Haiden A Huskamp1, Lauren E Riedel1, Colleen L Barry2, Alisa B Busch3. 1. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 3. McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Efficacious medications to treat opioid use disorders (OUDs) have been slow to diffuse into practice, and insurance coverage limits may be one important barrier. OBJECTIVES: To compare coverage for medications used to treat OUDs and opioids commonly prescribed for pain management in plans offered on the 2017 Health Insurance Marketplace exchanges. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified a sample of 100 plans offered in urban and in rural counties on the 2017 Marketplaces, weighting by population. We accessed publicly available plan coverage information on healthcare.gov for states with a federally facilitated exchange, the state exchange website for state-based exchanges, and insurer websites. RESULTS: About 14% of plans do not cover any formulations of buprenorphine/naloxone. Plans were more likely to require prior authorization for any of the covered office-based buprenorphine or naltrexone formulations preferred for maintenance OUD treatment (ie, buprenorphine/naloxone, buprenorphine implants, injectable long-acting naltrexone) than of short-acting opioid pain medications (63.6% vs. 19.4%; P<0.0001). Only 10.6% of plans cover implantable buprenorphine, 26.1% cover injectable naltrexone, and 73.4% cover at least 1 abuse-deterrent opioid pain medication. CONCLUSIONS: Many Marketplace plans either do not cover or require prior authorization for coverage of OUD medications, and these restrictions are often more common for OUD medications than for short-acting opioid pain medications. Regulators tasked with enforcement of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, which requires that standards for formulary design for mental health and substance use disorder drugs be comparable to those for other medications, should focus attention on formulary coverage of OUD medications.
BACKGROUND: Efficacious medications to treat opioid use disorders (OUDs) have been slow to diffuse into practice, and insurance coverage limits may be one important barrier. OBJECTIVES: To compare coverage for medications used to treat OUDs and opioids commonly prescribed for pain management in plans offered on the 2017 Health Insurance Marketplace exchanges. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified a sample of 100 plans offered in urban and in rural counties on the 2017 Marketplaces, weighting by population. We accessed publicly available plan coverage information on healthcare.gov for states with a federally facilitated exchange, the state exchange website for state-based exchanges, and insurer websites. RESULTS: About 14% of plans do not cover any formulations of buprenorphine/naloxone. Plans were more likely to require prior authorization for any of the covered office-based buprenorphine or naltrexone formulations preferred for maintenance OUD treatment (ie, buprenorphine/naloxone, buprenorphine implants, injectable long-acting naltrexone) than of short-acting opioid pain medications (63.6% vs. 19.4%; P<0.0001). Only 10.6% of plans cover implantable buprenorphine, 26.1% cover injectable naltrexone, and 73.4% cover at least 1 abuse-deterrent opioid pain medication. CONCLUSIONS: Many Marketplace plans either do not cover or require prior authorization for coverage of OUD medications, and these restrictions are often more common for OUD medications than for short-acting opioid pain medications. Regulators tasked with enforcement of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, which requires that standards for formulary design for mental health and substance use disorder drugs be comparable to those for other medications, should focus attention on formulary coverage of OUD medications.
Authors: Christine Y Lu; Alyce S Adams; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Fang Zhang; Yuting Zhang; Carl Salzman; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Colleen M Grogan; Christina Andrews; Amanda Abraham; Keith Humphreys; Harold A Pollack; Bikki Tran Smith; Peter D Friedmann Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Nicholas B King; Veronique Fraser; Constantina Boikos; Robin Richardson; Sam Harper Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Stephen B Soumerai; Fang Zhang; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Daniel E Ball; Robert F LeCates; Michael R Law; Tom E Hughes; Daniel Chapman; Alyce S Adams Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Alyce S Adams; Fang Zhang; Robert F LeCates; Amy Johnson Graves; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Daniel Gilden; Thomas J McLaughlin; Christine Lu; Connie M Trinacty; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-04-27
Authors: Tulshi D Saha; Bradley T Kerridge; Risë B Goldstein; S Patricia Chou; Haitao Zhang; Jeesun Jung; Roger P Pickering; W June Ruan; Sharon M Smith; Boji Huang; Deborah S Hasin; Bridget F Grant Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Jennifer Miles; Jason Howell; Dave Sheridan; George Braucht; Amy Mericle Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Haiden A Huskamp; Sharon Reif; Shelly F Greenfield; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Alisa B Busch Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Katherine Mackey; Stephanie Veazie; Johanna Anderson; Donald Bourne; Kim Peterson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Parisa Bozorgi; Jan M Eberth; Jeannie P Eidson; Dwayne E Porter Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 3.390