Literature DB >> 29667102

Body size and tube voltage-dependent guiding equations for optimal selection of image acquisition parameters in clinical X-ray imaging.

Xiaoming Zheng1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to present body size and tube voltage-dependent equations for optimal selection of image acquisition parameters in guiding clinical X-ray imaging. The dose output of X-ray tubes was expressed as a function of the image acquisition parameters of tube voltage (kVp), tube current-exposure time product (mAs), and body size (d). Dose power (n) to kVp was determined to be a linear function of body size in an earlier phantom study. Tube voltage-dependent attenuation coefficients of water were used to determine the kVp effect on the depth dose of X-rays from the body's entrance surface. The new expression for the dose output of X-ray tubes in patients was then employed for image quality and radiation dose optimization, assuming that image quality is a logistic function of the radiation dose to patients. For constant kVp, the percentage of mAs increase for a 1-cm increase in body size d is dependent on the kVp applied. For constant mAs, the percentage of kVp increase for a 1-cm increase in body size is dependent on both body size d and the kVp applied. For constant body size, the percentage of kVp increase should be a fraction of the percentage of decrease in the mAs, where the fraction is dependent on the body size. The improved body size and tube voltage-dependent governing equations for variations in X-ray imaging parameters should be more accurate in guiding optimal selection of the kVp and mAs image acquisition parameters in medical X-ray imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Guiding equations; Imaging acquisition parameters; Radiographic imaging; X-ray imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29667102     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-018-0457-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  10 in total

1.  Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.

Authors:  Marcus Söderberg; Mikael Gunnarsson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Effect of Automated Attenuation-based Tube Voltage Selection on Radiation Dose at CT: An Observational Study on a Global Scale.

Authors:  James V Spearman; U Joseph Schoepf; Marietta Rottenkolber; Ivo Driesser; Christian Canstein; Kolja M Thierfelder; Aleksander W Krazinski; Carlo N De Cecco; Felix G Meinel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.

Authors:  Mark B Williams; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Keith J Strauss; William K Breeden; Mark S Rzeszotarski; Kimberly Applegate; Margaret Wyatt; Sandra Bjork; J Anthony Seibert
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  ICRU Report No. 87: Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography.

Authors: 
Journal:  J ICRU       Date:  2012-04

5.  Radiographic techniques, contrast, and noise in x-ray imaging.

Authors:  Walter Huda; R Brad Abrahams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Best practices in digital radiography.

Authors:  Tracy L Herrmann; Terri L Fauber; Julie Gill; Colleen Hoffman; Denise K Orth; Paulette A Peterson; Randy R Prouty; Andrew P Woodward; Teresa G Odle
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct

7.  General equations for optimal selection of diagnostic image acquisition parameters in clinical X-ray imaging.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zheng
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-08-18

8.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements.

Authors:  W A Kalender; H Wolf; C Suess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  PATIENT SIZE BASED GUIDING EQUATIONS FOR AUTOMATIC mAs AND kVp SELECTIONS IN GENERAL MEDICAL X-RAY PROJECTION RADIOGRAPHY.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zheng
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 10.  Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systematic review.

Authors:  William Ching; John Robinson; Mark McEntee
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.