument and the first Bragg peak, and shows no evidence of magnetic scattering. f 9 T−0 T scattering integrated from 0.2 meV to 1.3 meV. No field-dependent scattering is evident. The only substantial deviation from zero occurs at the 100 Bragg peak, attributed to counting statistics as seen in c. Error bars described in Methods