OBJECTIVE: To identify the perspectives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on electronic recording of between-visit disease activity and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and on sharing this information with health care providers or peers. METHODS: Patients with RA were recruited to participate in focus groups from December 2014 to April 2015. The topic guide and analysis were based on the Andersen-Newman framework. Sessions were audiorecorded, transcribed, independently coded, and analyzed for themes. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients participated in 7 focus groups. Their mean ± SD age was 51 ± 13.1 years, 94% were women, 52% were African American, 11% were Hispanic, and 37% were white. Three themes emerged: provider communication, information-seeking about RA, and social and peer support. Participants expressed a willingness to track disease activity data to share with health care providers electronically if providers would act on the information. Participants envisioned symptom tracking and information sharing as a mechanism to relay and obtain reliable information about RA. Participants were also interested in electronic communication between visits if it facilitated learning about symptom management and enhanced opportunities for social support among patients with RA. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA may be amenable to electronic collection and sharing of PRO-type data between clinical encounters if it facilitates communication with health care providers and provides access to reliable information about RA. Providing patients with social support was important for enhancing PROs collection by helping them overcome barriers by using electronic devices and overcome reservations about the value of these data.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the perspectives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on electronic recording of between-visit disease activity and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and on sharing this information with health care providers or peers. METHODS:Patients with RA were recruited to participate in focus groups from December 2014 to April 2015. The topic guide and analysis were based on the Andersen-Newman framework. Sessions were audiorecorded, transcribed, independently coded, and analyzed for themes. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients participated in 7 focus groups. Their mean ± SD age was 51 ± 13.1 years, 94% were women, 52% were African American, 11% were Hispanic, and 37% were white. Three themes emerged: provider communication, information-seeking about RA, and social and peer support. Participants expressed a willingness to track disease activity data to share with health care providers electronically if providers would act on the information. Participants envisioned symptom tracking and information sharing as a mechanism to relay and obtain reliable information about RA. Participants were also interested in electronic communication between visits if it facilitated learning about symptom management and enhanced opportunities for social support among patients with RA. CONCLUSION:Patients with RA may be amenable to electronic collection and sharing of PRO-type data between clinical encounters if it facilitates communication with health care providers and provides access to reliable information about RA. Providing patients with social support was important for enhancing PROs collection by helping them overcome barriers by using electronic devices and overcome reservations about the value of these data.
Authors: Jie Zhang; Ying Shan; George Reed; Joel Kremer; Jeffrey D Greenberg; Scott Baumgartner; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jasvinder A Singh; Daniel E Furst; Aseem Bharat; Jeffrey R Curtis; Arthur F Kavanaugh; Joel M Kremer; Larry W Moreland; James O'Dell; Kevin L Winthrop; Timothy Beukelman; S Louis Bridges; W Winn Chatham; Harold E Paulus; Maria Suarez-Almazor; Claire Bombardier; Maxime Dougados; Dinesh Khanna; Charles M King; Amye L Leong; Eric L Matteson; John T Schousboe; Eileen Moynihan; Karen S Kolba; Archana Jain; Elizabeth R Volkmann; Harsh Agrawal; Sangmee Bae; Amy S Mudano; Nivedita M Patkar; Kenneth G Saag Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jasvinder A Singh; Kenneth G Saag; S Louis Bridges; Elie A Akl; Raveendhara R Bannuru; Matthew C Sullivan; Elizaveta Vaysbrot; Christine McNaughton; Mikala Osani; Robert H Shmerling; Jeffrey R Curtis; Daniel E Furst; Deborah Parks; Arthur Kavanaugh; James O'Dell; Charles King; Amye Leong; Eric L Matteson; John T Schousboe; Barbara Drevlow; Seth Ginsberg; James Grober; E William St Clair; Elizabeth Tindall; Amy S Miller; Timothy McAlindon Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Nita G Valikodath; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Paul P Lee; David C Musch; Leslie M Niziol; Maria A Woodward Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Vibeke Strand; Philip Mease; Gerd R Burmester; Enkeleida Nikaï; Geoffroy Coteur; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Bernard Combe; Edward C Keystone; Arthur Kavanaugh Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Andréa Marques; Philipp Bosch; Annette de Thurah; Yvette Meissner; Louise Falzon; Chetan Mukhtyar; Johannes Wj Bijlsma; Christian Dejaco; Tanja A Stamm Journal: RMD Open Date: 2022-05
Authors: Martin Krusche; Philipp Klemm; Manuel Grahammer; Johanna Mucke; Diana Vossen; Arnd Kleyer; Philipp Sewerin; Johannes Knitza Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Felix Muehlensiepen; Johannes Knitza; Wenke Marquardt; Jennifer Engler; Axel Hueber; Martin Welcker Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Annette de Thurah; Andrea Marques; Savia de Souza; Cynthia S Crowson; Elena Myasoedova Journal: Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 5.346