Literature DB >> 29666915

Corneal crosslinking (CXL) with 18-mW/cm2 irradiance and 5.4-J/cm2 radiant exposure-early postoperative safety.

Isaak Fischinger1,2,3, Theo G Seiler4,5,6, Karthiga Santhirasegaram4, Moritz Pettenkofer4, Chris P Lohmann4, Daniel Zapp4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate safety of accelerated corneal crosslinking during the first postoperative month.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, 76 eyes of 60 patients with verified progressive keratectasia were enrolled in this study and followed for 1 month after accelerated CXL (18 mW/cm2 for 5 min, radiant exposure 5.4 J/cm2) (A-CXL(5*18)). Preoperatively, objective refraction, slit lamp inspection, and corneal tomography were performed. Early postoperative slit lamp examinations were performed on days 1 and 4. At 1 month, objective refraction, slit lamp inspection, and corneal tomography were performed.
RESULTS: Gender distribution was m:f = 55:21, OD:OS was 40:36, and the average age was 26.5 ± 8.6 years at surgery. Only 71 of the 76 eyes completed the 1-month follow-up, indicating a dropout rate of 6.6%. In 7.0% (n = 5), sterile infiltrates were observed; 5.6% of eyes (n = 4) showed delayed epithelial healing (> 4 days) in 2.8% (n = 2); an infection occurred and in 1 eye (1.4%), a stromal scar was detected; no other complications, neither a loss of two or more Snellen lines at 1 month postoperatively, were observed. As a risk factor for sterile infiltrates, thin preoperative pachymetry could be identified (p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed no difference in early postoperative safety between CXL using 18 mW/cm2 and standard corneal CXL. Thinner preoperative pachymetry could be identified predicting a higher rate of postoperative sterile infiltrates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18 mW; Accelerated crosslinking; Corneal crosslinking; Keratectasia; Keratokonus; Sterile infiltrate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29666915     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-3978-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  25 in total

Review 1.  [Complications of corneal cross-linking].

Authors:  T G Seiler; G Schmidinger; I Fischinger; T Koller; T Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Permanent corneal haze after riboflavin-UVA-induced cross-linking in keratoconus.

Authors:  Frederik Raiskup; Anne Hoyer; Eberhard Spoerl
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Current Protocols of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking: Visual, Refractive, and Tomographic Outcomes.

Authors:  Rohit Shetty; Natasha Kishore Pahuja; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Amrita Ajani; Chaitra Jayadev; Chetna Sharma; Harsha Nagaraja
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Intrastromal application of riboflavin for corneal crosslinking.

Authors:  Theo G Seiler; Isaak Fischinger; Tim Senfft; Gerald Schmidinger; Theo Seiler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Sterile corneal infiltrates after corneal collagen cross-linking: evaluation of risk factors.

Authors:  Eren Çerman; Deniz Özarslan Özcan; Ebru Toker
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Safety of high-intensity corneal collagen crosslinking.

Authors:  George D Kymionis; Michael A Grentzelos; Vardhaman P Kankariya; Dimitrios A Liakopoulos; Dimitra M Portaliou; Konstantinos I Tsoulnaras; Alexandra E Karavitaki; Aristophanis I Pallikaris
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Comparison of Corneal Riboflavin Gradients Using Dextran and HPMC Solutions.

Authors:  Tobias Ehmke; Theo G Seiler; Isaak Fischinger; Tammo Ripken; Alexander Heisterkamp; Beatrice E Frueh
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  The Biomechanical Effect of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL) With Riboflavin and UV-A is Oxygen Dependent.

Authors:  Olivier Richoz; Arthur Hammer; David Tabibian; Zisis Gatzioufas; Farhad Hafezi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  One-year outcomes of conventional and accelerated collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Vanissa W S Chow; Tommy C Y Chan; Marco Yu; Victoria W Y Wong; Vishal Jhanji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results.

Authors:  Cosimo Mazzotta; Claudio Traversi; Anna Lucia Paradiso; Maria Eugenia Latronico; Miguel Rechichi
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 1.909

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment indications for corneal crosslinking and clinical results of new corneal crosslinking techniques].

Authors:  Klara Borgardts; Johannes Menzel-Severing; Gerd Geerling; Theo G Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.