Literature DB >> 26545825

2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Jasvinder A Singh1, Kenneth G Saag1, S Louis Bridges1, Elie A Akl2, Raveendhara R Bannuru3, Matthew C Sullivan3, Elizaveta Vaysbrot3, Christine McNaughton3, Mikala Osani3, Robert H Shmerling4, Jeffrey R Curtis1, Daniel E Furst5, Deborah Parks6, Arthur Kavanaugh7, James O'Dell8, Charles King9, Amye Leong10, Eric L Matteson11, John T Schousboe12, Barbara Drevlow13, Seth Ginsberg14, James Grober13, E William St Clair15, Elizabeth Tindall16, Amy S Miller17, Timothy McAlindon3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a new evidence-based, pharmacologic treatment guideline for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: We conducted systematic reviews to synthesize the evidence for the benefits and harms of various treatment options. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of evidence. We employed a group consensus process to grade the strength of recommendations (either strong or conditional). A strong recommendation indicates that clinicians are certain that the benefits of an intervention far outweigh the harms (or vice versa). A conditional recommendation denotes uncertainty over the balance of benefits and harms and/or more significant variability in patient values and preferences.
RESULTS: The guideline covers the use of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in early (<6 months) and established (≥6 months) RA. In addition, it provides recommendations on using a treat-to-target approach, tapering and discontinuing medications, and the use of biologic agents and DMARDs in patients with hepatitis, congestive heart failure, malignancy, and serious infections. The guideline addresses the use of vaccines in patients starting/receiving DMARDs or biologic agents, screening for tuberculosis in patients starting/receiving biologic agents or tofacitinib, and laboratory monitoring for traditional DMARDs. The guideline includes 74 recommendations: 23% are strong and 77% are conditional.
CONCLUSION: This RA guideline should serve as a tool for clinicians and patients (our two target audiences) for pharmacologic treatment decisions in commonly encountered clinical situations. These recommendations are not prescriptive, and the treatment decisions should be made by physicians and patients through a shared decision-making process taking into account patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.
© 2015, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26545825     DOI: 10.1002/acr.22783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  266 in total

1.  A tool for empirical equipoise assessment in multigroup comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Kazuki Yoshida; Daniel H Solomon; Sebastien Haneuse; Seoyoung C Kim; Elisabetta Patorno; Sara K Tedeschi; Houchen Lyu; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Longitudinal Occurrence and Predictors of Patient-Provider Discordance Between Global Assessments of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Divya N V Challa; Zoran Kvrgic; Cynthia S Crowson; Eric L Matteson; Thomas G Mason; Clement J Michet; Daniel E Schaffer; Kerry A Wright; John M Davis
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  A new CHO (Chinese hamster ovary)-derived cell line expressing anti-TNFα monoclonal antibody with biosimilar potential.

Authors:  Mateus Dalcin Luchese; Mariana Lopes Dos Santos; Angelica Garbuio; Roselaine Campos Targino; Carla Ploeger Mansueli; Lilian Rumi Tsuruta; Wagner Quintilio; Ana Maria Moro
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 4.  Altering the natural history of rheumatoid arthritis: The role of immunotherapy and biologics in orthopaedic care.

Authors:  Steven J Girdler; Ivan Ye; Ray Tang; Noah Kirschner
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-07-01

5.  Effects of miR-150-5p on the growth and SOCS1 expression of rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts.

Authors:  Mingliang Qiu; Lisha Mo; Juxiang Li; Hua Liang; Weina Zhu; Xiangjuan Zheng; Xinwang Duan; Weidong Xu
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Impact of Cost-Sharing Increases on Continuity of Specialty Drug Use: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Pengxiang Li; Tianyan Hu; Xinyan Yu; Salim Chahin; Nabila Dahodwala; Marissa Blum; Amy R Pettit; Jalpa A Doshi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Patient preferences for rheumatoid arthritis treatment.

Authors:  Betty Hsiao; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 8.  The emerging safety profile of JAK inhibitors in rheumatic disease.

Authors:  Kevin L Winthrop
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 9.  Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug effect of denosumab on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Gonçalo Boleto; Moustapha Dramé; Isabelle Lambrecht; Jean-Paul Eschard; Jean-Hugues Salmon
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Muscle loss following a single high-dose intramuscular injection of corticosteroids to treat disease flare in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Andrew B Lemmey; Thomas J Wilkinson; Celine M Perkins; Luke A Nixon; Fazal Sheikh; Jeremy G Jones; Yasmeen A Ahmad; Thomas D O'brien
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2018-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.