Literature DB >> 29668379

Predictability, force, and (anti)resonance in complex object control.

Pauline Maurice1, Neville Hogan2,3, Dagmar Sternad1,4,5.   

Abstract

Manipulation of complex objects as in tool use is ubiquitous and has given humans an evolutionary advantage. This study examined the strategies humans choose when manipulating an object with underactuated internal dynamics, such as a cup of coffee. The dynamics of the object renders the temporal evolution complex, possibly even chaotic, and difficult to predict. A cart-and-pendulum model, loosely mimicking coffee sloshing in a cup, was implemented in a virtual environment with a haptic interface. Participants rhythmically manipulated the virtual cup containing a rolling ball; they could choose the oscillation frequency, whereas the amplitude was prescribed. Three hypotheses were tested: 1) humans decrease interaction forces between hand and object; 2) humans increase the predictability of the object dynamics; and 3) humans exploit the resonances of the coupled object-hand system. Analysis revealed that humans chose either a high-frequency strategy with antiphase cup-and-ball movements or a low-frequency strategy with in-phase cup-and-ball movements. Counter to hypothesis 1, they did not decrease interaction force; instead, they increased the predictability of the interaction dynamics, quantified by mutual information, supporting hypothesis 2. To address hypothesis 3, frequency analysis of the coupled hand-object system revealed two resonance frequencies separated by an antiresonance frequency. The low-frequency strategy exploited one resonance, whereas the high-frequency strategy afforded more choice, consistent with the frequency response of the coupled system; both strategies avoided the antiresonance. Hence, humans did not prioritize small interaction forces but rather strategies that rendered interactions predictable. These findings highlight that physical interactions with complex objects pose control challenges not present in unconstrained movements. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Daily actions involve manipulation of complex nonrigid objects, which present a challenge since humans have no direct control of the whole object. We used a virtual-reality experiment and simulations of a cart-and-pendulum system coupled to hand movements with impedance to analyze the manipulation of this underactuated object. We showed that participants developed strategies that increased the predictability of the object behavior by exploiting the resonance structure of the object but did not minimize the hand-object interaction force.

Entities:  

Keywords:  impedance; interaction force; motor skill; object manipulation; prediction; resonance; rhythmic movements

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29668379      PMCID: PMC6139444          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00918.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Average phase difference theory and 1:1 phase entrainment in interlimb coordination.

Authors:  D Sternad; M T Turvey; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Energy margins in dynamic object manipulation.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Tian Shen; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Dynamical structure of hand trajectories during pole balancing.

Authors:  Tyler Cluff; Michael A Riley; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination. I. Relative phase dynamics.

Authors:  G Schöner; J A Kelso
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Coordination between digit forces and positions: interactions between anticipatory and feedback control.

Authors:  Qiushi Fu; Marco Santello
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Passive vs. active control of rhythmic ball bouncing: the role of visual information.

Authors:  Isabelle A Siegler; Benoît G Bardy; William H Warren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Experimentally confirmed mathematical model for human control of a non-rigid object.

Authors:  Jonathan B Dingwell; Christopher D Mah; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Portable Motion-Analysis Device for Upper-Limb Research, Assessment, and Rehabilitation in Non-Laboratory Settings.

Authors:  Won Joon Sohn; Rifat Sipahi; Terence D Sanger; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.316

2.  Highlights from the 28th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neural Control of Movement.

Authors:  Kevin A Mazurek; Michael Berger; Tejapratap Bollu; Raeed H Chowdhury; Naveen Elangovan; Irene A Kuling; M Hongchul Sohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Separating neural influences from peripheral mechanics: the speed-curvature relation in mechanically constrained actions.

Authors:  James Hermus; Joseph Doeringer; Dagmar Sternad; Neville Hogan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stability and predictability in human control of complex objects.

Authors:  Salah Bazzi; Julia Ebert; Neville Hogan; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.642

5.  Human control of complex objects: Towards more dexterous robots.

Authors:  Salah Bazzi; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  Adv Robot       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 1.699

6.  Robustness in Human Manipulation of Dynamically Complex Objects through Control Contraction Metrics.

Authors:  Salah Bazzi; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2020-02-10

7.  Control of goal-directed movements within (or beyond) reach?: Comment on "Muscleless motor synergies and actions without movements: From motor neuroscience to cognitive robotics" by Vishwanathan Mohan et al.

Authors:  Dagmar Sternad; Neville Hogan
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 9.833

8.  Promoting Motor Variability During Robotic Assistance Enhances Motor Learning of Dynamic Tasks.

Authors:  Özhan Özen; Karin A Buetler; Laura Marchal-Crespo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Preparing to move: Setting initial conditions to simplify interactions with complex objects.

Authors:  Rashida Nayeem; Salah Bazzi; Mohsen Sadeghi; Neville Hogan; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Motor control beyond reach-how humans hit a target with a whip.

Authors:  Aleksei Krotov; Marta Russo; Moses Nah; Neville Hogan; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.653

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.